This is big: Anti-Fracking Win in N.Y. Court May Deal Blow to Industry

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
92,331
Reputation
3,851
Daps
164,806
Reppin
Brooklyn
By Chris Dolmetsch, Freeman Klopott and Jim Efstathiou Jr. Jun 30, 2014 6:12 PM ET
34 Comments Email Print
Save
i3I03JbyW.Hc.jpg



June 30 (Bloomberg) -- Bloomberg’s Betty Liu reports that New York State’s highest court ruled that towns and cities can block hydraulic fracturing within their borders, upholding a six-year-old statewide moratorium on the practice. She speaks on “In The Loop.”
New York’s cities and towns can block hydraulic fracturing within their borders, the state’s highest court ruled, dealing a blow to an industry awaiting Governor Andrew Cuomo’s decision on whether to lift a six-year-old statewide moratorium.

The case, closely watched by the energy industry, may invigorate local challenges to fracking in other states and convince the industry to stay out of New York even if Cuomo allows drilling. Pennsylvania’s highest court issued a similar ruling last year, striking down portions of a state law limiting localities’ ability to regulate drillers.

“This sends a really strong and clear message to the gas companies who have tried to buy their way into the state that these community concerns have to be addressed,” Katherine Nadeau, policy director for Environmental Advocates ofNew York, an anti-fracking group, said in a phone interview. “This will empower more communities nationwide.”

Related:

The ruling may lead the oil and gas companies to further abandon efforts to extract gas in New York, said Thomas West, an attorney for Norse Energy, one of the companies in the case.

“It’s going to have a real chilling effect on the investment in New York,” he said in a phone interview. “Most of the major companies are not going to see New York as open for business if they have to develop the resource around municipalities with bans.”


Photographer: Spencer Platt/Getty Images
The ruling may lead the oil and gas industry to abandon fracking in New York as... Read More

Town’s Character
By a 5-2 vote, the Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of lawsuits challenging bans in the upstate towns of Dryden and Middlefield. The towns engaged in a “reasonable exercise” of zoning authority when they banned oil and gas extraction and production, Judge Victoria Graffeo wrote.

The towns were within their rights to find that drilling “would permanently alter and adversely affect the deliberately cultivated small-town character of their communities,” she said.

The ruling is “one more nail in the coffin” for fracking in the state, Brad Gill, executive director of the Independent Oil and Gas Association of New York, said in a phone interview. Chesapeake Energy Corp. and other firms that divested New York assets “could see the writing on the wall.”

Fracking, as hydraulic fracturing is known, is the creation of fractures in rocks and rock formations by injecting fluid into cracks. The larger fissures allow more oil and gas to flow out of the formation to be carried to the surface.

Marcellus Shale
The process, used in states from North Dakota to Pennsylvania, has helped push U.S. natural gas production to new highs in each of the past seven years, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. It has also come under attack from environmental advocates, who fear it may contaminate water supplies and destroy farmland.

Parts of New York sit above the Marcellus Shale, a rock formation that the Energy Information Administration estimates may hold enough natural gas to meet the demands of the U.S. market for almost six years. The state barred fracking in 2008 while studying the environmental effects of the drilling method, which is allowed in more than 30 states.

Since then, more than 75 New York towns have banned fracking while more than 40 have passed resolutions stating they support it or are open to it, according to Karen Edelstein, an Ithaca consultant affiliated with FracTracker Alliance, which analyzes the effects of oil and gas drilling.

Seismic Monitors
With the U.S. poised to surge past Saudi Arabia as the world’s largest supplier of oil in 2015, states are now regulating the drilling process.

In Ohio, new permitting rules require placement of seismic monitors and a shutdown of drilling in the event of an earthquake. In Colorado, where at least five communities voted to restrict fracking, rules to limit the release of methane have been put in place, and the state may give local governments the right to ban or restrict oil and gas drilling.

California and Illinois have moved to require companies to identify the chemicals that are forced below ground to bust up the shale.

“Practically speaking, municipal-fracking bans in New York may have little more than symbolic value given that state fracking policy has been on hold since 2008,” Christine Tezak, managing director atClearView Energy Partners LLC, a Washington-based energy consultant, said in a research note.

Dryden, Middlefield
“On the other hand, today’s finding has potential to be a powerful symbol, as it represents a second court ruling upholding municipal primacy in a state overlying the Marcellus Shale,” she wrote, citing the Pennsylvania decision.

Dryden, a town of about 14,000 residents about an hour’s drive south of Syracuse, and Middlefield, a town of about 2,000 about 75 miles further east, passed bans on oil and gas exploration in 2011.

Later that year, Anschutz Exploration Corp., an affiliate of billionaire Philip Anschutz’s closely held company that had bought about 22,000 acres worth of gas leases, challenged Dryden’s ban. Norse Energy Corp. ASA, a Lysaker, Norway-based explorer whose U.S. unit filed for bankruptcy in December 2012, later replaced Anschutz Exploration as plaintiff.

A dairy farm that had signed leases to explore and develop resources under its property sued Middlefield.

Beyond Zoning
Attorneys for the towns said they have the right to enact zoning laws as long as they don’t interfere with state oil-and-gas regulations. Industry lawyers said New York’s Oil, Gas and Solution Mining Law superseded the local bans.

Separate judges in 2012 dismissed the lawsuits challenging the local bans. Those rulings were upheld by an intermediate appeals court last year and again today by the Albany-based Court of Appeals.

Two judges dissented. The zoning ordinances “go above and beyond zoning and, instead, regulate those industries, which is exclusively within the purview of the Department of Environmental Conservation,” Judge Eugene Pigott wrote.

“We’re just going to have to do the best we can with those towns and municipalities that want us,” Gill, of the Hamburg-based Independent Oil and Gas Association, said. “It creates a patchwork of green lights.”

New Claim
Anschutz is “in the process of selling assets, surrendering leased lands and exiting New York,” Brent Temmer, a spokesman for the closely-held company, said in an e-mail. Lindsay McIntyre, a Chesapeake spokeswoman, didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment on its New York holdings.

Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM), the largest U.S. gas producer, controls drilling rights across 43,000 acres in two New York counties, said Suann Lundsberg, a spokeswoman for the company’s XTO Energy subsidiary. Exxon paid about $8 million in New York state taxes last year and has no employees in the state, according to the company.

West, the lawyer for Norse Energy, said property owners may challenge the bans as an illegal “taking.”

“The government is not supposed to take your private property without just compensation,” he said. “If they ban gas development, the landowners are entitled to be compensated for the mineral rights they have lost.”

Scott Kurkoski, the lawyer for the Middlefield farm, urged Cuomo to issue a final ruling on the statewide moratorium and to allow development to proceed in towns where it’s favored.

Cuomo is seeking to balance the prospect of economic development as seen in Ohio and Pennsylvania against claims by environmental groups that drilling is harmful. His spokesman, Rich Azzopardi, didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Joe Martens, head of New York’s Environmental Conservation Department, has said he won’t issue fracking regulations until at least April 2015, signaling that Cuomo, a Democrat, probably won’t make a decision before he faces re-election in November.

The cases are Cooperstown Holstein Corp. v. Town of Middlefield, 1700930/2011, New York Supreme Court, Otsego County (Cooperstown); and Anschutz Exploration Corp. v. Dryden, 902/2011, New York Supreme Court, Tompkins County (Ithaca).

To contact the reporters on this story: Chris Dolmetsch in New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan at

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-...king-oil-industry-loss.html?cmpid=fb.campaign
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
51,421
Reputation
5,293
Daps
115,963
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2014/05/north-carolina-felony-fracking-chemicals-disclosure

North Carolina GOP Pushes Unprecedented Bill to Jail Anyone Who Discloses Fracking Chemicals
—By Molly Redden

| Mon May 19, 2014 10:15 AM EDT

As hydraulic fracturing ramps up around the country, so do concerns about its health impacts. These concerns have led 20 states to require the disclosure of industrial chemicals used in the fracking process.

North Carolina isn't on that list of states yet—and it may be hurtling in the opposite direction.

On Thursday, three Republican state senators introduced a bill that would slap a felony charge on individuals who disclosed confidential information about fracking chemicals. The bill, whose sponsors include a member of Republican party leadership, establishes procedures for fire chiefs and health care providers to obtain chemical information during emergencies. But as the trade publication Energywire notedFriday, individuals who leak information outside of emergency settings could be penalized with fines and several months in prison.


"The felony provision is far stricter than most states' provisions in terms of the penalty for violating trade secrets," says Hannah Wiseman, a Florida State University assistant law professor who studies fracking regulations.

The bill also allows companies that own the chemical information to require emergency responders to sign a confidentiality agreement. And it's not clear what the penalty would be for a health care worker or fire chief who spoke about their experiences with chemical accidents to colleagues.

"I think the only penalties to fire chiefs and doctors, if they talked about it at their annual conference, would be the penalties contained in the confidentiality agreement," says Wiseman. "But [the bill] is so poorly worded, I cannot confirm that if an emergency responder or fire chief discloses that confidential information, they too would not be subject to a felony." In some sections, she says, "That appears to be the case."

The disclosure of the chemicals used to break up shale formations and release natural gas is one of the most heated issues surrounding fracking. Many energy companies argue that the information should be proprietary, while public health advocates counter that they can't monitor for environmental and health impacts without it. Under public pressure, a few companies have begun to report chemicals voluntarily.

North Carolina has banned fracking until the state can approve regulations. The bill introduced Thursday, titled the Energy Modernization Act, is meant to complement the rules currently being written by the North Carolina Mining & Energy Commission.

Wiseman adds that, other than the felony provision, the bill proposes disclosure laws similar to those in many other states: "It allows for trade secrets to remain trade secrets, it provides only limited exceptions for reasons of emergency and health problems, and provides penalties for failure to honor the trade secret."

Draft regulations from the North Carolina commission have been praised as some of the strongest fracking rules in the country. But observers already worry that the final regulations will be significantly weaker. In early May, the commission put off approving a near-final chemical disclosure rule because Haliburton, which has huge stakes in the fracking industry, complained the proposal was too strict, the News & Observer reported.

For portions of the Republican-controlled North Carolina government to kowtow to the energy industry is not surprising. In February, the Associated Press reported that under Republican Gov. Pat McCrory, North Carolina's top environmental regulators previously thwarted three separate Clean Water Act lawsuits aimed at forcing Duke Energy, the largest electricity utility in the country, to clean up its toxic coal ash pits in the state. Had those lawsuits been allowed to progress, they may have prevented the February rupture of a coal ash storage pond, which poured some 80,000 tons of coal ash into the Dan River.

"Environmental groups say they favor some of the provisions [in the Energy Modernization Act]," Energywire reported Friday. "It would put the state geologist in charge of maintaining the chemical information and would allow the state's emergency management office to use it for planning. It also would allow the state to turn over the information immediately to medical providers and fire chiefs."

However, environmentalists point out that the bill would also prevent local governments from passing any rules on fracking and limit water testing that precedes a new drilling operation.
 
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
3,960
Reputation
950
Daps
8,302
Reppin
NYC
People want the US to stop meddling into the affairs of countries in the Middle East but they also want to be able to drive their cars everywhere. Growth in fracking is just an intermediate step in the path towards energy independence.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
92,331
Reputation
3,851
Daps
164,806
Reppin
Brooklyn
People want the US to stop meddling into the affairs of countries in the Middle East but they also want to be able to drive their cars everywhere. Growth in fracking is just an intermediate step in the path towards energy independence.

I can live putting nearly 5$ a gallon 93 octane in my car, I can't live without water.
 

unit321

Hong Kong Phooey
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
22,213
Reputation
1,732
Daps
23,106
Reppin
USA
I can live putting nearly 5$ a gallon 93 octane in my car, I can't live without water.
Plus fracking is used to get natural gas, not crude oil.

A lot of well water problems in Pennsylvania. A lot of people are caking by allowing drilling in their property, but there are others who depend on well-water who are screwed.
 
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
3,960
Reputation
950
Daps
8,302
Reppin
NYC
I can live putting nearly 5$ a gallon 93 octane in my car, I can't live without water.
:manny: Water is overrated
Plus fracking is used to get natural gas, not crude oil.

A lot of well water problems in Pennsylvania. A lot of people are caking by allowing drilling in their property, but there are others who depend on well-water who are screwed.
Oil is extracted through fracking as well
 

unit321

Hong Kong Phooey
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
22,213
Reputation
1,732
Daps
23,106
Reppin
USA
:manny: Water is overrated

Oil is extracted through fracking as well
Yeah, I know. However, I think they've tapped out crude oil reserves.
I don't know if you know, Pennzoil and Quaker State originated in Pennsylvania when they were drilling for oil in that state. This is mega-decades ago. When they refined the oil, just like existing refineries, they extract different fuels. At the time, they didn't know of any use for kerosene.... so they threw it away. :wtf:
 
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
3,960
Reputation
950
Daps
8,302
Reppin
NYC
Yeah, I know. However, I think they've tapped out crude oil reserves.
I don't know if you know, Pennzoil and Quaker State originated in Pennsylvania when they were drilling for oil in that state. This is mega-decades ago. When they refined the oil, just like existing refineries, they extract different fuels. At the time, they didn't know of any use for kerosene.... so they threw it away. :wtf:
Breh, there are vast crude reserves still in the ground here. With constantly improving technology, more and more becomes recoverable every year.

:damn: @ bolded. Still, with the amount that was being produced back then, the waste was probably a drop in the bucket long term. This is just an uneducated guess though.
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
51,421
Reputation
5,293
Daps
115,963
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
:sas2:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/02/22/exxon-mobil-tillerson-ceo-fracking/5726603/

Exxon Mobil CEO: No fracking near my backyard
Chris Woodyard, USA TODAY3:46 p.m. EST February 22, 2014

Exxon Mobil's CEO has joined a lawsuit to stop construction of a water tower near his home that would be used to in the fracking process to drill for oil.

While fracking -- hydraulic fracturing of rock to release pockets of oil -- has raised complaints from environmentalists around the country, Chairman and CEO Rex Tillerson's opposition to a project in his own neighborhood is interesting, given how deeply Exxon Mobil is involved in the process.

Tillerson appeared at a Town Council meeting in Bartonville, Tex., the wealthy enclave near his Dallas home last November to join in the protest over the water tower, The Wall Street Journalreports.

The lawsuit contends the project would create "a noise nuisance and traffic hazards." Trucks would be needed to haul and pump water
.

The tower, being built by Cross Timbers Water Supply, would rise 15 stories, theJournal says. It's adjacent to Tillerson's 83-acre horse ranch and not far from an 18-acre homestead. Tillerson is devoting considerable time to the matter: he sat for three hours in the lawsuit last May and attended an all-day mediation session in September, besides his Town Council appearance.

Among the others opposing the project are those who are not exactly known for environmental crusading: former U.S.House Majority Leader dikk Armey and his wife are the lead plaintiffs.

An Exxon Mobil spokesman contacted by the Journal said that the suit is Tillerson's own matter and the oil giant "has no involvement in the legal matter."

:sas1:
 

Domingo Halliburton

Handmade in USA
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
12,616
Reputation
1,370
Daps
15,451
Reppin
Brooklyn Without Limits
Plus fracking is used to get natural gas, not crude oil.

A lot of well water problems in Pennsylvania. A lot of people are caking by allowing drilling in their property, but there are others who depend on well-water who are screwed.

it's like a 100 cases of reported pollution over a 5 year period in PA. I haven't noticed it at all when I'm in the state but I'm usually either in Philly or Harrisburg.

I have an uncle who lives in the middle of nowhere in the north of the state. You can definitely see how fracking has changed things but they've always had drilling right in people's backyards.

However there is no need to rush into things and damage the environment. The oil and gas will still be there.
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-220
Daps
65,126
Reppin
NULL
People want the US to stop meddling into the affairs of countries in the Middle East but they also want to be able to drive their cars everywhere. Growth in fracking is just an intermediate step in the path towards energy independence.

You sound like right wing radio announcer. It's false in every way.
 
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
3,960
Reputation
950
Daps
8,302
Reppin
NYC
You sound like right wing radio announcer. It's false in every way.
The general populace doesn't want more war in the Middle East?

Americans don't heavily rely on cars for transportation?

America isn't on a path towards energy independence?

Worst poster on this site by far.
 
Top