THE DIDDY FEDERAL TRIAL [UPDATE: FIF in his feelings over his baby momma going on stand talking bout trains PUFF ran on her]

Whats verdict?

  • Guilty

    Votes: 235 63.5%
  • Not Guilty

    Votes: 135 36.5%

  • Total voters
    370

EzekelRAGE

Superstar
Joined
Jul 22, 2015
Messages
15,746
Reputation
3,850
Daps
54,473
735e87138018c870e9f2f4ed16185b3f.png

:unimpressed:
 

EzekelRAGE

Superstar
Joined
Jul 22, 2015
Messages
15,746
Reputation
3,850
Daps
54,473
Not gonna lie, unless they have some crazy defense planned, his questioning of these witnesses has been weak.
Only thing I can think of is they gonna call a witness a week or two from now to say Puff didnt have a gun. That's the only way this line of questioning makes sense. As it stands they really have poked a hole in the kidnapping shyt, they dispute the being held for 5 days thing either.
 

Barney Rubble

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
3,909
Reputation
2,894
Daps
17,815
Reppin
NULL
Only thing I can think of is they gonna call a witness a week or two from now to say Puff didnt have a gun. That's the only way this line of questioning makes sense. As it stands they really have poked a hole in the kidnapping shyt, they dispute the being held for 5 days thing either.
They brought up another dude being given a lie detector, so they're probably gonna call him and ask if he was kidnapped, too. He's gonna say no, and that's gonna be their defense. But, she never said they were there together.
 

krazykid18

Superstar
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
7,023
Reputation
-1,201
Daps
20,414
Reppin
NULL
Behaving like an animal in a thread about sexual abuse :what:



Pull your skirt up b, you sound like the type to hold your wife's hand while she is getting a train ran on her asking her if she is okay ...

Some of yall need help, let the case play out yall watch law and order and suits and now yall think yall know the strategy let it play out whether you are against DIddy or for Diddy just let the case play out because 90% of yall had ASAP Rocky going to jail and Tory lanez coming home
 

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
38,416
Reputation
3,600
Daps
105,570
They didn't refute that she was kidnapped TWICE. They didn't refute that she saw Puff and his bodyguards break into cudi's house. They didn't prove Puff wasn't carrying a gun and threatening her. :francis:
You do know the defense have their own witnesses? We don’t know that there may be testimony to debunk those statements.
 

EzekelRAGE

Superstar
Joined
Jul 22, 2015
Messages
15,746
Reputation
3,850
Daps
54,473
They didn't refute that she was kidnapped TWICE. They didn't refute that she saw Puff and his bodyguards break into cudi's house. They didn't prove Puff wasn't carrying a gun and threatening her. :francis:
Didnt dispute Puff told her to tell Cudi not to get the police involved. Didnt call her out for telling Cudi "He will hurt us all if you talk to the police. It seemed like that wouldve been an easy statement to catch her in a lie, but it seems like they didnt even bother to touch it.

The only time they tried to dispute the kidnapping was this:
d63445e41b14f74c69393e22b280ee7d.png

And she killed them with that response.

Let’s wait on the cross. The government ask questions a specific way to get us hype

Because she said it, it’s true?

Corroborated. Who can’t get on that stand and be coached to say keywords and corroborate? It’s all out there. That’s literally how these civil suits work. When they get crossed, they trip up thus this trial being a toss up.

hat was an example and committing perjury isn’t the issue. The AUSA is asking questions a specific way and I believe folks would lie by omission. Leaving out key facts that the cross has to dig out.
So what are your thoughts on how this cross went in regards to disputing the kidnapping/threats/beating etc?
 
Top