So President Bush was right all along about Iraq

skeetsinternal

I never see my nut
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
33,527
Reputation
9,068
Daps
90,639
Reppin
Cervixes
Posted: September 5, 2014
President Bush Predicted In 2007 With Frightening Accuracy What Is Happening Today In Iraq
President-Bush-Iraq-Warning-665x385.png

They say hindsight is 20/20. In a time when many Americans wanted nothing more than to put the Iraqi war behind them and bring the troops home, former President George W. Bush’s warnings fell largely on deaf ears. Yet, in retrospect, President Bush’s words from a speech made in 2007 were chillingly prophetic.


They are all unfolding before our very eyes.

The speech was made on July 12, 2007, at a time when Congressional leaders and citizens alike were weary of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and pushing for withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. Bush did not believe that a withdrawal would be a wise or strategic move, predicting a number of likely outcomes in Iraq if the United States threw in the towel.

Part of the reason for the election in 2008 of President Barack Obama was the hope by some that Obama would end the war in Iraq. As promised, the United States began an 18-month process of withdrawal. CNN boasted of the exit of the last of U.S. troops from Iraq shortly before Christmas 2011, a move that the commanders on the ground advised against.


But that exit left a vacuum in Iraq, one which has all too quickly been filled by the Islamic State forces, the horrific terror organization that the world has come to know as ISIS or ISIL.

Former President Bush endured excoriation from the media and ridicule from the pundits for his position on Iraq. He was mocked and scorned. But, he was right.

“Every single thing that President Bush said there in that statement is happening today,” says Marc Thiessen, who was Bush’s speechwriter at the time of the 2007 speech. He recently appeared on The Kelly File with Megyn Kelly to discuss the speech he wrote for President Bush.

“It is point by point by point what we are seeing today,” according to Megyn Kelly. She calls Bush’s predictions “eerie.”

“I know some in Washington would like us to start leaving Iraq now. To begin withdrawing before our commanders tell us we are ready would be dangerous for Iraq, for the region, and for the United States. It would mean surrendering the future of Iraq to al Qaeda. It would mean that we’d be risking mass killings on a horrific scale. It would mean we’d allow the terrorists to establish a safe haven in Iraq to replace the one they lost in Afghanistan. It would mean increasing the probability that American troops would have to return at some later date to confront an enemy that is even more dangerous.”

This part of Bush’s speech begins at the 9:00 point.

Steve Bridges - As George W. Bush with George W. Bush!

“President Barack Obama did withdraw troops before the commanders on the ground said they were ready to do so,” reports Newsmax. Thiessen said although the commanders recommended leaving 20,000 troops in Iraq, Obama left none.

When the peacekeeping forces left, Al Qaeda’s successor, ISIS, the Islamic State, came into power and has quickly grown in strength. They were left unchecked, and now, the “mass killings on a horrific scale” predicted by President Bush are today’s daily headlines. These are just a few, as reported by The Inquisitr:

ISIS has managed to carve out a huge territory in Iraq and Syria that it now controls, according to Thiessen.

The ill-advised, premature withdrawal from Iraq has led to the one thing that neither President Bush and his supporters nor his opponents ever wanted to see. It is a grim moment when the very thing that you knew would happen, and you never wanted to happen, happens. However, it is a moment of heaviness and sorrow, not one for gloating or saying “I told you so.”

President Bush made it clear that abandoning Iraq “would mean increasing the probability that American troops would have to return at some later date to confront an enemy that is even more dangerous.” To our horror, his words are coming to pass right before our eyes. The Islamist savages of ISIS make Al Qaeda look like child’s play, and they are drowning Iraq in the blood of innocents. One has to wonder how many now wish that America had heeded President Bush’s chilling warnings about Iraq.


Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/1453870/pr...-happening-today-in-iraq/#GD9CvDCW4VCcCQup.99

 

No_bammer_weed

✌️ Coli. Wish y’all the best of luck. One
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
10,387
Reputation
8,171
Daps
59,168
LOL....the "vacuum" was created when Bush removed Saddam. Doing that created an apocalyptic petri dish that began to fester. The blow back has been in the works for sometime now.

Was Saddam a dictator? Yup. Was he a Tyrant? Yup! (never mind we supported him for decades before) But the alternative to him not being in power, as everyone sane and knowledgable from Republican Brent Scowcroft and James Baker on down ALWAYS warned, was a hugely unstable sectarian powder-keg. And that's exactly what happened.

Fukk outta here with this dumb sonofabytch Bush being right about anything. He claimed we would be hailed as liberators, and declared "mission accomplished" 2 weeks into the the conflict. To date it's 5000+ Americans killed, American Tax Payer bill $3+ Trillion and running, and untold Iraqi civilian and solider casualties more than Sadaam could have ever dreamed in his wildest imagination.
 

I_Got_Da_Burna

Superstar
Joined
Jun 18, 2012
Messages
7,257
Reputation
1,000
Daps
28,812
Reppin
NULL
the military industry complex needs perpetual conflicts to stay in business. he said nothing prophetic.

exactly...bush was working to keep his buddies in business (the oil and weapons industries).

ISIS ain't nothing but al quaida with different clothing on...you can get rid of one group and another one is going to pop up the next week like clockwork. Bush wasn't being prophetic...that's a terrible article written by a bush apologist.
 

How Sway?

Great Value Man
Supporter
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
24,984
Reputation
4,061
Daps
81,650
Reppin
NULL
LOL....the "vacuum" was created when Bush removed Saddam. Doing that created an apocalyptic petri dish that began to fester. The blow back has been in the works for sometime now.

Was Saddam a dictator? Yup. Was he a Tyrant? Yup! (never mind we supported him for decades before) But the alternative to him not being in power, as everyone sane and knowledgable from Republican Brent Scowcroft and James Baker on down ALWAYS warned, was a hugely unstable sectarian powder-keg. And that's exactly what happened.

Fukk outta here with this dumb sonofabytch Bush being right about anything. He claimed we would be hailed as liberators, and declared "mission accomplished" 2 weeks into the the conflict. To date it's 5000+ Americans killed, American Tax Payer bill $3+ Trillion and running, and untold Iraqi civilian and solider casualties more than Sadaam could have ever dreamed in his wildest imagination.
The following error occurred:
You must spread reputation to at least 30 other user(s) before you can give reputation to No_bammer_weed again.
 

dabestkeptsecret

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
8,319
Reputation
1,020
Daps
24,643
Reppin
jerz
LOL....the "vacuum" was created when Bush removed Saddam. Doing that created an apocalyptic petri dish that began to fester. The blow back has been in the works for sometime now.

Was Saddam a dictator? Yup. Was he a Tyrant? Yup! (never mind we supported him for decades before) But the alternative to him not being in power, as everyone sane and knowledgable from Republican Brent Scowcroft and James Baker on down ALWAYS warned, was a hugely unstable sectarian powder-keg. And that's exactly what happened.

Fukk outta here with this dumb sonofabytch Bush being right about anything. He claimed we would be hailed as liberators, and declared "mission accomplished" 2 weeks into the the conflict. To date it's 5000+ Americans killed, American Tax Payer bill $3+ Trillion and running, and untold Iraqi civilian and solider casualties more than Sadaam could have ever dreamed in his wildest imagination.
Pretty much. One of my friends is from lebanon, who used to visit Iraq often before the war, tells me outside of their lack of freedom of speech against the government, most of the people were happy. They had access to schools, healthcare, food, they tolerated christians there ect... Since the invasion, the common person there must be going through hell.
 

DonFrancisco

Your Favorite Tio!
Joined
May 3, 2013
Messages
1,377
Reputation
410
Daps
3,075
Reppin
Sabado Gigante
Actually, had Obama provided better diplomatic and political support for Al-Maliki, ISIS would have had a harder time establishing a presence in Iraq. Everyone seems to think that ISIS alone is basically pushing Iraq to the brink of state dissolving, it is the help of ex-sunni generals, leaders, politicians, and soldiers that has put the current Iraqi government in such a precarious situation. It was also the Bush administration in 2008-2009 started to arm and fund Sunni religious and political groups in order for them to participate in the democratic process in Iraq.

I'm no political and middle-east analyst, but had Obama not pulled out the diplomatic and political support for Iraq, we wouldn't be in this problem. Remember, the U.S. was getting that ass beat until they started low-key paying off and pulling diplomatic moves with Sunni militias, religious, and political leaders. The Kurds were going to do whatever the US asked of them and the Shi'ites more or less were going to make sure the Sunnis and Kurds didn't try to kill them. All that changed when Al-Maliki got power hunger then scared of losing his grip in power, so he purged the army and national leadership of Sunnis. The U.S. by that time had lost contact and stop working with the Sunnis so they had no where else to turn but Islamic groups that would at least promise them protection.

Honestly, Bush pulled the same mistake twice, he had 2 very weak, uninformed men leading the change of Iraq. Al-Maliki didn't have many leadership qualities to lead such a difficult situation in Iraq.

Guess who picked Al-Maliki, Bush. Guess who ignored CIA warnings? Bush. Guess who left Al-Maliki out on his own? Obama. Guess who pulled out diplomatic support? Obama. Guess who stopped paying off and supporting the Sunnis? Obama. This was easy pickings for ISIS.
 
Last edited:

intruder

SOHH Class of 2003 and CASUAL sports fan
Supporter
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
30,438
Reputation
4,506
Daps
58,156
Reppin
Love
Truth is Saddam was in power and able to keep these other factions in check. Now thet Bush "freed" them they are free to wreak havoc
 

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
259,623
Reputation
34,078
Daps
794,172
Reppin
Champions league
LOL....the "vacuum" was created when Bush removed Saddam. Doing that created an apocalyptic petri dish that began to fester. The blow back has been in the works for sometime now.

Was Saddam a dictator? Yup. Was he a Tyrant? Yup! (never mind we supported him for decades before) But the alternative to him not being in power, as everyone sane and knowledgable from Republican Brent Scowcroft and James Baker on down ALWAYS warned, was a hugely unstable sectarian powder-keg. And that's exactly what happened.

Fukk outta here with this dumb sonofabytch Bush being right about anything. He claimed we would be hailed as liberators, and declared "mission accomplished" 2 weeks into the the conflict. To date it's 5000+ Americans killed, American Tax Payer bill $3+ Trillion and running, and untold Iraqi civilian and solider casualties more than Sadaam could have ever dreamed in his wildest imagination.

yep
same thing is happening in libya right now after gaddafi was thrown out, now its in a state of chaos with militants
 

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
259,623
Reputation
34,078
Daps
794,172
Reppin
Champions league
Truth is Saddam was in power and able to keep these other factions in check. Now thet Bush "freed" them they are free to wreak havoc

same thing in libya

the house of saud (saudi arabia) is just as bad as saddam and gaddafi, but if the house of saud was to ever bb edisposed of :sas1:

democracy doesn't work in the majority of the nmiddle east, i think only turkey and yemen it someone what does


jordan = king abdullah
saudi arabia = house of saud
egypt -= had mubarak now country in a stae of discord
iran = ayallatoyah
syria - assad - where isis began whent eh us tried to overthrow him
uae = monarcy
 
Top