Somali-Americans on 60 minutes talking about joining ISIS

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
104,391
Reputation
14,164
Daps
246,549
American Somalis wont be talkin that we not like you nikkas no more

More like

Brothers :blessed:

They fukkin with US
 

BocaRear

The World Is My Country, To Do Good Is My Religion
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
13,740
Reputation
6,525
Daps
78,736
I think at this point for national security reasons no non Muslim nations should accept immigranta from these countries. Trump was right I hate to admit.

But what about the constitution tho? :skip:
 

BocaRear

The World Is My Country, To Do Good Is My Religion
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
13,740
Reputation
6,525
Daps
78,736
The constitution :mjlol:



What about it though..:comeon:

The 1st amendment clearly states that the government cannot making any law prohibiting the free exercise of an established religion.

America was literally founded by people who were persecuted due to their religious beliefs.

Tell me how banning a group of people from entering your country because of their religion is constitutional or would pass in congress.

Tell me how it would even be practical?

How do you prove someone's religious beliefs?

Or do you plan to ban people from particular countries?

How about the homegrown terrorists?

Will this policy not further alienate Muslims and allow them to be more easily radicalised?

The whole idea is completely retarded; if you look at history in general you would realise that persecuting a religious demographic only makes them become disenfranchised

Look up Bismarck's Kulturkampf and his policy against Catholics who were seen as terrorists in the 19th century, his repressive policy only proved to radicalise the moderates :francis:
 

Scuti

Superstar
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Messages
6,425
Reputation
5,514
Daps
45,554
how to make americans fear the black man even more?
merge them with terrorists
nothing but some bullshyt to see here
01SHf29.gif
 

pawdalaw

Superstar
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
8,927
Reputation
2,513
Daps
29,113
Reppin
The Set
@BocaRear, It's all nice in theory but black folks know that the constitution wasn't written with them in mind. It has also been examples of it's disregard even for white folks in recent history.
 

3rdWorld

Veteran
Joined
Mar 24, 2014
Messages
51,564
Reputation
5,397
Daps
151,150
The 1st amendment clearly states that the government cannot making any law prohibiting the free exercise of an established religion.

America was literally founded by people who were persecuted due to their religious beliefs.

Tell me how banning a group of people from entering your country because of their religion is constitutional or would pass in congress.

Tell me how it would even be practical?

How do you prove someone's religious beliefs?

Or do you plan to ban people from particular countries?

How about the homegrown terrorists?

Will this policy not further alienate Muslims and allow them to be more easily radicalised?

The whole idea is completely retarded; if you look at history in general you would realise that persecuting a religious demographic only makes them become disenfranchised

Look up Bismarck's Kulturkampf and his policy against Catholics who were seen as terrorists in the 19th century, his repressive policy only proved to radicalise the moderates :francis:

The powers that be dont give a shyt about no constitution..if it did we wouldn't be in the shyt we in..lmao at you thinking the useless constitution should protect immigrants from terrorist nations but not AA's. be serious breh..
 

Elle Driver

Veteran
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Messages
27,451
Reputation
13,110
Daps
100,745
Reppin
At the beginning of mean streets
The 1st amendment clearly states that the government cannot making any law prohibiting the free exercise of an established religion.

America was literally founded by people who were persecuted due to their religious beliefs.

Tell me how banning a group of people from entering your country because of their religion is constitutional or would pass in congress.

Tell me how it would even be practical?

How do you prove someone's religious beliefs?

Or do you plan to ban people from particular countries?

How about the homegrown terrorists?

Will this policy not further alienate Muslims and allow them to be more easily radicalised?

The whole idea is completely retarded; if you look at history in general you would realise that persecuting a religious demographic only makes them become disenfranchised

Look up Bismarck's Kulturkampf and his policy against Catholics who were seen as terrorists in the 19th century, his repressive policy only proved to radicalise the moderates :francis:
Banning Muslims makes no sense based on their reasoning because most of these publicized terrorists were either born or raised here so immigration is a moot point.

The American hegemony in those regions spends billions of tax payers dollars instead of fixing issues in the US. Much like the military industrial complex in the US which plays a part in why kids from religious minorities feel alienated enough to join them.
 

BocaRear

The World Is My Country, To Do Good Is My Religion
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
13,740
Reputation
6,525
Daps
78,736
The powers that be dont give a shyt about no constitution..if it did we wouldn't be in the shyt we in..lmao at you thinking the useless constitution should protect immigrants from terrorist nations but not AA's. be serious breh..

You're not making any type of a reasonable argument at all and you're trying to play it off in a "the government is bad so it doesn't matter anyway" fashion

You're saying that because "the powers that be" (incredibly vague) don't give a shyt about the constitution (which is somewhat true, however they don't openly undermine it, it's more subtle abuses of the 4th and the 8th in particular) it's justified that they should ban Muslims?

Basically your argument is condensed to: everybody does bad things, why don't we endorse some more bad things :comeon:

And also please tell me where I said the constitution should protect Terrorists and not AAs?

@BocaRear, It's all nice in theory but black folks know that the constitution wasn't written with them in mind. It has also been examples of it's disregard even for white folks in recent history.

I'm not denying the systematic racism that's present in America, however the Constitution can and has been interpreted in ways to defend the civil liberties of the people.

The constitution is fundamental to legal justice and appeal processes whether you think so or not, lawyers like Thurgood Marshall have helped the Black movement with citing it to win cases that have set precedents which affect your life on a daily basis

Banning Muslims makes no sense based on their reasoning because most of these publicized terrorists were either born or raised here so immigration is a moot point.

The American hegemony in those regions spends billions of tax payers dollars instead of fixing issues in the US. Much like the military industrial complex in the US which plays a part in why kids from religious minorities feel alienated enough to join them.

It makes no sense: it's impractical, it's unconstitutional, it's not going to be very useful either, what would stop a Jihadist about lying about their religion? How does a person even determine someone's religious beliefs?

It's just a feel good tactic for simple minded people, what they don't realise is it's dangerous as it sets a precedent for the government to start EXPLICITLY persecuting groups of people; no more sneaky drug laws, they're just gonna start coming back for black people outright next. :francis:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,073
Daps
641,708
Reppin
The Deep State
The 1st amendment clearly states that the government cannot making any law prohibiting the free exercise of an established religion.

America was literally founded by people who were persecuted due to their religious beliefs.

Tell me how banning a group of people from entering your country because of their religion is constitutional or would pass in congress.

Tell me how it would even be practical?

How do you prove someone's religious beliefs?

Or do you plan to ban people from particular countries?

How about the homegrown terrorists?

Will this policy not further alienate Muslims and allow them to be more easily radicalised?

The whole idea is completely retarded; if you look at history in general you would realise that persecuting a religious demographic only makes them become disenfranchised

Look up Bismarck's Kulturkampf and his policy against Catholics who were seen as terrorists in the 19th century, his repressive policy only proved to radicalise the moderates :francis:
Stop talking crazy.

No one cares about your islam.
 
Top