The biggest proof evolution isn't real

joeychizzle

光復香港,時代革命
Joined
Apr 3, 2014
Messages
12,078
Reputation
4,175
Daps
32,531
Reppin
852
Because in a world where food is more scarce you might only come across a big pile of high calorie, sugary, fatty and/or meaty goodness once in a while (i.e. the fig tree just hit season for the first time in 6 months)... it makes sense to yam it all up so you've got reserves til next time it fruits. Obviously if you have access to high calorie goodness on tap like we do today you need to replicate the scarcity we evolved for - i.e. forcing yourself NOT to eat the high energy foods all the time and eating more what we would've subsisted on for the rest of the time - seeds, leaves, pulses, beans... stuff you could've foraged reliably 100,000 years ago.

Take your ass to the wilderness and try to forage without eating the wrong shyt and dying within a week. Why the fukk you think we have all this food today? Cuz we figured out it's better to mass produce shyt than have a bunch of hippie mofukkas walk around harvesting shyt and having nowhere near enough food to feed the motherfukking population, which grows at a compound rate in case you forgot. We learned to make shyt easier for ourselves. We don't all have time to harvest organic shyt at the right seasons bruh.

"Forcing yourself to not eat high energy foods"
it is the hallmark of sentient beings to require subsistence on a regular basis. Our brains are built in to find food regularly. If we're hungry and don't reliably know when the next meal is, like our ancestors lived thousands of years ago, we're gonna eat the fukking high energy food. I must make it clear that nobody with a brain will eat high energy foods all the time. Regulation is key.

You can eat on seeds and leaves and mothafukkin beans while I stuff my face with greasy ass cheeseburgers and truffle fries. See who's more satisfied then :camby:
 

TheAlbionist

Superstar
Joined
Jul 31, 2013
Messages
5,725
Reputation
1,175
Daps
15,456
Reppin
London
Take your ass to the wilderness and try to forage without eating the wrong shyt and dying within a week. Why the fukk you think we have all this food today? Cuz we figured out it's better to mass produce shyt than have a bunch of hippie mofukkas walk around harvesting shyt and having nowhere near enough food to feed the motherfukking population, which grows at a compound rate in case you forgot. We learned to make shyt easier for ourselves. We don't all have time to harvest organic shyt at the right seasons bruh.

"Forcing yourself to not eat high energy foods"
it is the hallmark of sentient beings to require subsistence on a regular basis. Our brains are built in to find food regularly. If we're hungry and don't reliably know when the next meal is, like our ancestors lived thousands of years ago, we're gonna eat the fukking high energy food. I must make it clear that nobody with a brain will eat high energy foods all the time. Regulation is key.

You can eat on seeds and leaves and mothafukkin beans while I stuff my face with greasy ass cheeseburgers and truffle fries. See who's more satisfied then :camby:

Cheeseburgers are fine, as long as you don't eat three a day... I'm just explaining there are rational reasons why a lot of "unhealthy" food tastes so good. Because they're not "unhealthy" in natural human existence where they're rare. If you only had one cheeseburger a year for ten years they'd probably be some of the healthiest meals you had. Have three a day for ten years and the opposite is true.

Don't forget to engage your nuance circuits before getting all excited and posting a bunch of drivel. Truth is in shades of grey.




Take your ass to the wilderness and try to forage without eating the wrong shyt and dying within a week.

All our ancestors managed it for several hundred thousand years. That's the only reason we're here. No McDonalds in the wild, kid. :mjlol:
 

joeychizzle

光復香港,時代革命
Joined
Apr 3, 2014
Messages
12,078
Reputation
4,175
Daps
32,531
Reppin
852
Cheeseburgers are fine, as long as you don't eat three a day
Undoubtedly.
I'm just explaining there are rational reasons why a lot of "unhealthy" food tastes so good.
Of course unhealthy aka junk and fast food is delicious. It's engineered that way. It's the only reason we eat it. I'm not gonna eat something unhealthy that doesn't taste nice :francis:
Have three a day for ten years and the opposite is true.
No shyt.
Don't forget to engage your nuance circuits before getting all excited and posting a bunch of drivel. Truth is in shades of grey.
"nuance circuits" aight breh.
Drivel? You call my post drivel? Compared to the original post where the poster claims that plain healthy food and unhealthy delicious food debunks religion? Ok then breh.

All our ancestors managed it for several hundred thousand years. That's the only reason we're here. No McDonalds in the wild, kid.
No shyt. But that's not the point I'm making. Our ancestors could forage, no doubt, because that was basically their only way of getting food save for stumbling upon carrion or a fresh kill.
The average person nowadays doesn't have the skills or knowledge to go out hunting and foraging. Most of us are used to getting our food within an hour, if not minutes. And his proposed method of going out to eat seeds, leaves and other shyt like that simply isn't sustainable. Calorie deficit would be a pretty major concern, not to mention our relatively weak stomachs compared to those who eat that shyt on a regular basis.

take your country of england, for example. How many people in, say, manchester or liverpool are gonna go into the countryside to forage? I mean if you live in somewhere like somerset or dorset, fine, forage away, but when in a city, it becomes a little more difficult.

I'm not saying harvesting nature's produce isn't a good thing. It's great. I'm saying modern society isn't gonna co sign that shyt.

Just imagine a fukking bunch of roadmans going in the forest and trying to find food

"bruv what is this"
some leaf ting innit
"can mans munch on that"
not sure g, take a bit fam
"rahhh this is piff g"
"DUNNO"

and then he dies from poisoning :mjlol:
 

TheAlbionist

Superstar
Joined
Jul 31, 2013
Messages
5,725
Reputation
1,175
Daps
15,456
Reppin
London
No shyt. But that's not the point I'm making. Our ancestors could forage, no doubt, because that was basically their only way of getting food save for stumbling upon carrion or a fresh kill.
The average person nowadays doesn't have the skills or knowledge to go out hunting and foraging. Most of us are used to getting our food within an hour, if not minutes. And his proposed method of going out to eat seeds, leaves and other shyt like that simply isn't sustainable. Calorie deficit would be a pretty major concern, not to mention our relatively weak stomachs compared to those who eat that shyt on a regular basis.

Re-read my first post... I never said that people should actually turn themselves back into foragers - we actually pretty much agree on everything you've said.

if you have access to high calorie goodness on tap like we do today you need to replicate the scarcity we evolved for


My post said that modern people needed to "replicate the scarcity we evolved for" - that doesn't mean never stepping foot in a supermarket or restaurant again, it means mainly eating the healthier foods in the supermarket and restaurants and occasionally letting yourself pig out on burgers and candy rather than mainly pigging out and having the occasional salad.

I definitely didn't say that 7 billion humans can survive in exactly the same way as their uncivilised ancestors did - that really would be drivel - I was very careful to put that "replicate" bit in there. I honestly don't think we actually disagree on much at all here.:obama:

And you're right, the only true drivel in this thread is the idea that Jolly Ranchers are all Darwin needed to show him the folly of his ideas.:russ:
 

joeychizzle

光復香港,時代革命
Joined
Apr 3, 2014
Messages
12,078
Reputation
4,175
Daps
32,531
Reppin
852
Re-read my first post... I never said that people should actually turn themselves back into foragers - we actually pretty much agree on everything you've said.
:ehh:
sorry breh I was skimming a little. still stuck at work although it's 9 fukking pm, took a short break

My post said that modern people needed to "replicate the scarcity we evolved for" - that doesn't mean never stepping foot in a supermarket or restaurant again, it means mainly eating the healthier foods in the supermarket and restaurants and occasionally letting yourself pig out on burgers and candy rather than mainly pigging out and having the occasional salad.
Wholeheartedly agree. Much less junk, smaller portions and generally healthier options are the way forward, but we're too used to flavour and convenience. Like how nando's is gonna get the vote every time when compared to subway. btw they need to bring nando's to hong kong fam. I miss it too much :mjcry:

I definitely didn't say that 7 billion humans can survive in exactly the same way as their uncivilised ancestors did - that really would be drivel - I was very careful to put that "replicate" bit in there. I honestly don't think we actually disagree on much at all here.:obama:
again, I really need to read slower. we've gotta change our eating habits.
And you're right, the only true drivel in this thread is the idea that Jolly Ranchers are all Darwin needed to show him the folly of his ideas.:russ:
:mjlol: the threads on here sometimes are pure gassssss
 
Top