*Meanwhile in the real world*
Really? You're blaming this on Disney's marketing? Disney? We talking about Disney's marketing?If it wasn't for the coli, I wouldn't even know about this movie. It seems these companies don't know how to market these films cause its not as simple as some of you weirdos think about "LGBTQ backlash." These things sneak under the radar and I hear about them where? The coli. For a slew of folks being anti-LGBTQ, I sure get a lot of news updates from this forum on all things "batty."

To be fair she said 50% minority not alphabet set but you right.I have no problem with Gay characters in movies, but they are clearly being over represented in hollywood at this point. You are making a movie for a much smaller audience but expecting a large audience to show up. Men rarely show up for chick flicks, to the point that romantic comedies are largely seen as a bygone genre, and yet you expect us to show up in droves for lgbtq movies? Lady above claimed she wanted at least 50% of characters to be gay, studies i've seen only show that 7% of audiences identify as such. Some of these movies are successful anyway, like brokeback mountain, but those are outlyers, the demand for these films isn't as high as they think.
Really? You're blaming this on Disney's marketing? Disney? We talking about Disney's marketing?
Ok![]()
Not the film. Not the film. Im talking about the marketing.You think they would learn by now that this gay shyt doesn’t sellwhat I tell you dudes every time
it doesn't work... all this forced gay shyt don't sell
let this shyt flop in peace, don't even gift them a controversy
Every time I hear that explanation, all I hear is they like busting nuts and don’t care who bust nuts with. I have another word for that. I guess I’m ignorant cause I just dont get it.Pansexuality is the romantic, emotional, and/or sexual attraction to people regardless of their gender. Like everyone else, pansexual people may be attracted to some people and not others, but the gender of the person does not matter. People of any gender identity can and do identify as pansexual

I doubt it. Disney has been eating good off of Marvel and Star Wars and continue doing so.It’s quite obvious to see the company is getting cold feet with these movies, the lightyear and onward failures probably opened their eyes because they’ve also opened a hole in their wallets, I wonder if these flops translate into higher Disney world ticket prices? I’m just speculating