Breh. Literally nobody who has played both of those games extensively will come out and say the UC2 experience on the OG Xbawks was better. You know you aint play UT mane. You sayin that bullshyt wit like 8 player MP was better? AIIIIIIIITE WHATEVER YOU SAY BREH
I've played both, and I'll stand by @Raiders saying I had more fun on the Xbox with UC2. It had a nice spot for people who enjoyed the 3rd person view of things. I even liked Quake 3 on Dreamcast when it had 3rd person. UT99 is dope but then again I'm not considering UC2/UT99 comparable. They're both completely different playing fields to be compared to each other. Not everyone was born on PC.
Even at that the games are played differently, UT99 is literally grounded compared to UC2.I'll say the my only gripe with UC2 is melee for the fakkit casual crowd. Game could have been done without that. Also UC2 was just better optimized for console compared to a UT99 port. UT99 just wouldn't work to it's full benefit-another reason why they shouldn't be compared. UC1 just felt awkward on Xbox because of the limited controls, could you imagine trying to play UT99 like that?
GoW 1 was dope despite the lag and clunky gameplay. They kept it simple which a lot of games don't do anymore. It's funny because epic didn't even try with the GoW 1 multiplayer.
Why are we even trying to have a legit comparison between those 2 games?
, they don't fit in the same category with each other.
Last edited:


.

I cant believe you just said that 