Islam 






I think at this point for national security reasons no non Muslim nations should accept immigranta from these countries. Trump was right I hate to admit.

But what about the constitution tho?![]()


The constitution
What about it though..![]()

The 1st amendment clearly states that the government cannot making any law prohibiting the free exercise of an established religion.
America was literally founded by people who were persecuted due to their religious beliefs.
Tell me how banning a group of people from entering your country because of their religion is constitutional or would pass in congress.
Tell me how it would even be practical?
How do you prove someone's religious beliefs?
Or do you plan to ban people from particular countries?
How about the homegrown terrorists?
Will this policy not further alienate Muslims and allow them to be more easily radicalised?
The whole idea is completely retarded; if you look at history in general you would realise that persecuting a religious demographic only makes them become disenfranchised
Look up Bismarck's Kulturkampf and his policy against Catholics who were seen as terrorists in the 19th century, his repressive policy only proved to radicalise the moderates![]()
Banning Muslims makes no sense based on their reasoning because most of these publicized terrorists were either born or raised here so immigration is a moot point.The 1st amendment clearly states that the government cannot making any law prohibiting the free exercise of an established religion.
America was literally founded by people who were persecuted due to their religious beliefs.
Tell me how banning a group of people from entering your country because of their religion is constitutional or would pass in congress.
Tell me how it would even be practical?
How do you prove someone's religious beliefs?
Or do you plan to ban people from particular countries?
How about the homegrown terrorists?
Will this policy not further alienate Muslims and allow them to be more easily radicalised?
The whole idea is completely retarded; if you look at history in general you would realise that persecuting a religious demographic only makes them become disenfranchised
Look up Bismarck's Kulturkampf and his policy against Catholics who were seen as terrorists in the 19th century, his repressive policy only proved to radicalise the moderates![]()
The powers that be dont give a shyt about no constitution..if it did we wouldn't be in the shyt we in..lmao at you thinking the useless constitution should protect immigrants from terrorist nations but not AA's. be serious breh..

@BocaRear, It's all nice in theory but black folks know that the constitution wasn't written with them in mind. It has also been examples of it's disregard even for white folks in recent history.
Banning Muslims makes no sense based on their reasoning because most of these publicized terrorists were either born or raised here so immigration is a moot point.
The American hegemony in those regions spends billions of tax payers dollars instead of fixing issues in the US. Much like the military industrial complex in the US which plays a part in why kids from religious minorities feel alienated enough to join them.

Stop talking crazy.The 1st amendment clearly states that the government cannot making any law prohibiting the free exercise of an established religion.
America was literally founded by people who were persecuted due to their religious beliefs.
Tell me how banning a group of people from entering your country because of their religion is constitutional or would pass in congress.
Tell me how it would even be practical?
How do you prove someone's religious beliefs?
Or do you plan to ban people from particular countries?
How about the homegrown terrorists?
Will this policy not further alienate Muslims and allow them to be more easily radicalised?
The whole idea is completely retarded; if you look at history in general you would realise that persecuting a religious demographic only makes them become disenfranchised
Look up Bismarck's Kulturkampf and his policy against Catholics who were seen as terrorists in the 19th century, his repressive policy only proved to radicalise the moderates![]()