This is such a dumb question that it's actually smart

NotAnFBIagent

[redacted]
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
34,022
Reputation
5,610
Daps
148,206
some of these mutations being advantageous forged on due to natural selection....this process was supposedly expedited bythe evolution of sexual contact and sexual selection.
Are u asking why non living non reproducing objects don't evolve :dwillhuh:
 

It is a mystery

Tory Lanez Stan
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Messages
8,832
Reputation
3,577
Daps
43,356
The forces of nature don't need to survive. They cant die. They have no evolutionary need.
There isnt some rain with the best chance of survival. Its just rain

Mountains that were formed like shyt will turn to rubble and rocks form with erosion over hundreds of years. That's the closest you will get
 
  • Dap
Reactions: Sly

MalickSyXShabbaz

FREEALLTHEDOVESANDBANANAS
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
3,127
Reputation
-305
Daps
4,601
The forces of nature don't need to survive. They cant die. They have no evolutionary need.
There isnt some rain with the best chance of survival. Its just rain

Mountains that were formed like shyt will turn to rubble and rocks form with erosion over hundreds of years. That's the closest you will get
Well why not
Rain is just a chemical process like the earliest amino acids
I there's no reason for there to not be purple rain If chemical processes evolve
 

DIMES

Retired troll
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Messages
8,389
Reputation
-2,215
Daps
15,048
Reppin
baby, that was the old me
Conventional evolutionary logic tells us that life began as the result of proto enzymes which created basic life forms (like rna and dna) That eventually replicated...through this process of replication, mutations began to appear...some of these mutations being advantageous forged on due to natural selection....this process was supposedly expedited bythe evolution of sexual contact and sexual selection...so per evolutionary occultism this process eventually led to the multitude of traits variations and creatures that we have today


I think this is a Load of horseshyt


But assuming it's true. ..why is that just one chemical process led to "evolution" so to speak...why is it that the other chemical and physical processes that dictate existence never "evolved" and passed on their advantageous traits

Why does rain still rain?
Why do mountains still mountains?
When is gravity gonna evolve to become conscious of a bunch of cac daredevils and kill them more efficiently ?

Think about it my g

@Take It In Blood @Mowgli @Karbaash @String Bell @Rose Gold

Brother, any evolution based theory is a clear falsehood.

And every single one has been disproven & disected.




Some people will never ever believe
 
Joined
Jan 20, 2018
Messages
500
Reputation
-41
Daps
1,867
My problem with evolution is humans’ hubristic view of it. Just because we have a way of defining what life is (that is, what makes us “alive”) doesn’t mean thats just what life (i.e. something that can evolve) is. And this aint just an issue of semantics. If evolution is real, what are the chances that only things with our base of existence are effected?
:jbhmm: Why don’t things like rocks and rain (e.g. poster above mentioned having purple rain perhaps) evolve and adapt?

Its the same reason why we only look for life on planets that can possibly sustain organisms with our base of life. Why can’t there be organisms that “live” off other elements (possibly unknown ones)?
:patrice:
 

MalickSyXShabbaz

FREEALLTHEDOVESANDBANANAS
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
3,127
Reputation
-305
Daps
4,601
My problem with evolution is humans’ hubristic view of it. Just because we have a way of defining what life is (that is, what makes us “alive”) doesn’t mean thats just what life (i.e. something that can evolve) is. And this aint just an issue of semantics. If evolution is real, what are the chances that only things with our base of existence are effected?
:jbhmm: Why don’t things like rocks and rain (e.g. poster above mentioned having purple rain perhaps) evolve and adapt?

Its the same reason why we only look for life on planets that can possibly sustain organisms with our base of life. Why can’t there be organisms that “live” off other elements (possibly unknown ones)?
:patrice:
Great post
 

MalickSyXShabbaz

FREEALLTHEDOVESANDBANANAS
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
3,127
Reputation
-305
Daps
4,601
They actually do say rocks evolve too.

Problem with the theory of evolution is it violates the second law of thermodynamics that they came up with:francis:
Not to mention the big bang theory violates the first:francis:

"The second law of thermodynamics is one of the most fundamental laws of nature, having profound implications. In essence, it says this:

The second law - The level of disorder in the universe is steadily increasing. Systems tend to move from ordered behavior to more random behavior"
facts
 
Top