
even tho im copping for the co op that is pathetic![]()

Pathetic? I prefer smaller player count mp games. Not to mention map design, match flow and balance is what makes a game good, not sheer size. planetside 2 has 2000 player skirmishes and that junk is a pile of crap. Everything doesn't need to be battlefield.even tho im copping for the co op that is pathetic![]()
Yup. I always liked team slayer over big team battle. I wouldn't mind a 32 or 64 player match type in halo just for mayhemThe greatest mutiplayer game ever was 4v4 lets see how it plays...looking forward to it.![]()
.I think it can make for more personal matches with less players. Instead of just trying to rack up kills, you want to kill certain people, which I think can make for a good time, I hope they dont mess this game up.Pathetic? I prefer smaller player count mp games. Not to mention map design, match flow and balance is what makes a game good, not sheer size. planetside 2 has 2000 player skirmishes and that junk is a pile of crap. Everything doesn't need to be battlefield.

The greatest mutiplayer game ever was 4v4 lets see how it plays...looking forward to it.![]()
yea pathetic was a bit too harsh but im not feeling 6v6 being the maxPathetic? I prefer smaller player count mp games. Not to mention map design, match flow and balance is what makes a game good, not sheer size. planetside 2 has 2000 player skirmishes and that junk is a pile of crap. Everything doesn't need to be battlefield.
i probably wont play that much multiplayer anyway so it really wont matter
Naw Gears of war 1 is the GOAThuh? You could have 16 vs 16 in unreal tournament 99

There is no single player, but it is 6 v 6 plus AI running around, so we dont know how many people we will be able to shoot at yetyea pathetic was a bit too harsh but im not feeling 6v6 being the max
8v8 is the sweet spot for me and i always feel like its not enough people when its less than that
i probably wont play that much multiplayer anyway so it really wont matter