This is what people ignore. Diddy has a history of hyper violence and threats. Why would anyone be shocked that people were shook to cross him?
I acknowledge that fully.
But do you know how many women stay with toxic AND abusive men because they are dikkmatized.
Plus the thing is you dont really know what women like when they really like you. Do yall think all women like swallowing semen or having their eyelashes nutted on? Or are they doing that to satisfy their man. Pleasing their man pleases many women,because they are satisfied and well taken care of,and want to keep that man. Theres a woman somewhere right now taking a Jackie Gleason right hook to the jaw every few nights just because shes so satisfied sexually. I think her abuse should be completely seperated from sex stuff. None of us will truly know if she loved it or not. Why not just charge him with the abuse we know he did.
I had this same issue watching Natureboys case which was very similar to Diddys. Why not charge him with what you know he did(beat up his girl). Rather than the reach to railroad for sex crimes on flimsy evidence.
Which leads me to question what is the motive of the state to get black men on these sex crimes? Either its becauase the penalties are harsher. Or its because the evidence CAN be flimsy,and still make it easier to railroad somebody because you need less evidence. I dont actually have an answer,but the pattern is there