Time to Revisit a Classic: Harvard Educated MIT Professor Proves Kobe>>>MJ

Chris Broussard

Fox Sports NBA Sportswriter
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
265
Reputation
160
Daps
2,321
ive gone even deeper into the analysis, and from what my sources are telling me, Kobe Bryant has made every single shot hes taken after you disregard the shots that he missed
 

RugbyMan

Pro
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
678
Reputation
61
Daps
1,137
Reppin
NULL

i mean, we all learned how to comprehend right?

besides, this isn't truly stanning... this is all the shyt statistics are truly made up of.

this ASQ rating in a sense, would shyt on all players who didn't play in the 90's and beyond, cause of an abundance of slow,short white dudes in the league.

but in all reality, fukk them old nikkas.. Kobes 81>>>>>Wilts 100

:what: So you're the type of cat that just likes to argue huh?
Dude was selective with what variables he chose. He couldn've factored in the more physical nature of the game back then, and also the fact that teams now employ zone defenses at certain times. Or the fact that the MJ era had an overall more highly skilled front court, etc. But he chose specific variables to suit his agenda, which makes this all complete :duck:
 

MegaTronBomb!

Power is in my hair nikka
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
14,194
Reputation
2,515
Daps
44,124
Reppin
From The Westside With Love
:what: So you're the type of cat that just likes to argue huh?
Dude was selective with what variables he chose. He couldn've factored in the more physical nature of the game back then, and also the fact that teams now employ zone defenses at certain times. Or the fact that the MJ era had an overall more highly skilled front court, etc. But he chose specific variables to suit his agenda, which makes this all complete :duck:

how exactly would you even gauge physicality?

c'mon now.
 

RugbyMan

Pro
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
678
Reputation
61
Daps
1,137
Reppin
NULL
how exactly would you even gauge physicality?

c'mon now.

:wtf:Do you understand the difference between how fouls were called back then compared to this soft shyt now? The game was inarguably more physical back then. You're just trolling now. I'm done.
 

MegaTronBomb!

Power is in my hair nikka
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
14,194
Reputation
2,515
Daps
44,124
Reppin
From The Westside With Love
:wtf:Do you understand the difference between how fouls were called back then compared to this soft shyt now? The game was inarguably more physical back then. You're just trolling now. I'm done.

nikka it aint trolling...

we talking bout stats :aicmon:

you can't even come up with any type of feasible way to measure a statistic of physical play.

can you?
 

threattonature

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,764
Reputation
4,042
Daps
79,956
late 80s/Early 90s Pistons defense >>>>

Current NBA defense>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Just about every other team's defense back then.

And yeah stats only go so far and there are a lot of variables that come into account. There's a reason that a lot of players best statistical season's don't come in there team's best seasons.

So I can't cosign that study at all.
 

YouLoveMe

Banned
Joined
Dec 31, 2012
Messages
5,494
Reputation
-125
Daps
3,716
Reppin
Miami
attachment.php
 
Top