The ‘Hell No’ Caucus: Some Democrats May Not Work With Donald Trump At All

Skooby

Alone In My Zone
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
25,693
Reputation
10,770
Daps
60,725
Reppin
The Cosmos
The 'Hell No' Caucus: Some Democrats May Not Work With Donald Trump At All | The Huffington Post

The ‘Hell No’ Caucus: Some Democrats May Not Work With Donald Trump At All

On anything.

WASHINGTON ― Democratic leaders in Congress said this week that if they can find common ground with President-elect Donald Trump, they’re willing to work with him. But at least a few House Democrats say they won’t work with Trump on anything, or that they’re close to taking that hard-line approach.

“There’s nothing there,” Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) told The Huffington Post on Thursday. “He doesn’t use power properly.”

Gallego said Trump has caused too much damage with his hateful rhetoric for him to be able to work with or trust him. Even collaborating on Democratic priorities would only empower the president-elect to do other things that Democrats firmly oppose, he argued.

“While we may be able to pass an infrastructure bill, he’s going to use that power to push his racist, bigoted agenda on the other end,” Gallego said.

He said there are others in his caucus who plan to refuse any cooperation with the president-elect, but he wouldn’t name names or say how many. “More than you can count on one hand,” he said.

Rep. Katherine Clark (D-Mass.) said she needs proof that Trump can rise to the level of the office of the presidency before she can commit to working with him. He’s not off to a good start in her eyes, with his choice of Breitbart News executive chairman Steve Bannon as a senior White House adviser. Bannon led the website as it became a platform for the white nationalist “alt-right” movement, and his appointment drew praise from former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke.

“The indications are that Donald Trump does not plan to live up to be a president for all Americans,” Clark said. “I find that a concerning first step.”

“I’m not saying I’m going to work with the guy, I’m not saying I’m not going to work with him,” she added. “But I’ll tell you this: I have a healthy, not only dose of skepticism, but fear that he is going to continue with those themes, based on his appointment of Steve Bannon.”

Democratic lawmakers are in a pickle. They’ve got Trump in the White House for the next four years and next to no leverage in Congress, which is completely under GOP control. One of the few bright spots is that Trump is a wild card, and he’s singled out a few priorities ― investments in rebuilding roads and highways, raising the minimum wage and trade deals ― that resonate with Democrats. So they can either try to team up with him on those areas, and potentially railroad some Republicans in the process, or fight him on everything he does.

Progressive groups are pressuring Democrats to reject Trump outright. “MoveOn to Democrats: No Collaboration With Trump’s Hate,” reads the subject line of a Thursday email with a scathing statement from the grassroots group, issued after Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) signaled a willingness to work with the president-elect in some areas.

“It is unacceptable for Democratic leadership to normalize Trump and collaborate with him so long as he continues his bigotry, hatred, and division,” said MoveOn executive director Ilya Sherman. “Requiring grassroots progressives to divert their energy to holding Democrats accountable would be a serious mistake.”

Some progressive lawmakers are trying to keep an open mind. Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), who is running to lead the Democratic National Committee next year, said he’s willing to “take a careful look” at Trump’s ideas that help working families.

It’s just that he’s not optimistic.

“That’s not that campaign he ran, and I don’t think that’ll be the administration he leads,” Ellison said. “The President-elect ran on deporting millions of people, building a wall on the Mexican border, lowering taxes on the super-rich, and banning Muslims from entering the country. If he governs the way he campaigned, I’ll be the first standing in his way.”

Similarly, Rep. John Sarbanes (D-Md.) said he’s “not going to reject” something Trump proposes if it aligns with Democratic priorities.

“But I would say overall that that will come against the backdrop of us being rightly, fairly, justifiably very skeptical of the things he’s about to do,” he said. “And prepared to resist them.”
 

ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ

Doctors without Labcoats
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,180
Reputation
-2,215
Daps
14,762
Reppin
Payments accepted Obamacare,paypal and livestock
2da4bc05eabc5684b26738630df9f1cb.png


Potential midterm victims...Theyre gambling he wont be successful...if he is their own constituents will run them out with pitchforks in 2018 and 2020
 

Celerii

Picture me rollin', sixes, money foldin'
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
1,019
Reputation
-365
Daps
3,760
Reppin
igboland
I wouldnt either. He's a joke, not a president.
though i do agree that trump is a moron, if he wants to pursue some things that are progressive, democrats should obviously work with him. i also think people who say that he isn't their president need to stop being childish. whether we like it or not, we are going to have to work with trump and i can't stand a do-nothing-congress for the next four years.
 

GoddamnyamanProf

Countdown to Armageddon
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,793
Reputation
819
Daps
106,214
though i do agree that trump is a moron, if he wants to pursue some things that are progressive, democrats should obviously work with him. i also think people who say that he isn't their president need to stop being childish. whether we like it or not, we are going to have to work with trump and i can't stand a do-nothing-congress for the next four years.
Doing nothing is infinitely better than doing all the regressive dumb shyt his team has planned.
 

GoddamnyamanProf

Countdown to Armageddon
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,793
Reputation
819
Daps
106,214
i think we should work with him when he proposes progressive things and reject him when he wants to support bigotry. simple. :smile:
That's something to ponder after he proposes his first piece of progressive legislature.

I bet we never have to consider it.
 
Top