THE DIDDY FEDERAL TRIAL (SENTENCING OCTOBER 8TH)

[Reptile]

Threating somebody to make them have sex against their will is sexual coercion breh. A crime. Spin it however you wish that's what they saying he did.

Its not about what they said he did, its about whether or not what they said he did is coercion; which it isnt. Stop being slow.

 

[Theodoresolderbreh]

Its not about what they said he did, its about whether or not what they said he did is coercion; which it isnt. Stop being slow.

They dont need to say shyt they have it in text messages. he laid it out for them.

 

[LuuqMaan]

She just called him a ‘cuck’ on record.

And that he might be bisexual.

There’s no ‘might’ in Diddys case

 

[nieman]

Fam..

Every second of the day we are coerced ..
By our wives..
Bosses..

Almost everything has a "Do this if you want to continue these benefits"..

Idk.. maybe you are a 6 cert cat who dont care if yo chic does anything..

But.. if you paid all the bills in the house ..
You assume your wife will do her part and make it a home.. clean.. cook.. whatever..

Now if she said

I'm not cleaning or cooking.. you not going keep paying the bills with her living there..

Now is that coercion?

Just because something is "normalized" doesn't mean it's morally just or even legal. If your boss presents you with such a proposition, you can file complaints, and even for ridiculous requests work related, you file with the DOL. It's simple.

Once they bring sex into it, there's an entire different set of parameters. it's why a lot of employers have policies against it. At any time, if a woman says no or is hesitant and your persuade them or hold something over their head, or threaten them in any type of way to get it, you're in danger of being accused of rape. It doesn't have to be forcefully.

What reason did Cassie have to lie? She was already paid. Bruh. Yall nikkas don’t see the integrity issues any of these people have on the stand is wild. And I’m including Diddy. Clearly everyone was wit the shyts until they wasn’t. Cassie deserved every penny she got but outside of that throw this shyt in the bushes. People already feeling stupid that the case ain’t as sensational as nikkas made it out to be for a whole year prior.

Herein lies the problem. Once they're no longer with it, and it continues to happen, and the additional threats, manipulation, coersion - there's a crime committed. All it takes it 1 "no" and something happens against your will. The issues here with Puff are the actions that happened after they said no. That's what the prosecution is going after, while the defense is playing the "willingly participant angle."

 

[L. Deezy]

Shaniqua dropped a bomb of truth.

You can’t troll your way out of this one

got damn

 

[L. Deezy]

She just called him a ‘cuck’ on record.

And that he might be bisexual.

There’s no ‘might’ in Diddys case

wait what?? lmaooo

 

[spliz]

Just because something is "normalized" doesn't mean it's morally just or even legal. If your boss presents you with such a proposition, you can file complaints, and even for ridiculous requests work related, you file with the DOL. It's simple.

Once they bring sex into it, there's an entire different set of parameters. it's why a lot of employers have policies against it. At any time, if a woman says no or is hesitant and your persuade them or hold something over their head, or threaten them in any type of way to get it, you're in danger of being accused of rape. It doesn't have to be forcefully.


Herein lies the problem. Once they're no longer with it, and it continues to happen, and the additional threats, manipulation, coersion - there's a crime committed. All it takes it 1 "no" and something happens against your will. The issues here with Puff are the actions that happened after they said no. That's what the prosecution is going after, while the defense is playing the "willingly participant angle."

nikka. These are all grown ass people. U don’t wanna do something. Don’t do it. It’s that simple. U can’t remove consent AFTER the fact. Life doesn’t work like that.

 

[DarkandHellisHot]

wait what?? lmaooo

I did not find it on CNN live feed but NBC reported it

'Jane' was curious about Combs' need to see her with another man

"Jane" testified that she came to understand that Combs’ desire to see her having intercourse with another man was an exercise of sexual curiosity.

"I was trying to figure out the relationship and I came upon the word, cuckold, a man turned on by watching his woman having sex with another man," Jane told the court. "I just wanted to know what was driving him."

Jane said she believed it could've been an interest in bisexuality, but Combs might've been "too scared to do the act" himself, making these "freak offs" the next closest alternative.

 

[EzekelRAGE]

Who we thinking ?

Probably this pastor


"Next time you apply Anton's semen on me, Ima sing just like this"

Spoiler

 

[DarkandHellisHot]

'Jane' invoked the names of basketball greats to talk about her sex life with Combs, she testified

"Jane" testified that she invoked the names of two all-time basketball greats to describe her sex life with Combs and someone named Paul.

The three of them were the "trifecta," Jane said, with a nod to Hall of Fame hoopsters.

"I was Kobe Bryant and Paul was Shaq (Shaquille O’Neal)," Jane said. "Combs was Michael Jordan."

What thype of shyt is this brehs

 

[Theodoresolderbreh]

Fam..

Every second of the day we are coerced ..
By our wives..
Bosses..

Almost everything has a "Do this if you want to continue these benefits"..

Idk.. maybe you are a 6 cert cat who dont care if yo chic does anything..

But.. if you paid all the bills in the house ..
You assume your wife will do her part and make it a home.. clean.. cook.. whatever..

Now if she said

I'm not cleaning or cooking.. you not going keep paying the bills with her living there..

Now is that coercion?

If you rape your wife that's still a crime. If you threatening to take her home away from her from unless she sucking and fukking that a crime. marital rape.. in California where they are btw they treat that shyt the same way they do normal rape if we are talking about sexual crimes.

 

[EzekelRAGE]

Jane said she believed it could've been an interest in bisexuality, but Combs might've been "too scared to do the act" himself, making these "freak offs" the next closest alternative.

That actually make a lot of sense. He wishes he was with the men and he fantasizes that they fukking him

That's why when she threw up that other time and quit he was like "How could you embarass me in front of Anton like that"

 

[DarkandHellisHot]

Jane says she doesn't think Combs' workers saw them with "entertainers" during deliveries

Just before the lunch break, Jane said she didn’t think any of Sean “Diddy” Combs’ employees saw that she and Combs were with an “entertainer” at times when they delivered cash to a hotel room.

Jane said she didn’t think the employees ever came inside the hotel rooms in the middle of a sexual encounter.

Jane also testified she didn’t believe Kristina Khorram, Combs’ then-chief of staff, knew about the “hotel nights” with “entertainers.” She also confirmed that Combs specifically didn’t want Khorram to know when he was partying because she disapproved and wanted him to focus more on his business.

 

[BiggWebb79]

 

[EzekelRAGE]

Looks like he took a break and wasnt kicked out. We'll see 2mrw i guess

Definitely dont follow the trial using a tweeter profile with the name "Diddy Daily" tho. They not even posting the transcripts of what's being said, looks like summarizing shyt