So is it oochie wally or one mic, principles or political party

principle or a political party?

  • principle

  • political party

  • OP is a lowkey alt right, sexist, racist smart dumb nikka


Results are only viewable after voting.

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
48,878
Reputation
7,410
Daps
154,381
Reppin
CookoutGang
It probably only sounds bad because you know more about it than most people. I havent read a post of yours that seems malicious or questionable. Sounds like you're doing good work man. :salute:
it's a work in progress. But I hope one day to be able to do that type of work full time.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,458
Reputation
-604
Daps
15,342
Reppin
WestMidWest
He didn't mention The Koch Brothers and Soros in the same context. He mentioned the Kochs and said "Who aren't voting for Donald Trump by the way" then mentioned Soros and his influence.

Beck is wrong for assuming making the government smaller would decrease the likelihood of corruption. Then he mentions progressives arguing for state power after Trump which is also dumb. He tells long winded stories and makes false equivalences. Also the dude made 90 million dollars using sensationalist rhetoric. fukk him.

smh. This is a classic problem with the political landscape. Nobody is listening to each other, instead their first priority is to defame and discredit only those folks they don't like, regardless of what they say

He used generic terms like
"billionares",
"people on top" and
told a story of a billionare he knows,
to reference ALL billionares (regardless of politics), but here you are desperately grasping for a counter argument, just settled on "bu bu he talmbowt Soros and not Koch"

you missed his entire point about the danger of anyone (regardles of politics) being intellectually dishonest by cherry picking which actions of an individual to reveal inorder to push a narrative, instead of presenting all of their actions in proper context so that others can be fully informed and reach their own conclusion

Thus why he mentioned some of the very useful and popular institutions that are heavily funded by past billionares that are only depicted as robber barons by certain folks. And how the Koch brothers are against Trump, like dems/libs/progressives, while they are republicans. So different political party affiliations doesn't mean you don't agree, unlike what most of us have been conditioned to believe
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,458
Reputation
-604
Daps
15,342
Reppin
WestMidWest
Smaller government doesn't make government immune to influence.

It's a foolish argument

again, more posturing and generalizing. Why?

I have a side business I started that caters to non profits. As a result I've spent a lot of time around small towns and small governments. I can say with 100 percent confidence thT they aren't immune to the influence of the wealthy. In some cases it's almost worse.
smh. so we should take you word for it, then find another small business owner who has "spent a lot of time around small towns and small governments," who says the opposite, then nothing is gained and nobody is informed

notice how many times you've posted in this thread without providing any counter argument to his specific solution towards a problem that affects all citizens
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
48,878
Reputation
7,410
Daps
154,381
Reppin
CookoutGang
again, more posturing and generalizing. Why?


smh. so we should take you word for it, then find another small business owner who has "spent a lot of time around small towns and small governments," who says the opposite, then nothing is gained and nobody is informed

notice how many times you've posted in this thread without providing any counter argument to his specific solution towards a problem that affects all citizens
You're an idiot.

His solution to billionaire influence was smaller goverment. That's not a solution. He in no way says how smaller government stops influence.

I'm telling you first hand small government still deals with influence the same way.


But no, no ones arguing against your points because you haven't even made one and two if someone disagrees with Glen beck, who praised billionaire President Trump last month they aren't being dishonest.


1 star.
Neg.

And I think you're an idiot.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,458
Reputation
-604
Daps
15,342
Reppin
WestMidWest
You're an idiot.
His solution to billionaire influence was smaller goverment. That's not a solution. He in no way says how smaller government stops influence.
I'm telling you first hand small government still deals with influence the same way.
But no, no ones arguing against your points because you haven't even made one and two if someone disagrees with Glen beck, who praised billionaire President Trump last month they aren't being dishonest.
1 star.
Neg.
And I think you're an idiot.
lol. A member of the party of high tolerance, inclusion, and freedom of speech, resorts to name calling while distorting information inorder to defame and discredit, I'm totally shocked :picard:
lmao, you telling me from "first hand," while not working in the government, stop it

You have said nothing of substance and are relying on those of us who are conditioned to dismiss and apply stereotypes when we see certain labels and political affiliations(thus the reference to Trump /Tea party), to convince us via your unsupported rhetoric and to be impressed by your irrelevant credential as a business owner, which doesn't make you authorized to discuss this topic so I'm not sure why you mentioned it

My pops and uncle successfully/unsuccessfully bid on government contracts to work on projects for local agencies, so they must be experts about the government too, you are a clown
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
112,559
Reputation
14,170
Daps
317,990
Reppin
NULL
Glenn Beck is a Mormon before he is a republican, and Mormons view the constitution as a holy book practically. His opposition to Trump was more religious than politically motivated.




Glenn Beck’s Regrets





"He considered voting for Hillary Clinton, but ultimately went for the independent candidate Evan McMullin. Why?

The answer lies in the very catastrophizing that makes Beck sound like a kook. In the mid-1990s, Beck was, by his own account, a “despicable human being,” a divorced, alcoholic, drug-addicted shock jock for a Connecticut radio station. He once put on a banana suit and leaped into a pool of Styrofoam. He repeatedly considered suicide.

Eventually Beck got sober and fell in love with the woman who would become his second wife. But she refused to marry him until they found a religion. So the couple embarked on a “church tour” and were baptized as Mormons in 1999.

For a time, Beck remained apolitical. “I didn’t pay attention to anything until September 11, nothing, nothing,” he explained to me after the taping, as we sat in his office. “I couldn’t have told you the Bill of Rights in any great detail.” He describes 9/11 as “a turning point for me.” He was by then hosting a show in New York, and remembers walking from Ground Zero to his studio and reading on air a 19th-century hymn written by a Mormon pioneer fleeing Missouri on his way to Utah. Beck says he felt a special calling at that moment. “If you have a position on the gate and you don’t warn the people of what you see,” he remembers thinking, “you’re to blame.”

Ever since, Beck has imagined himself as a sentry perched on the national ramparts, warning of looming disaster. Usually, that disaster manifests itself as a threat to the Constitution. Which, given Mormon history, makes perfect sense. Many Americans revere the Constitution. Mormons, however, consider it sacred. In Doctrine and Covenants, a book of Mormon scripture, God says, “I have established the Constitution of this land by the hands of wise men whom I raised up unto this very purpose.” According to polling by David Campbell, a Notre Dame political scientist, 94 percent of American Mormons believe that the “Constitution and the Bill of Rights are divinely inspired.” That’s only two points lower than the percentage who believe that the Book of Mormon is.
:scustrump:
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
48,878
Reputation
7,410
Daps
154,381
Reppin
CookoutGang
So OP you're not going to say what about his position is indeed correct?

Are you going to say how small government will be immune to influence of the wealthy?

Are you going to offer anything to this thread?
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,458
Reputation
-604
Daps
15,342
Reppin
WestMidWest
So OP you're not going to say what about his position is indeed correct?

Are you going to say how small government will be immune to influence of the wealthy?

Are you going to offer anything to this thread?
Just as I thought, you have no actual reasoning why the concept of small government wouldn't prevent influence by the wealthy
you depend on buzzwords and stereotypes to dismiss those with alternate views

The notion is simple...smaller government, clearer understanding of its power, thus easier to apply and enforce rules that doesn't have loop holes
As in Beck's quid pro quo example, the billionare wouldn't be allowed to make a deal with the government about the location of the highway being built on his land, such acts would face immediate jail time
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
48,878
Reputation
7,410
Daps
154,381
Reppin
CookoutGang
Just as I thought, you have no actual reasoning why the concept of small government wouldn't prevent influence by the wealthy
you depend on buzzwords and stereotypes to dismiss those with alternate views

The notion is simple...smaller government, clearer understanding of its power, thus easier to apply and enforce rules that doesn't have loop holes
As in Beck's quid pro quo example, the billiona wouldn't be allowed to make a deal with the government about the location of the highway being built on his land, such acts would face immediate jail time
So your argument is that small government is inherently good thefore it will be immune to influence? If the people in higher positions are corrupt the size of government doesn't change anything.

Further if you actually believe in "small government" meaning The government is more hands off the billionaires would be the one investing in the infrastructure anyway and wouldn't need to influence government to execute their agenda.


This is WOAT level posting.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,458
Reputation
-604
Daps
15,342
Reppin
WestMidWest
So your argument is that small government is inherently good thefore it will be immune to influence? If the people in higher positions are corrupt the size of government doesn't change anything.
Further if you actually believe in "small government" meaning The government is more hands off the billionaires would be the one investing in the infrastructure anyway and wouldn't need to influence government to execute their agenda.
This is WOAT level posting.
smh. At no point have I mentioned anything being inherently good
how could you worry about the boogyman, "the people in higher positions," if it's clear that you cannot make certain deals with the government?
So billionares are not investing in infrastructure due to the government not being small? lol

how do you not have that woat banner, your post in this thread certain nominates you
 
Top