You can't have it both ways really. You can't complain when the US supports dictatorial leaders, while suppressing the locals to keep peace, then criticize them for supporting those leaders when the locals end up overthrowing them. (Like Egypt.) It would be a lot more honest, if people just said they didn't care about the Middle East and didn't care what it took to maintain order.
To be fair, it was at the time. The war was between the Iraqi army and the USA, and they won in 23 days. Everything else was a new enemy entering the conflict.LOL....the "vacuum" was created when Bush removed Saddam. Doing that created an apocalyptic petri dish that began to fester. The blow back has been in the works for sometime now.
Was Saddam a dictator? Yup. Was he a Tyrant? Yup! (never mind we supported him for decades before) But the alternative to him not being in power, as everyone sane and knowledgable from Republican Brent Scowcroft and James Baker on down ALWAYS warned, was a hugely unstable sectarian powder-keg. And that's exactly what happened.
Fukk outta here with this dumb sonofabytch Bush being right about anything. He claimed we would be hailed as liberators, and declared "mission accomplished" 2 weeks into the the conflict. To date it's 5000+ Americans killed, American Tax Payer bill $3+ Trillion and running, and untold Iraqi civilian and solider casualties more than Sadaam could have ever dreamed in his wildest imagination.