lol at 90% of responses being the 0.08% of the population that is 6'6" or taller and half of those are extraordinary athletes on top of that. Shows how many people can't evaluate basketball for shyt. Less than 1 in 1000 men are over 6'6", and probably less than 1 in 10,000 men are over 6'6" and transcendent athletes besides, but we're supposed to believe that the most skilled bball players ever just happen to be in that tiny 1 in 10,000 pool of athletic tall guys and not somewhere in the 99.99% of other guys?
MJ said his own brother was better than him but just never grew tall enough. MJ is one of the greatest athletes in NBA history and that turbo'd all his other skills but none of those skills by themselves were next level - without the size and athleticism neither MJ's shooting, nor his ballhandling, nor his passing, nor his defensive technique are next-level. 6'9" Magic getting named despite not being a notable shooter, ballhandler, or defender. Hakeem getting named because he has good footwork and touch for his SIZE, but when Hakeem came into the league he was known as raw as fukk with remarkable agility for a center but not a fraction of the skill that a lot of smaller, less athletic players needed to make the league.
For every 6'6" transcendent athlete with skill, there are 100 other guys under 6' who were just as skilled but didn't have the height or the athleticism to make it.
Players like CP3, Steph, and Kyrie are far more skilled than Kobe, MJ, and LeBron. Duncan or Hakeem don't remotely belong in the discussion. Having a height advantage or having supreme athleticism is not a skill. 6'2" Steph is a back-to-back MVP, whereas a 6'2" MJ with Steph's hops wouldn't even be an all-star. 6'0" CP3 is a first-ballot hall of famer. 6'0" Kobe is maybe a starter, maybe not. 6'2" Kyrie makes All-NBA teams. 6'2" LeBron with Kyrie's speed/vertical is carving out a career as a pass-first PG on an ensemble cast.