The 80/20 Rule: What qualifies you as the 20%?
- Thread starter Ahadi
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 80/20 80/20 rule
yung Herbie Hancock
Funkadelic Parliament
Depends on where you live......Is there a number of box you obtain weekly? Or monthly? That can quantify this?
RaspberryFitted
Boyz In Motion Member
Status: easiest way to do this is being a leader with a followership… somebody everyone else wants to know what their next plan is. Can be obtained by putting yourself out there and building up your social currency. Sport teams, school clubs, community services, frequent bar appearances… linking up with familiar faces often.
Appearance: Genetically or non-genetically, are you someone who oozes the “it” factor? Do you stand out in the crowd. Genetically, either you got it or you don’t
. Non-genetically, you have to maximize what you can control. Grooming and outfit choices.
Finances: Self-explainatory. Can be built overtime but the faster (saving money, investing) the better. Most of the 80% will reach the peak of this in their 30s - 40s, hence why it’s referred to as a man’s “prime years
edit: this is my observation. Who am I to tell what a woman considers 20%.. could be a regular blue collar cat up in the mountains or sum
Appearance: Genetically or non-genetically, are you someone who oozes the “it” factor? Do you stand out in the crowd. Genetically, either you got it or you don’t
. Non-genetically, you have to maximize what you can control. Grooming and outfit choices.Finances: Self-explainatory. Can be built overtime but the faster (saving money, investing) the better. Most of the 80% will reach the peak of this in their 30s - 40s, hence why it’s referred to as a man’s “prime years
edit: this is my observation. Who am I to tell what a woman considers 20%.. could be a regular blue collar cat up in the mountains or sum
Last edited:
UncleTomFord15
Veteran
ThisStatus: easiest way to do this is being a leader with a followership… somebody everyone else wants to know what their next plan is. Can be obtained by putting yourself out there and building up your social currency. Sport teams, school clubs, community services, frequent bar appearances… linking up with familiar faces often.
Appearance: Genetically or non-genetically, are you someone who oozes the “it” factor? Do you stand out in the crowd. Genetically, either you got it or you don’t
Finances: Self-explainatory. Can be built overtime but the faster (saving money, investing) the better. Most of the 80% will reach the peak of this in their 30s - 40s, hence why it’s referred to as a man’s “prime years
edit: this is my observation. Who am I to tell what a woman considers 20%.. could be a regular blue collar cat up in the mountains or sum
This. End thread.Status: easiest way to do this is being a leader with a followership… somebody everyone else wants to know what their next plan is. Can be obtained by putting yourself out there and building up your social currency. Sport teams, school clubs, community services, frequent bar appearances… linking up with familiar faces often.
Appearance: Genetically or non-genetically, are you someone who oozes the “it” factor? Do you stand out in the crowd. Genetically, either you got it or you don’t
Finances: Self-explainatory. Can be built overtime but the faster (saving money, investing) the better. Most of the 80% will reach the peak of this in their 30s - 40s, hence why it’s referred to as a man’s “prime years
edit: this is my observation. Who am I to tell what a woman considers 20%.. could be a regular blue collar cat up in the mountains or sum
If you want to make it more quantitative,
- then 50% more disposable income than your peers (n *1.5). Where n=avg income in your vicinity.
- Leading more men than other men your vicinity
- (n+1) in a small group, where n= avg number of men being lead in your social circle.
- Or in (n+ A) where A represents the absolute threshold of noticibility relative to sample size. This is the statistical point where 50% of all people sampled would notice a difference in intensity/change in your men being lead . And here n= avg number of men being lead in your area.
- On a normal density distribution of height, facial symmetry, skin tone, and swagger
- anything less than probababilty coefficient (p< 20) statistically makes you top 20%.
- This is typically one standard deviation(sigma) and a half to your right if you are following the 68-95-99.7 statistical rule.
-
Yall can tell i had a little too much time on my hands. But its been a while since ive used data analytics/statistics outside of academia so i had fun with it.
Last edited:
Hacksaw Jim Thuggin
Superstar
its not a money thing....and its not something easily quantified...it's subjective....Is there a number of box you obtain weekly? Or monthly? That can quantify this?
whats important in a woman to you might not mean much to me
Hacksaw Jim Thuggin
Superstar
cats breaking out charts....thats not it at all....
This. End thread.
If you want to make it more quantitative,
- then 50% more disposable income than your peers (n *1.5). Where n=avg income in your vicinity.
- Leading more men than other men your vicinity
- (n+1) in a small group, where n= avg number of men being lead in your social circle.
- Or in (n+ A) where A represents the absolute threshold of noticibility relative to sample size. This is the statistical point where 50% of all people sampled would notice a difference in intensity/change in your men being lead . And here n= avg number of men being lead in your area.
- On a normal density distribution of height, facial symmetry, skin tone, and swagger
- anything less than probababilty coefficient (p< 20) statistically makes you top 20%.
- This is typically one standard deviation(sigma) and a half to your right if you are following the 68-95-99.7 statistical rule.
Yall can tell i had a little too much time on my hands. But its been a while since ive used data analytics/statistics outside of academia so i had fun with it.
Breh you took this shyt serious lolYes it is. You can objectively study subjective stimuli/phenomena. There are literally whole sciences devoted to it, most noticeably in sensation-perception theory( branch of nueroscience+psych) and in economics. Some pharmaceuticals are tested this way as well.
But i do agree with you that i went a bit overboard with analytics. In another life i might've been a statistics guy in a lab somewhere.
Yes it is. You can objectively study subjective stimuli/phenomena. There are literally whole sciences devoted to it, most noticeably in sensation-perception theory( branch of nueroscience+psych) and in economics. Some pharmaceuticals are tested this way as well.
But i do agree with you that i went a bit overboard with analytics. In another life i might've been a statistics guy in a lab somewhere.
I thought it was dope. Elevated the conversation and it’s what you enjoy doing.
Talk about in depthThis. End thread.
If you want to make it more quantitative,
- then 50% more disposable income than your peers (n *1.5). Where n=avg income in your vicinity.
- Leading more men than other men your vicinity
- (n+1) in a small group, where n= avg number of men being lead in your social circle.
- Or in (n+ A) where A represents the absolute threshold of noticibility relative to sample size. This is the statistical point where 50% of all people sampled would notice a difference in intensity/change in your men being lead . And here n= avg number of men being lead in your area.
- On a normal density distribution of height, facial symmetry, skin tone, and swagger
- anything less than probababilty coefficient (p< 20) statistically makes you top 20%.
- This is typically one standard deviation(sigma) and a half to your right if you are following the 68-95-99.7 statistical rule.
Yall can tell i had a little too much time on my hands. But its been a while since ive used data analytics/statistics outside of academia so i had fun with it.
Cel 510 kid ados forever
Veteran
Money and looks