Save the effort. They do not care. LolDeductive reasoning.
Me: getting shot in the foot usually breaks said foot, leaves a big ass hole, might take off a toe or two. You won't be walking on it.
You: The doctor said she got shot!
Im not saying she didn't get shot AT, but no she didn't get shot.
What you said is pure nonsense
Deductive reasoning.
Me: getting shot in the foot usually breaks said foot, leaves a big ass hole, might take off a toe or two. You won't be walking on it.
You: The doctor said she got shot!
Im not saying she didn't get shot AT, but no she didn't get shot.
2 separate appeals have been filed for awhile now. Been stated all this is only being pushed in public because he almost died.
Now this fakkit thinks his imaginary boot camp experience is equal to being shot.nikka I ran an entire mile and a half on a broken right foot because there was no chance I was staying in Navy Boot Camp another 8 weeks. The fukk are you talking about?
You can’t make this up
Yes. The bodyguard statement is new to you, just like this evidence is. It was filed in his appeal last year.
Why would we care? Yall argument makes zero sense
Why is jadakiss as hard as it gets, why Megan had to lie about smacking that bytchWhy would we care? If tory doesn't pull the trigger to shoot the bullets, Megan doesn't get hit by the bullet fragments. How is that not getting shot?
The question is, why does this distinction matter so much to you?
Bro are u retarded? Did u not read what I wrote?What you said is pure nonsense
So if someone fires a gun with a switch and the bullet richochets and kills a random kid, the kid didn't get shot, right? Cause they weren't "shot directly"
Everything matters. U don't think it matters if I wasn't actually trying to shoot u and from being stupid a fragment from what I actually shot hit u or if I shot u directly? nikka do u understand the difference of damage and even shyt like intent? All of that matters in court. Both are crimes. But it's like if I snap and murder u on the spot out of rage versus planning ahead and murdering u. Those are 2 completely different murder charges. And yes. If someone shoots u directly it's a big difference from being grazed or hit with debris.The question is, why does this distinction matter so much to you?
Do you think the jury decided’s he’s innocent if they knew the bullet hit the ground first?
Do you think it’s any way possible for meg or kelsey or the doctor to know definitively if the gullet hit the ground first or not?
Why are you doing this???
