Only thing I can think of is they gonna call a witness a week or two from now to say Puff didnt have a gun. That's the only way this line of questioning makes sense. As it stands they really have poked a hole in the kidnapping shyt, they dispute the being held for 5 days thing either.Not gonna lie, unless they have some crazy defense planned, his questioning of these witnesses has been weak.
They brought up another dude being given a lie detector, so they're probably gonna call him and ask if he was kidnapped, too. He's gonna say no, and that's gonna be their defense. But, she never said they were there together.Only thing I can think of is they gonna call a witness a week or two from now to say Puff didnt have a gun. That's the only way this line of questioning makes sense. As it stands they really have poked a hole in the kidnapping shyt, they dispute the being held for 5 days thing either.
Sounds like she was hurt Diddy would caste her aside when she been covering shyt up for him.Her testimony is starting to look a little shakey. Sounds like she was lowkey in love with Diddy.
Behaving like an animal in a thread about sexual abuse
You do know the defense have their own witnesses? We don’t know that there may be testimony to debunk those statements.They didn't refute that she was kidnapped TWICE. They didn't refute that she saw Puff and his bodyguards break into cudi's house. They didn't prove Puff wasn't carrying a gun and threatening her.![]()
Didnt dispute Puff told her to tell Cudi not to get the police involved. Didnt call her out for telling Cudi "He will hurt us all if you talk to the police. It seemed like that wouldve been an easy statement to catch her in a lie, but it seems like they didnt even bother to touch it.They didn't refute that she was kidnapped TWICE. They didn't refute that she saw Puff and his bodyguards break into cudi's house. They didn't prove Puff wasn't carrying a gun and threatening her.![]()
Let’s wait on the cross. The government ask questions a specific way to get us hype
Because she said it, it’s true?
Corroborated. Who can’t get on that stand and be coached to say keywords and corroborate? It’s all out there. That’s literally how these civil suits work. When they get crossed, they trip up thus this trial being a toss up.
So what are your thoughts on how this cross went in regards to disputing the kidnapping/threats/beating etc?hat was an example and committing perjury isn’t the issue. The AUSA is asking questions a specific way and I believe folks would lie by omission. Leaving out key facts that the cross has to dig out.