Spliff
Godzilla got busy.
Lots of companies have lots of patents. Worry about it when it comes to fruition, which it won't because it's stupid.
Have you not been paying attention lately?
A patent means its already happening.
Lots of companies have lots of patents. Worry about it when it comes to fruition, which it won't because it's stupid.
Link?![]()



May 25 2012![]()

Look at the stans rushing in to defend this shyt.
![]()
Why does it matter when the patent was filed? If anything the fact that it was filed in 2012 gave them plenty of time to implement these features on the ps4
![]()
Sony announced ages ago this won't be in the PS4.
So you're still acting like an obtuse Microsoft shill and pretending there's no difference between one system making the supposed surveillance mandatory and the other not, right?
K, just checking.
I'm looking for the link that says this will be implementing on the PS4
show me the link where it says PS4 will implement those features..
did you run in Xbox patent threads demanding links?So you're still acting as if a camera that can be turned off and disabled="manditory surveillance"
OK, Just checking
did you run in Xbox patent threads demanding links?


Kinect can be totaly disabled by users if they are concerned with privacy.What does this even mean? Explain it like I'm 5 cause this isn't making sense. I don't need an EYE to simply play games on Playstation. You must have Kinect attached to run a One.
Well then you don't understand the premise of this thread. Kindly remove yourself please. This isn't concerning you.
i don't even know which thread you referring to. And i don't really give a fukk about the xbox cause i am not a big fan.
Been a PS fan since the PS1 era...
And again...show me the links where it says the PS4 will implement those features. If not, then there's no need for this thread.
Also, May 25 2012.
You have to look a year old article to bash the PS4. How sad. Dude do something more enjoyable with your life.