Swagger: 10 Urgent Rules for Raising Boys in an Era of Failing Schools, Mass Jobless

Un-AmericanDreamer

Simp City
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,740
Reputation
1,318
Daps
30,393
Saw this book at the library today, caught my eye. If I ever get my library fine paid off, I'll make it the first thing I check out. It seems like white people are starting to wake up to the realization that they the seeds they sowed in the 60's and 70s to keep black men disenfranchised would end up bitting them in the ass and the promotion of neo-feminism is the cherry on top that's gonna bring the whole system crashing , it's no longer contained in just our community now, they starting to feel it in theirs. It's no longer fun when little Tommy comes home and starts emulating the role models that was pushed onto our sons since ages. The truth is our system is not equipped to facilitate boys and their needs, they ain't got not safety nets to fall back on if they mess up. If they mess up, they're as good as done.

"At this very moment, through no fault of their own, our boys are caught in the vortex of four powerful, insidious, often invisible forces which conspire to rob them of their future." We medicate, discipline, suspend and expel our boys from school at quadruple the rate of girls. We let double the number of boys drop out of high school than girls, and of those boys who do graduate, they are far more likely than their sisters to be illiterate, to fail to go to college, or to drop out of college if they do go. Young American men are unemployed at the rate of their counterparts in Arab Spring countries. Pop culture hammers our boys with the message that manhood equals emotional numbness, gun violence, rape, and drug use. And we incarcerate more of our boys and men than any other country on earth, now or in human history.

Amazon.com: Swagger: 10 Urgent Rules for Raising Boys in an Era of Failing Schools, Mass Joblessness, and Thug Culture (9781936467693): Lisa Bloom: Books

SWAGGER is a wakeup call for parents about the real world our boys inhabit right now, but it offers solutions as well. From how to teach your boy humility (the swagger anti-venom), to "making your home a reading mecca," creating an expectation of college graduation, and how to teach your boy to be critical of the media onslaught in his life, this book is also packed with research-proven, parent-tested, teacher-approved practical solutions, delivered in the author's trademark no-nonsense, often humorous, take-charge voice.
 

Habit

Banned
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
820
Reputation
10
Daps
270
They gotta kill this indoctrination nonsense they push in black schools, cause they don't want to hurt kid's feelings. They used to try to feed me this garbage, but I already knew it was a cold world at a very early age. They better teach those kids early on life is not fair, and the world doesn't owe you nothing. That's what the white fathers tell their kids who try to blame others for their problems.
 

Un-AmericanDreamer

Simp City
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,740
Reputation
1,318
Daps
30,393
They gotta kill this indoctrination nonsense they push in black schools, cause they don't want to hurt kid's feelings. They used to try to feed me this garbage, but I already knew it was a cold world at a very early age. They better teach those kids early on life is not fair, and the world doesn't owe you nothing. That's what the white fathers tell their kids who try to blame others for their problems.

:jawalrus: A white woman wrote this book b
 

kevm3

follower of Jesus
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,314
Reputation
5,595
Daps
83,640
That's the big problem. We keep on having these women play the role of man and being forced to raise these kids and give them guidance. These kids NEED fathers. They are missing out on a whole different perspective they simply cannot get from a woman. If a boy is around nothing but feminine figures his whole life, he will pick up on those traits.

The media is pushing all of these subservient, weak, goofy images of males and now they are pushing homosexuality everywhere and they are wondering why these young males are becoming so weak. I remember growing up in school as well that the focus was pretty much on the girls and how to create strong women and all that, but they didn't say a thing about how to do the same for boys. Men should be leaders and problem-solvers and if you look at older media, they were exactly that. This feminism and homosexuality induced media has a lot of males almost ashamed to accept their duties as a man to be the strong one that leads.
 

Food Mane

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
8,169
Reputation
2,180
Daps
20,204
Reppin
NULL
That's the big problem. We keep on having these women play the role of man and being forced to raise these kids and give them guidance. These kids NEED fathers. They are missing out on a whole different perspective they simply cannot get from a woman. If a boy is around nothing but feminine figures his whole life, he will pick up on those traits.

The media is pushing all of these subservient, weak, goofy images of males and now they are pushing homosexuality everywhere and they are wondering why these young males are becoming so weak. I remember growing up in school as well that the focus was pretty much on the girls and how to create strong women and all that, but they didn't say a thing about how to do the same for boys. Men should be leaders and problem-solvers and if you look at older media, they were exactly that. This feminism and homosexuality induced media has a lot of males almost ashamed to accept their duties as a man to be the strong one that leads.

You don't know what feminism is. The only reason you think men should be "leaders and problem solvers" is because those are the roles that you have come to believe men should play. It's not innate, it's learned. Feminism, basically, is about abolishing preconceived notions of gender. You know, man hunter, woman cook, etc. That paradigm is no longer useful in modern society.

You also don't know how to use the word induced.
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,105
Reputation
5,015
Daps
70,140
You'd probably get more press with this in Higher Learning.
 

kevm3

follower of Jesus
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,314
Reputation
5,595
Daps
83,640
You don't know what feminism is. The only reason you think men should be "leaders and problem solvers" is because those are the roles that you have come to believe men should play. It's not innate, it's learned. Feminism, basically, is about abolishing preconceived notions of gender. You know, man hunter, woman cook, etc. That paradigm is no longer useful in modern society.

You also don't know how to use the word induced.

Actually roles are still quite useful in modern society. It's all about 'abolishing preconceived notions of gender' until it doesn't benefit the woman. Let's see how much these females want to get drafted into wars and be forced to fight on the front lines in the name of equality. Let's see how many women want to abolish the whole 'don't hit a woman' ideal in the name of equality. Let's see how many women really want to abolish the 'mom gets the kid' assumption in divorce court in the name of equality. How about eliminating alimony and her having to support herself after a divorce just as a man would in the name of equality? I want to see 'feminists' rush to abolish those gender-based benefits so they can truly be respected as an equal. We'll talk about this whole equal thing when women make it equal on the consequences side as well.

I'll respect this whole women want to be equal to men when I see a lot more women start to be the primary income and allow the man to take years off working while he stays at home with the kid. I'll respect it when I see a dangerous situation come up and the woman steps up and knocks out an attacker and protects the man. I'll respect it when I see women staying with a man who cries on her shoulder about how he doesn't feel safe and who he tells all her problem with. Won't happen. Women will call him a punk or soft. I never want to hear a woman tell her daughter, "Find a man with money" because she is now equal to a man. You know what, I'll respect this whole equality thing if women lose the whole concept of expecting a man to take them out and pay for dinner. Let's start there with something simple.

Women getting the right to vote and to gain employment at fair wages is a great thing, but let's be real. Women don't really want to be completely equal to men. Some of them like to role-play and act like men until it comes time to pay the man price for out of line actions. If society drastically declines and becomes very dangerous and if war touches our shores, we'll see how real this equality stuff is... more than likely the task of protecting and defending will fall on the men. We'll see how cute women think feminized and soft men are then.
 

Black Magisterialness

Moderna Boi
Supporter
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
19,586
Reputation
4,125
Daps
47,054
Actually roles are still quite useful in modern society. It's all about 'abolishing preconceived notions of gender' until it doesn't benefit the woman. Let's see how much these females want to get drafted into wars and be forced to fight on the front lines in the name of equality. Let's see how many women want to abolish the whole 'don't hit a woman' ideal in the name of equality. Let's see how many women really want to abolish the 'mom gets the kid' assumption in divorce court in the name of equality. How about eliminating alimony and her having to support herself after a divorce just as a man would in the name of equality? I want to see 'feminists' rush to abolish those gender-based benefits so they can truly be respected as an equal. We'll talk about this whole equal thing when women make it equal on the consequences side as well.

I'll respect this whole women want to be equal to men when I see a lot more women start to be the primary income and allow the man to take years off working while he stays at home with the kid. I'll respect it when I see a dangerous situation come up and the woman steps up and knocks out an attacker and protects the man. I'll respect it when I see women staying with a man who cries on her shoulder about how he doesn't feel safe and who he tells all her problem with. Won't happen. Women will call him a punk or soft. I never want to hear a woman tell her daughter, "Find a man with money" because she is now equal to a man. You know what, I'll respect this whole equality thing if women lose the whole concept of expecting a man to take them out and pay for dinner. Let's start there with something simple.

Women getting the right to vote and to gain employment at fair wages is a great thing, but let's be real. Women don't really want to be completely equal to men. Some of them like to role-play and act like men until it comes time to pay the man price for out of line actions. If society drastically declines and becomes very dangerous and if war touches our shores, we'll see how real this equality stuff is... more than likely the task of protecting and defending will fall on the men. We'll see how cute women think feminized and soft men are then.

I actually read that and it was actually really poignant from a males perspective. I agree with most all of it outside of the armed forces point... they already do that in Isreal and women in the military are pillars of the society. But other than that :myman:
 

Food Mane

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
8,169
Reputation
2,180
Daps
20,204
Reppin
NULL
Actually roles are still quite useful in modern society. It's all about 'abolishing preconceived notions of gender' until it doesn't benefit the woman. Let's see how much these females want to get drafted into wars and be forced to fight on the front lines in the name of equality. Let's see how many women want to abolish the whole 'don't hit a woman' ideal in the name of equality. Let's see how many women really want to abolish the 'mom gets the kid' assumption in divorce court in the name of equality. How about eliminating alimony and her having to support herself after a divorce just as a man would in the name of equality? I want to see 'feminists' rush to abolish those gender-based benefits so they can truly be respected as an equal. We'll talk about this whole equal thing when women make it equal on the consequences side as well.

I'll respect this whole women want to be equal to men when I see a lot more women start to be the primary income and allow the man to take years off working while he stays at home with the kid. I'll respect it when I see a dangerous situation come up and the woman steps up and knocks out an attacker and protects the man. I'll respect it when I see women staying with a man who cries on her shoulder about how he doesn't feel safe and who he tells all her problem with. Won't happen. Women will call him a punk or soft. I never want to hear a woman tell her daughter, "Find a man with money" because she is now equal to a man. You know what, I'll respect this whole equality thing if women lose the whole concept of expecting a man to take them out and pay for dinner. Let's start there with something simple.

Women getting the right to vote and to gain employment at fair wages is a great thing, but let's be real. Women don't really want to be completely equal to men. Some of them like to role-play and act like men until it comes time to pay the man price for out of line actions. If society drastically declines and becomes very dangerous and if war touches our shores, we'll see how real this equality stuff is... more than likely the task of protecting and defending will fall on the men. We'll see how cute women think feminized and soft men are then.

Everything you claimed you would like to see happens all of the time in every developed country in the world. Women are soldiers, paternity leave exists, assault is illegal against a man or a woman, men get sole custody, men collect alimony, and women emotionally support their partner.

As for your last point about war landing our shores and humanity being thrust into a post apocalyptic struggle for survival, I suppose we will adopt more traditional gender roles. Because that's what would be required. My point is that the construction that men are providers, leaders, and protectors and women are homemakers and baby makers has outlived it's usefullness.

You think this antiquated idea is natural because it's all you know. It isn't. Gender roles change. And they should change.
 

Nintendough

#Kliq
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
30,087
Reputation
7,181
Daps
84,956
Reppin
Eagles, Canes, Kliq, Sixers
Actually roles are still quite useful in modern society. It's all about 'abolishing preconceived notions of gender' until it doesn't benefit the woman. Let's see how much these females want to get drafted into wars and be forced to fight on the front lines in the name of equality. Let's see how many women want to abolish the whole 'don't hit a woman' ideal in the name of equality. Let's see how many women really want to abolish the 'mom gets the kid' assumption in divorce court in the name of equality. How about eliminating alimony and her having to support herself after a divorce just as a man would in the name of equality? I want to see 'feminists' rush to abolish those gender-based benefits so they can truly be respected as an equal. We'll talk about this whole equal thing when women make it equal on the consequences side as well.

I'll respect this whole women want to be equal to men when I see a lot more women start to be the primary income and allow the man to take years off working while he stays at home with the kid. I'll respect it when I see a dangerous situation come up and the woman steps up and knocks out an attacker and protects the man. I'll respect it when I see women staying with a man who cries on her shoulder about how he doesn't feel safe and who he tells all her problem with. Won't happen. Women will call him a punk or soft. I never want to hear a woman tell her daughter, "Find a man with money" because she is now equal to a man. You know what, I'll respect this whole equality thing if women lose the whole concept of expecting a man to take them out and pay for dinner. Let's start there with something simple.

Women getting the right to vote and to gain employment at fair wages is a great thing, but let's be real. Women don't really want to be completely equal to men. Some of them like to role-play and act like men until it comes time to pay the man price for out of line actions. If society drastically declines and becomes very dangerous and if war touches our shores, we'll see how real this equality stuff is... more than likely the task of protecting and defending will fall on the men. We'll see how cute women think feminized and soft men are then.

I'm glad somebody gets it. Women want to be men until its crunch time. Its like playing dress up for Halloween.
 

Prodyson

All Star
Joined
May 22, 2012
Messages
3,968
Reputation
1,023
Daps
11,588
Everything you claimed you would like to see happens all of the time in every developed country in the world. Women are soldiers, paternity leave exists, assault is illegal against a man or a woman, men get sole custody, men collect alimony, and women emotionally support their partner.

As for your last point about war landing our shores and humanity being thrust into a post apocalyptic struggle for survival, I suppose we will adopt more traditional gender roles. Because that's what would be required. My point is that the construction that men are providers, leaders, and protectors and women are homemakers and baby makers has outlived it's usefullness.

You think this antiquated idea is natural because it's all you know. It isn't. Gender roles change. And they should change.

Umm... I think you're missing the point.

I don't think he's referring the the laws that are in place, but moreso the ideology. What do we think and how do we feel about certain things. Sure there are laws that will send a man or woman to jail for hitting the other. But it is not accepted, and actually considered heinous, for a man to hit a woman...

Sure men get custody... but only in the case of a very bad mother. Otherwise, the mother is generally granted custody, and most women feel that is the way it should be.

Sure there are men who stay at home while the woman is the breadwinner, but that is far from the norm, and society would say that man is weak.

Yea women support their partners... but it is not expected nearly as much as from a man. And as men, we're expected to be much more tolerant of the emotions of a woman, where as if a man shows too much emotion he is considered weak.

I could go on and on.... Kev is right. Woman don't really want equality, they want the BENEFITS that the man has gained through being in a male dominated society, but not the undesirable responsibilities that sometimes come with them. And in my opinion, that's all well and good, but don't complain about equality when that's not really what you want.
 

Black Magisterialness

Moderna Boi
Supporter
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
19,586
Reputation
4,125
Daps
47,054
there's no such thing as a man-beater...or deadbeat mom...the terms just don't exist in our society.

If a man says "i wanna stay home and raise my kids" he looked at on some sideways-homo shyt. A woman says it and she is considered a traditionalist and is applauded...

not that either one of those are wrong but i think Gender roles exist because men and women ARE NOT the same...you all have children. We can't do that. And thus there are many more things you all have to worry about health wise. Certain jobs a woman is just ill-advised to do especially if she intends on having children.

Not that they can't its just ill advised. But the offenders here are the women that lobby for the same "rights" as Men without the sociological drawbacks. Should women get paid the same...yeah...should they have the ability to follow any career path...yeah...BUT if we are talking about protection under the LAW and the court of public opinion..the scales have ALWAYS been fukked. I know a girl right now with custody of her kids RAPING they daddy check (cuz he got the good job and she work at family dollar) cuz of course the judge ruled in her favor.

Them kids could be in a much better environment
 
Top