holidayinn21
:SmugMoneyMike:
Look at this guzzler over here.......

Look at this guzzler over here.......
ExactlyTake 70 shots to score 54 points, ‘90s brehs.
![]()
No lolAm I crazy for thinking a squad built like the old days of the 90s, one heavy on defense and attacking the paint, would feast against alot of these teams that Jack up 3s?
Take 70 shots to score 54 points, ‘90s brehs.
![]()
They scored like 85 points how are gonna feast against people who score 105 points just jacking up 3s on a bad dayAm I crazy for thinking a squad built like the old days of the 90s, one heavy on defense and attacking the paint, would feast against alot of these teams that Jack up 3s?
Yet they score more than the average game of the late 90s and early 2000s, so what are we really talking about
Is 105 points not more than 98 points now, old age is not a reason to not be able to do simple arithmetics
IN 2000 THE LEAGUE AVERAGE WAS
98 PTS ON 84 SHOTS.
BOSTON SCORED 90 PTS
ON 94 SHOTS LAST NIGHT
AND 105 PTS ON 97 SHOTS ON GM 1
YOURE DONE
FIND A NEW LIE TO REPEAT
Is 105 points not more than 98 points now, old age is not a reason to not be able to do simple arithmetics![]()
100 points in regular time is still more than 98
IN OVERTIME ON 97 SHOTS.
YOURE DONE
100 points in regular time is still more than 98![]()
Over the past 10 though? Past season?
SO THEYRE AVERAGING 95 PTS
ON 95 SHOTS OVER THE 1ST 2 GAMES.
THATS NOT MORE THAN
AVERAGING 98 PTS
YOURE DONE
Over the past 10 though? Past season?
I was talking about the 105 points scored, which was what this thread was titled.
Also I’ll take the L for wasting my time on this topic. Didn’t see that it you who posted without those hilarious capitalized colored letters![]()
You can’t certainly believe I think he’ll be posting within reasonLook at this guzzler over here.......
![]()