st0rmfr0nt clowning LipstickAlley

[lightskinjezebel]

@Cabbage Patch
Why do you say they're perverts ? did u trak ther ip addresses to pron sites or osmething?

 

[lightskinjezebel]

Lipstickalley is just a bunch of women that gossip and live vicariously through groupies and celebs.

Many are unattractive and overweight (see the threads they make when they reference themselves, many are actually closeted and out gay MALES, and few are living in reality.

They got posters that act like they are the celebs they talk about Grown ass women and queer dudes. It's an adult Black Teen Beat forum and its sad, yet entertaining that these people exist.

Also theyre a bunch of psychopathic bytches who stalk ppl and lie
a

 

[drifter]

Yikes, the comments on that page are food for thought. I did not know much of that.



Nonsense, people need to name names. I guess the white people are shielded because they're more likely to sue than black people are? Since the site being sued came up and why some of these people are mentioning Condi lying about not knowing IP addresses.

What if Condi is real, but she's just a figurehead now?

Speaking of figureheads.... who owns Media Take Out now?

I thought that African owned MTO. TBH, I'm suspicious of all those websites (MTO, Bossip, WWHH, etc)

They've more than likely all been bought out.

As far as "Condi", I think she's real except her name might not be Condi and she doesn't own the website. Which is fine, folks cash in all the time. I just think it's weird how she still lingers around, that is assuming all this is real of course.

When are cacs ever not delusional and threatened?

When they live in Florida and they're bigger, stronger, and about 15-20 years older than you. They're pretty bold then.

 

[Vashti]

Open internet, can browse where I want. You do not know the purpose of such so please reserve judgement. My job can be to monitor dialogue on such sites - ever think of that

Whatever guy. I just don't understand what point you were/are trying regarding LSA and its ownership since neither you nor the OP of the topic on storm front have evidence.

And what do you mean "monitoring dialogue"? You think they're plotting a race war or government takeover or something?

 

[Vashti]

Open internet, can browse where I want. You do not know the purpose of such so please reserve judgement. My job can be to monitor dialogue on such sites - ever think of that

Whatever guy. I just don't understand what point you were/are trying regarding LSA and its ownership since neither you nor the OP of the topic on storm front have evidence.

And what do you mean "monitoring dialogue"? You think they're plotting a race war or government takeover or something?

 

[Yakno1]

And what do you mean "monitoring dialogue"? You think they're plotting a race war or government takeover or something?

You have a lot to learn.

 

[Giselle]

Lol, so basically I'm making everything up and just saying anything because I hate LSA huh?

http://www.lipstickalley.com/showthread.php?t=671889

This is from a quick google search of "lipstickalley" and "cracker", imagine how many more examples I could find if I really looked. And it happened only a few days ago too would you look at that. Look at how cracker is spelled by everyone in this thread and the posters who make mention of the word being banned. More specifically find this sentence in the OP:

http://www.jta.org/2014/03/21/life-...ed-crackers-may-taste-treif-but-theyre-kosher


What is censored at the end over on LSA?

You didn't answer anything. You rush into the thread talking about the language that person was using and what website it was on proves and how it proves that person doesn't like LSA, and how Coli is always asking questions and apparently stealing thread ideas. You haven't done shyt but defend LSA and shyt on (or at least try your best to) myself and The Coli.

I know what I've seen happen and everything I've said is real, as that link shows. And I've seen similar stuff to what Milk N Cookies said happen to her happen too. But it's not happening to me so I don't give a shyt or feel like continuing the conversation at this point, the reason it's like that over there is because she has people like you supporting this type of c00nery.

If you copy and paste the quotes that I quoted from LSA into google, you can find the exact threads where I got them from. Those threads had the word cracker used in a racial way, not talking about food like in the thread that you linked , and it was not and is still not censored. People over there self-censor the word because they want to, not because the website automatically censor it. Do you understand now?

(red neck Post #8)
http://www.lipstickalley.com/showthread.php?t=659079

(red neck post #37) ("ugly white people" is in there too)
http://www.lipstickalley.com/showthread.php?p=16770769

(crackers post # 7)
http://www.lipstickalley.com/showthread.php?p=16551580


You don't want to be wrong, but you are. Deal with it.

 

[Giselle]

@Giselle caping for trannies and seeing nothing wrong with the word "nikka" not being banned but redneck is

You don't know what you're talking about. The word red neck is not banned, neither is the word cracker. I'm not "caping" for anything. Is the word nikka banned over here?

Edit: I guess not, because I just typed it. It's not banned on here or over there. So what's the problem exactly?

 

[drifter]

So I give you an example of it being censored on the actual website and your rebuttal is "they're talking about things you eat". When that too actually helps prove my point.

Look dumb hoe, don't drag me into this thread again.

 

[Vashti]

You have a lot to learn.

Well inform me then. That's what we're on a messageboard for anyways...to share ideas and ish.

 

[Yakno1]

Well inform me then. That's what we're on a messageboard for anyways...to share ideas and ish.

In shortest terms possible, big brother has domestic programs that monitor commentary for a wide number of issues in order to tap the pulse of it's citizens.

 

[Giselle]

So I give you an example of it being censored on the actual website and your rebuttal is "they're talking about things you eat". When that too actually helps prove my point.

Look dumb hoe, don't drag me into this thread again.

You fukking idiot. Do you not understand what self censored is? That means that the people typed it that way. The website does not censor those words. The people chose to type it that way, they did not have to type it that way. I showed you examples of when people typed it the normal way. If people can type those words the regular way on that website, that means that those words are not censored. Do you understand now, retard?

You are wrong. Accept it.