The Liberal Tears When Hillary Starts Implementing Her Policies :banderas:

Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
193,419
Reputation
25,292
Daps
624,113
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
@Abogado I don't believe Texas will ever be a toss up like some are predicting, I don't think Georgia will be in play either.. Georgia will still back Trump by a good size margin come election day. Those will continue to be GOP strongholds, but there is a very small margin of error for the pubs moving forward. They will be fine in the house and that will continue to save them but Presidential elections are looking grim.
 

PikaDaDon

Thunderbolt Them Suckers
Joined
Oct 13, 2012
Messages
9,359
Reputation
2,324
Daps
25,321
Reppin
NULL
ik46jOJ.png
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
16,436
Reputation
4,548
Daps
44,709
Hey @tru_m.a.c
There is a lot more overlap between Trump and Sanders than most liberals are willing to admit, because it's a scary proposition for them. There is plenty of shared space for a candidate to pop up, speaking to both Trump and Sanders' constituencies.
Just as much as, if not more than, Sanders, Trump has made political bribery a core issue in his campaign. From the first Republican Primary debate when he called out every other Republican candidate as being bought off to the last Presidential debate we just saw when he called out Hillary for being beholden to the donor class, he's been consistent in his critique of money in politics.

The point isn't that Trump is secretly a progressive Democrat, it's that due to certain historical and socio-economic factors, the traditional Republican-Democrat paradigm is becoming increasingly irrelevant. So whereas someone looking through that outdated lens would see Trump on the far right, Clinton in the middle, and Sanders on the far left, a more up-to-date analysis would show that Trump and Sanders are actually tapping into similar underlying factors to paint their political picture. If you were to do a word-match from all of the candidates rallies and speeches, you'd find a closer correlation between Trump and Sanders than Clinton and Sanders. Words like "rigged", "corrupt", "special interests", "donors", "NAFTA", "TPP" show up frequently in both Trump and Sanders' wheelhouse. And those are the words both of their supporters most latch on to. Don't get it twisted, Sanders campaign wasn't some big corporate diversity pitch. That was Clinton's, which is why she can so easily paint an oppositional narrative to Trump. The protests Sanders' supporters launched on the floor of the DNC wasn't about getting more women's representation in media or using politically correct terminology about immigration and islam, it was criticizing damaging trade deals and the war machine. On which side of those issues is Trump on? That's right. Ultimately, Sanders was talking about material changes to the underlying structure of American society, which is what Trump is talking about, which is why he's been namechecking Bernie every time he opens his mouth over the past few months.

What Sanders and Trump were doing was stepping outside that box, speaking to underlying elements of not only the economy, but the entire political system, which is why they both of their campaigns had to be funded in large part by millions of small, individual donations, yet another natural link between the two.

What are you talking about? Progressives need an expanded domestic budget. Trump's plans DO NOT COVER PROGRESSIVE DOMESTIC POLICY. For example, Trump is running on repealing the ACA correct? The ACA is a domestic program correct? The ACA covers medicare and medicaid expansions correct? So why would a progressive look the other way because Trump falsely claims to be anti-establishment - a narrative that no one but Trump supporters believes.



But hey, I guess this is why I'm 15 and not American.

e908da92c754965b60b6a8c13b0be696.png
 
Last edited:
Top