mastermind
Rest In Power Kobe
Its not the app, its the bullshyt they tryna put in the law that impinges on our rights.
And these congress do not care about the dangers of social media.
TikTok USA Thread - Right Wing Billionaires Buying Controlling Stake At $14 Billion Valuation
And these congress do not care about the dangers of social media.
what constitutes mindless bullshyt that requires congressional intervention?
tiktok claim to fame is their algorithm that shows users content they want to see.
protip: if you don't look for "mindless bullshyt", you won't find "mindless bullshyt".
most ppl dont know about the extra bullshyt that politicians try to add into each bill. i get protesting that, but folks have literally called it the TikTok ban and ran up Chew's socials like he's a national hero. he's a well-trained spokesperson for another PoS company
edit: y'all need to read this shyt because i guarantee over 90% of folks do not understand it.
RESTRICT Act Final Text
www.documentcloud.org
Last edited:
fukk this restrict act. As usual, government takes a chainsaw to a problem that requires a scalpel. Unprecedented federal power grab. This could definitely ban foreign VPNs, crypto exchanges, porn sites, etc.
Shutup, nxgga.
What are you doing?
IIVI
Superstar
Edit: someone already posted it.
That's BS. Sneaky ass government smh.
Yet, not a SINGLE uproar about UBI and the damage A.I is currently doing to the job market that is being threatened for the future?
That's BS. Sneaky ass government smh.
Yet, not a SINGLE uproar about UBI and the damage A.I is currently doing to the job market that is being threatened for the future?
Last edited:
from adversaries according to the bill itself.
The language is far too broad.
Also, "foreign adversaries" are whoever the government says they are.
Last edited:
just say you're unfamiliar with how the DoD and DoS determine that. they even put specific countries in the bill.
you can't just wake up and say a country is an adversary.... it would be broad of they did any entity. which from what i read it doesn't
Trust the DoD, brehsThis is supposed to be ablut TikTok. That company is not mentioned once in the bill. Giving government this much broad authority over the internet is unwise.
Could the RESTRICT Act Criminalize the Use of VPNs?
The act is insanely far-reaching and could have a huge range of deleterious effects, even if it doesn't criminalize people using a VPN to access TikTok.
reason.com
Even fascist ass Josh Hawleys bill actually targets TikTok.
no shyt the bill targets tiktok. it's chinese, what is China to us
This is supposed to be ablut TikTok. That company is not mentioned once in the bill. Giving government this much broad authority over the internet is unwise.
Could the RESTRICT Act Criminalize the Use of VPNs?
The act is insanely far-reaching and could have a huge range of deleterious effects, even if it doesn't criminalize people using a VPN to access TikTok.
Even fascist ass Josh Hawleys bill actually targets TikTok.
you proving you dont know what you're reading
no shyt the bill targets tiktok. it's chinese, what is China to us
Hawleys bill targets TikTok by name, unlike the Restrict Act. People want to reign in TikTok, not give the federal government broad power to regulate foreign tech. That's the point. Just like we wanted to fight Al Qaeda and OBL, not give the government unlimited war and surveillance powers. I don't see what's so hard to understand.i dont see how u cant understand that RESTRICT doesn't give them broad control ovr everything. y'all don't read this shyt.
the patriot act didnt give them unlimited surveillance powers either. LMFAO.
Last edited: