THE DIDDY FEDERAL TRIAL (SENTENCING OCTOBER 8TH)

Whats verdict?

  • Guilty

    Votes: 292 61.2%
  • Not Guilty

    Votes: 185 38.8%

  • Total voters
    477

GunRanger

Veteran
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
32,064
Reputation
4,994
Daps
105,908

THEY ONLY DATED
FOR ABOUT A YEAR AND
BROKE UP AS SOON AS THAT
KID WAS BORN SO IT CLEARLY
WASNT INTENTIONAL.

nikkaS GET WHORES PREGNANT
ALL THE TIME BECAUSE THEY
WANNA GO RAW.
:devil:
:evil:

Nah i remeber that "arrangement" quote too. 50 wanted another kid after the whole Marquise shyt. Thats why this Daphne kid is getting the full inheritance of all his assets. 50 said it himself.
 

Feed-Me

Superstar
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
4,781
Reputation
1,200
Daps
14,050
Reppin
NULL
Theres still diddy defenders in this thread. Yet they all keep avoiding the topic of what Diddy did to Kid cudis dog. They attack the females etc but they leaving that testimony and series of event out the argument.


Diddy stans. Explain to me what he did to that dog?
 

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
38,702
Reputation
3,630
Daps
106,138
Theres still diddy defenders in this thread. Yet they all keep avoiding the topic of what Diddy did to Kid cudis dog. They attack the females etc but they leaving that testimony and series of event out the argument.


Diddy stans. Explain to me what he did to that dog?
There’s no actual proof. Just because Scott says it, doesn’t mean it reaches the government’s burden of proof. Only 2 folks who have personal issues against him testified while perjuring on the stand places him there. It isn’t about the truth, it’s what the government can prove in court.
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
62,746
Reputation
13,478
Daps
404,275
Reppin
CHICAGO

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
38,702
Reputation
3,630
Daps
106,138
They’re playing fast and loose with alot imo. They may have overcharged this one
They. Come to find out, the n166a who charged Puff quit the USA office in December 2024. :russ:
 

CrimsonTider

Seduce & Scheme
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
84,837
Reputation
-13,794
Daps
134,025
This lawyer is speaking facts and this has been my issue all along. What does baby oil have to do with anything? Why do we need to know supposed details of his sex life. Its like asking some one who gets SA'd what positions did the assaulter like the most, doggy or missionary.. Its irrelevant. Whats relevant is whether it was consensual or not. They let Jane doe aka Daphne get up there and talk all day and gossip about gross sexual details that have no relevance to any of the charges just to embarrass him and taint the jury. If you cant keep it to the facts then you got a really weak case.
It’s a very weak case
 

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
38,702
Reputation
3,630
Daps
106,138
This lawyer is speaking facts and this has been my issue all along. What does baby oil have to do with anything? Why do we need to know supposed details of his sex life. Its like asking some one who gets SA'd what positions did the assaulter like the most, doggy or missionary.. Its irrelevant. Whats relevant is whether it was consensual or not. They let Jane doe aka Daphne get up there and talk all day and gossip about gross sexual details that have no relevance to any of the charges just to embarrass him and taint the jury. If you cant keep it to the facts then you got a really weak case.
But these people don’t care about law when you mention this and get B&B Associates
 

spliz

SplizThaDon
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
64,011
Reputation
9,973
Daps
213,181
Reppin
NY all day..Da Stead & BK..
This lawyer is speaking facts and this has been my issue all along. What does baby oil have to do with anything? Why do we need to know supposed details of his sex life. Its like asking some one who gets SA'd what positions did the assaulter like the most, doggy or missionary.. Its irrelevant. Whats relevant is whether it was consensual or not. They let Jane doe aka Daphne get up there and talk all day and gossip about gross sexual details that have no relevance to any of the charges just to embarrass him and taint the jury. If you cant keep it to the facts then you got a really weak case.
Been saying this and so has damn near everyone I know in real life man or woman. U get online and get attacked for saying it tho. nikkas want this cat to go down so bad they aren’t seeing logic. It’s to the point even reporters are questioning this shyt. People expected WAY more than their getting based on all the social media narratives surrounding this nikka over the last year. They thought the parties were the freak offs and I been telling people from the beginning that the freak offs were private sessions between him and Cassie or whatever girl he was with. The parties ain’t even come up in this case. lol. People let their imaginations run wild the whole year.
 

Feed-Me

Superstar
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
4,781
Reputation
1,200
Daps
14,050
Reppin
NULL
There’s no actual proof. Just because Scott says it, doesn’t mean it reaches the government’s burden of proof. Only 2 folks who have personal issues against him testified while perjuring on the stand places him there. It isn’t about the truth, it’s what the government can prove in court.
Ahh. That's the argument. And how were both their stories so exact?


Imagine opening up the phone/laptop and being like, ya know what. I'm gonna defend a rapeist today?
 
Top