MischievousMonkey
Gor bu dëgër
I'm talking about race.They aren’t radicalized as Arab, they are actual Arabs.
I'm talking about race.They aren’t radicalized as Arab, they are actual Arabs.
But in reality a lot in those eastern/northern areas in Africa associate Islam with Arabs and Middle Easterners, so a lot believe themselves to be that + when you mix in phenotypes. Same mfs committing the atrocities would be treated less than dirt across the Red Sea. The Indian Ocean slave trade was/is real.This is correct! However, history and Arab and Islam brainwashing comes into play. The vast majority of Sudanese so called arabs are indigenous African. Arabization of Sudan and the slave trade created a social hierachy. Those that were Muslim were at the top and animist or Christian blacks at the bottom. Same as Philippinos claiming to be Latinos/Spanish. I remember someone telling me a story of two black Sudanese refusing to be identified as black at London Heatrow airport security paper forms by insisting they were arabs.Racial categories vary depending on the context. The way race is perceived in America is different in other parts of the world.
Have you heard about the controversy about the South African singer Tyla not considering herself black but colored? Or dark-skinned Dominicans not seeing themselves as black in the US? Or Africans sometimes seeing mixed and very light-skinned folks as white?
Same thing in Sudan. You can have darker skin and some stereotypical african features but still be racialized as arab rather than black in Sudan.
Racially they are black Arabs, the original Arabs.I'm talking about race.
There is no such thing as Arabized Africans. Black African Arabs existed and lived throughout Arabia and North Africa before been displaced by the conquest of asiatic Arabs that occupy these lands now. That’s partially the reason for these conflicts. The Sudanese Arabs were former nomadic tribes that have moved into lands populated by established African populations. They’re trying to displace Sudanese people from their own land.They are arabized Africans, that's why.
Genetically they are predominantly African, but have varying degrees of Arab admixture, but culturally, they are Arabs.
The Janjaweeds are mostly Abbala arabs who do have some origins in the Arabian peninsula, so they might not be indigenous in your book.This is correct! However, history and Arab and Islam brainwashing comes into play. The vast majority of Sudanese so called arabs are indigenous African. Arabization of Sudan and the slave trade created a social hierachy. Those that were Muslim were at the top and animist or Christian blacks at the bottom. Same as Philippinos claiming to be Latinos/Spanish. I remember someone telling me a story of two black Sudanese refusing to be identified as black at London Heatrow airport security paper forms by insisting they were arabs.
Well no, they're not racially black in the sudanese context. They're only black if you see it from a western lens.Racially they are black Arabs, the original Arabs.


There are multiple layers:Arab nations are fueling tribal wars by providing the tools of genocide........
Arabs are not native to Africa.There is no such thing as Arabized Africans. Black African Arabs existed and lived throughout Arabia and North Africa before been displaced by the conquest of asiatic Arabs that occupy these lands now. That’s partially the reason for these conflicts. The Sudanese Arabs were former nomadic tribes that have moved into lands populated by established African populations. They’re trying to displace Sudanese people from their own land.