His charges had nothing to do with intent.Everything matters. U don't think it matters if I wasn't actually trying to shoot u and from being stupid a fragment from what I actually shot hit u or if I shot u directly? nikka do u understand the difference of damage and even shyt like intent?
Maybe he could have gotten a more lenient sentence, but he was too cowardly to admit he made a mistake.
Hell, he coulda avoided all this if he just admitted to his mistake in the first place.
assault with a semiautomatic firearm; having a loaded, unregistered firearm in a vehicle; and discharging a firearm with gross negligence.All of that matters in court. Both are crimes. But it's like if I snap and murder u on the spot out of rage versus planning ahead and murdering u. Those are 2 completely different murder charges. And yes. If someone shoots u directly it's a big difference from being grazed or hit with debris.
None of this has anything to do with intent.
I thought you said your mom was a lawyer
