So has CM Punk surpassed HHH as a worker?

[Mr.Black]

HHH vs Undertaker wrestlemania matches for the most part =
CM Punk vs Undertaker =

HHH vs Brock matches =

CM Punk vs Brock =

 

[Spike10]

Are you suprised?

all we know that he is THE BEST IN THE WORLD

 

[boriquaking]

triple h is a good worker all of a sudden?

 

[Beautiful Bobby Eatin]

triple h is a good worker all of a sudden?

He's Wiz Khalifa status. He stays in his lane and does it well. His heel work is though

 

[Bud Bundy]

triple H is the GOAT heel. You watch to see him get his ass kicked.

he is a decent wrestler though.

 

[boriquaking]

He's Wiz Khalifa status. He stays in his lane and does it well. His heel work is though

i mean i totally agree his heel work and psychology are up there but he but cm punk has by far always been a better worker.

those mania matches with taker are

 

[Golayitdown]

Yep. Not saying much since the most recent HHH showings are WELL past his prime....

Spoiler

I'd put him past HHH for the career too

 

[R=G]

They're both kind of overrated in the ring but Punk is definitely on more of a roll than Cripple H these days. Cripple H has been having terrible matches since 2002 in many facets. Who watches Cena vs Cripple H from WM 22 by choice again? Who goes back and watches his series of matches with Flair in 2005? Who really watches the Batista matches over and over? No one. He's a chump. I doubt anyone is going back and watching Punk vs Morrison and Punk vs Hardcore Holly from 2007 and 2008 as well.

 

[ML29]

triple H is the GOAT heel. You watch to see him get his ass kicked.

he is a decent wrestler though.

but historically that hardly ever happens, thus defeating the purpose of being a heel in the first place. But to answer the OP question Yes, Punk is better.

 

[Jmare007]

HHH has sucked in the 7-8 few years because he can't work shyt as a babyface. He had a very good match against Juanito in 08' but that was because he worked as the "heel", and that's about it. La Nariz knows how to work control segments but the crowd doesn't give one single fukk when he's selling and acting like a face in peril

Overall, against Punk, it's good discussion though. 2000-2001 La Nariz rivals anything Punk has ever done in the ring IMO but he has too many lows for me to comfortably put him ahead of Phil.

 

[KingDanz]

Triple H is not in his prime

 

[Bud Bundy]

but historically that hardly ever happens, thus defeating the purpose of being a heel in the first place. But to answer the OP question Yes, Punk is better.

you acting like triple h was winning clean though?

 

[Morrison17]

It's simple

HHH vs. Lesnar = two athlets collides
Punk vs. Lesnar = some fake shyt

 

[Versa]

It's simple

HHH vs. Lesnar = two athlets collides
Punk vs. Lesnar = some fake shyt

You're one of the very worst posters on this website. Just had to make sure you were fully aware of this.

 

[ML29]

Delete post