This is the funniest video coming out of that Charlie Kirk shyt. Hilarious.

[Amerikan Melanin]

When he screamed into his elbow. I want this on a loop.

 

[Ish Gibor]

They apprehended the guy, after he confessed to his father. The father turned him in.

22 Tyler Robinson.

The suspect in Charlie Kirk's assassination has been identified as Tyler Robinson, a 22-year-old Utah resident.

Robinson was named Friday as the alleged assassin of Kirk, a 31-year-old conservative influencer and ally of Donald Trump who was shot and killed during a rally at Utah Valley University on Wednesday.

Trump announced the arrest in an appearance on Fox News, where he said that 'someone very close' to the suspect turned him in.

Sources told CNN that the killer confessed to his father, who worked at the Washington County Sheriff's Department, reports say. His father then contacted authorities and secured his son before he could be taken into custody.

The New York Times reported that the suspect was taken into custody around 11pm local time in southern Utah on Thursday night. The alleged shooter lived in a $600,000 six-bedroom home in Washington, Utah - around 260 miles south of where the carnage unfolded in Orem.

Little is known of Robinson at this time, and officials have not yet released a motive to the shooting.

Authorities said at a press conference on Thursday night that Robinson will face the death penalty if convicted of the assassination.

Investigators previously revealed that ammunition found in a weapon discovered near to the scene had been engraved with transgender and antifascist ideology.

Robinson's arrest comes after a manhunt for the suspect stretched to over a day and a half, with officials previously offering a reward of $100,000 for information leading to his capture.

Surveillance footage had been released showing a figure on top of a roof leaping from a building and sprinting into a nearby neighborhood after Kirk was shot from around 200 yards away.

The alleged killer was found after multiple suspects were incorrectly apprehended on Tuesday.

Initially, a 'person of interest' was said to be in custody in connection with Kirk's shooting, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox announced Wednesday evening.

However, they were later released, FBI Director Kash Patel confirmed.

'The subject in custody has been released after an interrogation by law enforcement,' Patel said in a statement. 'Our investigation continues and we will continue to release information in interest of transparency.'

The conservative commentator was hit by a single bullet while speaking to a crowd at the public university in Orem on Wednesday afternoon.

The father-of-two, known for his fierce MAGA views and thrilling debates with college kids across the country, collapsed immediately after being hit by the gunfire

• Donald Trump says authorities have found Charlie Kirk's killer, telling Fox News: "With a high degree of certainty, we have him in custody"
• He says "somebody very close to him turned him in" - he says he expects officials to give an update later today
• Trump says the suspect's father was involved in taking him to police: "The father convinced the son," he says
• Trump also says the suspect is "28 or 29" - authorities previously said the suspect "appears to be college age"
• Earlier, Kirk's widow Erika was comfortedby US Vice-President JD Vance's wife Usha on the steps of Air Force Two as Kirk's coffin was flown to Arizona

Charlie Kirk's widow gives tearful address after shooting: 'I will never let your legacy die'

Erika Kirk thanks first responders and President Donald Trump for his support, after her husband's death.

www.bbc.com

This Kash Patel guy is just babbling, acting as if law enforcement / the FBI did an awesome job and caught him. That’s not the case. The guy himself admitted to the assassination and family members turned him in (betrayed him).

 

[Ish Gibor]

“declares war”

Is it me…? To me the guy sounds like he has a British accent.

Or is there a state somewhere in the USA where they speak with this accent?

 

[BlackMajik]

This fake ass performance is hilarious lol

 

[Ish Gibor]

Guy comes from a MAGA family, he has a MAGA background. They are native Utahians and residents of Utah.

 

[Doctor Doom]

Me and my pops been laughing at this video all damn day

 

[Ish Gibor]

Tabitha goes deeper into the Groyper cult.




What has been going on in the GOP within recent time.

Prompt, Recent brawls within the Republican Party:

Here’s a more detailed breakdown of recent conflicts within the Republican Party — ideological, policy, personality clashes — showing how the fault lines are emerging. Happy to dig into a specific state or subgroup if you prefer.

Major Internal GOP Conflicts, 2025

Conflict	What It’s About	Key Players	Why It Matters
Rand Paul vs. Vice President J.D. Vance	Clash over use of military force / due process. Vance praised a strike that sank a Venezuelan boat (alleged drug smugglers), saying it was “the highest and best use of the military.” Paul criticized it as reckless, arguing that killing people without trial is dangerous.	Rand Paul; JD Vance; broader divide between libertarian‐leaning GOP vs hawkish, militaristic streaks.	Raises questions about how far the “pro‐military” or “tough on crime/drugs” rhetoric goes in practice. Also pits civil libertarian values vs populist “law & order” impulses. Could affect future GOP foreign/military policy posture.
Foreign Policy / “America First” vs Traditional Hawks	Disagreements over aid to Ukraine, involvement in Middle East, Iran, U.S. obligations abroad. Some in GOP want a more isolationist or transactional foreign policy; others want continued global engagement (alliances, commitments). For instance, a hearing of nominee Elbridge Colby exposed tensions on resource allocation between Europe/Middle East vs China. Also debate over supporting Israel vs when/if to strike Iran.	Trump‐aligned MAGA figures; VP Vance; “traditional” GOP foreign policy hawks (e.g. some Senators, defense establishment); non-interventionist conservatives.	Indicates the party is re‐defining foreign policy norms. This has implications for alliances, military aid, elections, and what “conservatism” means in U.S. foreign policy.
Redistricting Pressure & Primary Threats	Trump allies pushing for redrawing legislative districts mid-decade in states like Indiana and Texas to maximize GOP seats. Those Republicans who resist face threats of primary challenges. Some GOP lawmakers are uncomfortable with shifting maps, pointing to partisan overreach or risk to incumbents.	Donald Trump and his political operation; state GOP leadership (legislators, governors); “Forward America” and other supportive political groups; incumbents who might be harmed.	Shows the intra‐party power dynamics: alignment with Trump’s agenda is being enforced not just by rhetoric, but via electoral threats. Could lead to more loyalty tests, or fracturing, especially among “establishment” or moderate Republicans.
Freedom Caucus / Procedural vs Leadership Tensions	Disagreements over rules, proxy voting, procedural mechanisms, and what counts as acceptable compromise. E.g., conflict around allowing absent members (new parents) to vote by proxy; some members viewed certain procedural votes as betrayals. One recent example: Anna Paulina Luna resigned from Freedom Caucus after disputes.	Freedom Caucus hardliners; House GOP leadership; moderate or less ideological GOP members.	Highlights that even within conservative factions there are limits; disagreements over how rigid or flexible the operational rules should be. Also matters because procedural rules impact legislative output and who gets rewarded or punished.
Culture/Rhetoric After Charlie Kirk’s Death / Political Violence	The killing of Charlie Kirk has triggered strong rhetoric from GOP leaders. Some calls for calm and de-escalation; others pushing combative language and attributing blame to “the radical left.” This has exacerbated disagreements about tone, strategy, electoral risk.	Republican governors; national GOP figures; conservative media; grassroots activists vs more moderate or cautious members.	Reflects the tension between mobilizing base emotions (which often elevates division) vs keeping broader appeal and avoiding backlash. Also could impact internal cohesion if leaders differ strongly in how to respond to violence or extreme events.

Emerging Trends & Themes

• MAGA vs “Traditional” GOP: Many of the conflicts can be seen as a tug of war between the MAGA / America First wing (more populist, sometimes more aggressive or unilateral in rhetoric or policy) and more “establishment” or traditional conservative wings (more internationalist, more cautious about legal norms or institutions).
• Enforcing Loyalty via Primaries or Threats: Not just disagreements in private — there are concrete threats (redistricting, primary challenges) holding GOP members accountable for not toeing certain lines. This increases pressure on moderate members.
• Policy (Foreign, Crime, Voting) as Dividing Lines: Issues like foreign policy, voting rights and election laws, law & order/criminal justice tend to generate the sharpest divisions. These are not just policy debates but identity and strategy debates: what direction the party wants to take.
• Procedural/Institutional Disputes matter: It’s not always what laws to pass, but how. Rules about proxy voting, how discipline within the caucus works, how leadership is chosen — these are often overlooked but they shape which faction has effective control.

If you like, I can map these conflicts by state, or chart how they might play out in the 2026 midterms. Do you want to go that route?

 

[Ish Gibor]

If you like, I can map these conflicts by state, or chart how they might play out in the 2026 midterms. Do you want to go that route?

“Here are some state-level flashpoints in the GOP in 2025 / leading into 2026, showing how internal conflicts are playing out, and what the implications might be. If you want, I can map them geographically or by which faction is winning/losing.

State-Level Conflicts & Battles

State	Issue	Who’s Clashing	Stakes / Why It Matters
Texas	Mid-decade redistricting pushed by Republican legislature (with pressure from Trump) to redraw congressional districts in a way that favors the GOP in 2026.	GOP state legislature, GOP leadership vs Democratic lawmakers; also some concern among Republicans about incumbents being hurt by map changes.	If successful, the GOP could pick up multiple U.S. House seats. But it also risks blowback (legal challenges, public backlash), internal dissent from Republicans uneasy with overly aggressive maps. Incumbent safety, intra-GOP pressure, impact on minority representation are at issue.
Missouri	Special legislative session to redraw congressional maps; a GOP map is moving forward that would reconfigure Democratic districts (notably in Kansas City) to favor Republicans.	GOP leadership in the state legislature including the Governor, with some Republicans opposing on procedural or precedent grounds, vs Democrats and civil rights groups opposing on fairness and representation grounds.	If enacted, it shifts the balance toward the GOP in U.S. House seats. Also raises intra-GOP questions about mid-decade redistricting (viability, legal risk) and how far state GOPs can go. Potential precedent for other states.
Virginia	Dispute in the 5th District between local GOP leaders and the state party over “loyalty tests” for candidates — i.e. whether GOP candidates must meet certain criteria of alignment or orthodoxy.	Conservative wing (or more ideologically pure GOP members) pushing loyalty expectations vs more moderate or local GOP figures who may resist. The state party leadership is trying to enforce stricter alignment.	These “tests” of loyalty can produce primary challenges, reduce unity, alienate local GOP actors, but they may also help the faction enforcing the tests in consolidating control. This is especially relevant in swing districts.
Oregon	Representative Cyrus Javadi switched from Republican to Democrat, citing that the GOP is now more focused on obstruction than doing governance, especially around cultural issues (drag, LGBTQ+ issues, free speech/book bans).	Javadi vs GOP leadership / base; also reflects tensions between cultural conservatives and more moderate Republicans (or Republicans whose personal values conflict with some of the culture-war policy pushes).	While one defection may not shift large numbers, it signals potential for losses in marginal seats where cultural issues dominate. Also hurts GOP’s narrative of unity; may encourage more defections or push moderates to be more vocal or independent.
Florida	A proxy war between Trump and Governor Ron DeSantis over who controls influential state party posts / appointments. E.g. the CFO role: DeSantis appointed one of his loyalists, but Trump had backed a different Republican, leading to tensions.	DeSantis vs Trump-aligned GOP figures; competing influence over state level party machinery.	Control of state party apparatus matters for candidate recruitment, messaging, endorsements. These appointments can signal which faction (MAGA, establishment, etc.) has ascendancy in future primaries. Could also diminish cooperation between wings of the party.

Implications for the Midterms & Beyond

• Primary Challenges & Loyalty Tests: More Republicans are being judged less by electability and more by ideological purity or alignment with Trump / MAGA positions. This may push some moderates out or force them to adopt more hard-line stances.
• Redistricting as Strategy & Risk: Aggressive redistricting is a tool to gain legislative and congressional seats, but it carries significant legal and reputational risk. Also, for some GOP incumbents, new maps may threaten their own seats, especially in places where districts are being redrawn in aggressive ways.
• Defections & Public Signaling: Defections like that of Javadi in Oregon serve as both warnings and signals. If more occur, it could alter marginal races in 2026, and make GOP unity harder to sustain in some states.
• Factional Power Struggles: Battles like Trump vs DeSantis over appointments indicate that state party infrastructure control is a key front. Whoever controls these levers has major influence in the party’s future direction.
• Legal / Electoral Fairness Pressure: As redistricting maps more aggressively favoring Republicans pass or are pushed, legal challenges mount. Civil rights groups, sometimes internal GOP critics, may oppose on grounds of fairness or impacts on minority representation. Vote suppression concerns get more attention.

If you like, I can pull together a map showing where GOP internal divisions are strongest (by state), or a list of which incumbents are most vulnerable to primary or intra-party challenges. What would be more useful?

 

[Ish Gibor]

Prompt:

“Groyper” has a few layers of meaning, depending on context:

1. Origin – Meme/Frog Character
   • It started as a variation of Pepe the Frog, with a chubbier body and smug, folded-hands pose.
   • People on message boards like ***** and Twitter used “groyper” as a meme character — usually to show a more sarcastic, scheming, or self-satisfied version of Pepe.
2. 
   
3. Political Usage
   • In the late 2010s, U.S. far-right activists, particularly followers of Nick Fuentes, adopted the “groyper” image and called themselves the “Groyper Army.”
   • In this sense, a “groyper” is a supporter of white nationalist or extreme conservative politics, often focused on opposing mainstream conservatives whom they see as too moderate.
4. 
   
5. Broader Internet Slang
   • Outside of politics, sometimes “groyper” is just shorthand for that meme frog image or style, not necessarily tied to ideology.

So: a groyper can mean simply a smug Pepe-style meme character, or it can mean someone aligned with Fuentes’ far-right movement, depending on context.

Do you want me to break down its political role (like the “Groyper Wars” against mainstream conservatives), or just the meme history?

 

[Ish Gibor]

Do you want me to break down its political role (like the “Groyper Wars” against mainstream conservatives), or just the meme history?


Got it — let’s go a bit deeper into both meme history and political role of “groyper.”

Meme History

• 2015–2016: Pepe the Frog is everywhere online. People begin making variations — one of them is the “groyper,” a plump frog leaning on folded hands with a smug face.
• Groypers get used in forums and meme culture as a way to show someone being sneaky, sarcastic, or “smugly waiting.”
• At this stage, the meaning is just funny internet frog art.

Political Role (“Groyper Army”)

• 2018–2019: Nick Fuentes, a far-right activist, and his followers start using the groyper as their symbol.
• They call themselves the “Groyper Army.”
• Their main target: mainstream conservatives like Charlie Kirk (Turning Point USA), Dan Crenshaw, and Ben Shapiro — whom they see as “too moderate,” too supportive of Israel, or too tolerant of immigration and LGBTQ rights.

The Groyper Wars (2019)

• Groypers attended events hosted by mainstream conservatives and asked hostile, loaded questions.
• Their goal was to embarrass speakers and push far-right talking points (e.g., restricting immigration, rejecting foreign wars, opposing diversity initiatives).
• This got them attention — and the groyper frog became a symbol of the ultra-right youth faction within U.S. politics.

Summary of Meanings

• Neutral meme: Smug, folded-hand Pepe variant used for jokes.
• Political movement: Nick Fuentes’ far-right followers, often anti-immigration, anti-LGBTQ, and hostile to mainstream conservative figures.

Do you want me to also show you how groypers differ from other far-right meme groups (like “alt-right,” “America First,” or “incels”), so you see where they fit in?

 

[Ish Gibor]

The FBI under Kash Palet the podcaster, claims “TRN means trans”.

ChatGPT explains the following.

Prompt, What does TRN mean to incels and Groypers:


Good question — TRN shows up in both incel and groyper/AF spaces, but with a slightly different spin.

Among

Incels

• TRN = “The Real nikka” (slang from Black incel/“blackpill” spaces).
• It refers to a guy who is hyper-dominant, often aggressive, sexually successful, and doesn’t play by social rules.
• Basically, TRN is like an extreme version of “Chad” (the archetypal attractive, desired male).
• It’s often used bitterly or sarcastically: “Women only want TRNs.”
• In short: TRN = alpha archetype, feared and envied.

Among

Groypers / America First

• TRN is sometimes borrowed ironically from incel/***** culture.
• Used in jokes/memes to mock mainstream conservatives or liberals, often with racial undertones.
• In groyper culture, it’s less about sexual hierarchy (like incels) and more about being “authentic” or “based,” in contrast to “cucked” conservatives.
• But — it’s also sometimes used as a racial slur or dogwhistle in groyper circles, depending on context.

Key Difference

Group	TRN meaning	Tone of use
Incels	Archetypal alpha male (like Chad), sexually dominant, feared competitor	Bitter / envious
Groypers	Borrowed slang, used ironically or racially, to mark someone as “real” (vs. fake/cucked)	Mocking / edgy

So in short: Incels = TRN as sexual hierarchy concept. Groypers = TRN as ironic meme / sometimes racial code.


Do you want me to also show how TRN fits into the “Chad vs Virgin” and “Based vs Cuck” dichotomies across these subcultures?

Prompt, What does this mean?:

Let me break it down more simply.

1. Incels (dating/sex focus)

• They rank men by how much success they have with women.
• “Chad” = the good-looking guy all women want.
• “TRN” = a slang term for a guy who is even more dominant than Chad, often imagined as aggressive, hyper-masculine, and sexually successful.
• When incels say “women only want TRNs,” they mean: “normal guys like me never have a chance; only the most dominant men get women.”

2. Groypers (political meme culture)

• They aren’t focused on dating, but they borrow slang from incels and *****.
• TRN here is often used sarcastically or as a joke to label someone who is “real,” “authentic,” or unapologetic — in contrast to “cucked” conservatives (seen as weak or fake).
• Sometimes it also carries racial undertones in groyper memes, since the original phrase came from Black internet slang.

So:

• For incels, TRN = the ultimate “alpha male rival” in dating.
• For groypers, TRN = a meme word for being “real” (sometimes racial, sometimes just ironic).

Would you like me to draw a diagram that shows how “Chad,” “Virgin,” and “TRN” fit into the incel worldview — and how groypers adapted those terms into their own “based vs. cuck” politics?