Toyota Becoming More Efficient Replacing Robots With Friends, Friend

Mr. Somebody

Friend Of A Friend
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
28,262
Reputation
2,017
Daps
43,625
Reppin
Los Angeles
Toyota is becoming more efficient by replacing robots with humans
By Max Nisen @MaxNisen April 7, 2014
rtr27a4q.jpg

Let's get a guy with a hammer instead. Reuters/Mick Tsikas

Car makers have embraced automation and replaced humans with robots for years. But Toyota is deliberately taking a step backward and replacing automated machines in some factories in Japan and creating heavily manual production lines staffed with humans, according to Bloomberg.

+


It’s an unconventional choice for a Japanese company. Japan has by far the most industrial robots of any country, with an estimated 309,400 (pdf p. 17.) Only South Korea has a higher ratio of robots to humans.

+


Toyota’s latest strategy has two main aspects. First, it wants to make sure that workers truly understand the work they’re doing instead of feeding parts into machines and being helpless when one breaks down. Second, it wants to figure out ways to make processes higher quality and more efficient in the long run. The company worries that automation means it has too many average workers and not enough craftsmen and masters.

+


So far, people taking back work done by robots at over 100 workspaces reduced waste in crankshaft production by 10%, and helped shorten the production line. Others improved axel production and cut costs for chassis parts.

+


“We cannot simply depend on the machines that only repeat the same task over and over again,” project lead Mitsuru Kawai told Bloomberg. “To be the master of the machine, you have to have the knowledge and the skills to teach the machine.”

+


Kawai has spent 50 years at Toyota, so was steeped in its management philosophy. The manual lines are a refocus on “Kaizen,” or continuous improvement, and “Monozukuri,” which is essentially the art of making things well. It’s a re-commitment to management ideas behind the decades old Toyota Production System.

+


Machines are great at doing things quickly and at low cost. But people—especially ones with the experience of performing tasks themselves—bring craftsmanship, insight into process design, and consistency of quality. Toyota has found that the race to reduce the human element can end up making processes less efficient.

+


The car maker’s program also follows a philosophy of human capital similar to one outlined by George Mason professor Tyler Cowen, who argues in his book “Average is Over” that the jobs and gains in the economy of the future are going to go to people who can work with and improve smarter and smarter machines.

+


Toyota’s strategy may come at the cost of expansion. While pushing for more deliberate, manual manufacturing, Toyota is not building new factories for three years. It’s still the world’s largest automaker by sales, but Volkswagen is on its heels.

+


automaker-total-annual-sales-toyota-sales-gm-sales-volkswagen-sales_chartbuilder.png
 

Hawaiian Punch

umop-apisdn
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
19,106
Reputation
7,014
Daps
84,001
Reppin
The I in Team
It is an interesting conundrum I must say. Replace humans with machines, but lack enough experienced personnel to fix said machines when they break down. Solution, replace machines with humans, who are independent thinkers that can be replaced by other humans when they break down. :ohhh:

That is until A.I. becomes reality, friend.:demonic:
 

Mr. Somebody

Friend Of A Friend
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
28,262
Reputation
2,017
Daps
43,625
Reppin
Los Angeles
It is an interesting conundrum I must say. Replace humans with machines, but lack enough experienced personnel to fix said machines when they break down. Solution, replace machines with humans, who are independent thinkers that can be replaced by other humans when they break down. :ohhh:

That is until A.I. becomes reality, friend.:demonic:
AI is efficient, not innovative. AI wont be good at Lean, friend.
 

Hawaiian Punch

umop-apisdn
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
19,106
Reputation
7,014
Daps
84,001
Reppin
The I in Team
AI is efficient, not innovative. AI wont be good at Lean, friend.

And the lingering joke in 1899 said the patent office should close because everything has been invented. AI is not good at learning today, friend. Fortunately (or unfortunately) for us there is a tomorrow.
 

tmonster

Superstar
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
17,900
Reputation
3,205
Daps
31,793
It is an interesting conundrum I must say. Replace humans with machines, but lack enough experienced personnel to fix said machines when they break down. Solution, replace machines with humans, who are independent thinkers that can be replaced by other humans when they break down. :ohhh:

That is until A.I. becomes reality, friend.:demonic:

They may/will get so efficient that machines can build replacements machines
That anything can be reproduced faithfully, shared and scaled is the inherent promise and feature of the digital age. This capacity is the holy grail of the scientific enterprise that got us here and existentially, it appears to accomplish the secondary neurotic goal of mankind, to gain control over nature (the primary goal being to know what and why he is).

Computers are better than us at so many things, but in general terms, the most crucial appear to be:
-fidelity in their reproduction as a core design feature,
-the ability for instant programming
-and the power nearly flawless execution of said programming.

By comparison, it takes a human many years for equivalent task programing and humanness itself is defined by the character feature of error riddled execution, most fundamentally seen in as a feature of our reproductive function or our bios instructions, DNA. Evolution accidented human intelligence and then humans using this intelligence, in their production/creation processes, made obsolete the selective pressure feature of evolution that accidented said intelligence, we can now simply select which machines will do what (at the least we retain the illusion that we can select well without the beta testing of selective pressure, but human intelligence is flawed with bias. In any case, I reserve this digression for another coversation)

Any iteration of this process leads to humans being replaced
The true solution to all of this is a paradigm shift where labor is divorced from human identity. And this is what we are uniquely good at in this regard, learning and determining our identity.
 

iceberg_is_on_fire

Wearing Lions gear when it wasn't cool
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
23,809
Reputation
5,439
Daps
67,269
Reppin
Lombardi Trophies in Allen Park
I got a job out of high school working for Ford Motor Company, did it for seven years. After 5 years, realized what was going down, went back to school. Ultimately got my MBA. When I worked there, there was over 1500 people that worked there. Now? under 500 with the same numbers being pumped out. My mom and stepdad are still there.
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
786
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
at this point in time machines lack the innovation to make a process better. For the most part a good chunk of these production lines are dated and simply updated with new process patterns. This doesn't provide a lot of room for innovation in production, machines aren't so great at providing constructive feedback, at thsi point in time a human eye and a human mind is often required to spot the often hidden room for improvement.

Ironically enough humans are more cost efficient lol. who knew...
 

DonFrancisco

Your Favorite Tio!
Joined
May 3, 2013
Messages
1,385
Reputation
420
Daps
3,101
Reppin
Sabado Gigante
I'm not surprised, it is hard to have continuous improvement when robots are making the parts. It also goes against the lean principles because you will need a quality inspector (in essence to stop "the line") to inspect the finished product. While it is far easier to have workers along the line find a defect and quickly fix it. Also the line could stop because robots could go off-line causing a bottleneck. Also robots can't make suggestions or have lean 6Sigma type meetings to improve processes.

Lets keep it 100, Toyota realize it was having a lot of defects and using cost-cutting measures like total automation was costing them far more in total recalls and fixing defects for free. They also have to deal with a $1.2 Billion dollar fine that cost them a lot of profit and hurt them a ton in terms of branding. Also they have to consider they have a brand and reputation to protect. I drove a 99 Corolla, that thing survived me driving at 40 mph straight into a ditch with nothing more than a scratched bumper.

I have a Green Belt in Lean 6Sigma, so take my analysis with a grain of salt. Any black belts here?
 

ltheghost

Payin Debts.... N40
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
6,508
Reputation
480
Daps
7,449
Reppin
Japan, but from the 989
I'm not surprised, it is hard to have continuous improvement when robots are making the parts. It also goes against the lean principles because you will need a quality inspector (in essence to stop "the line") to inspect the finished product. While it is far easier to have workers along the line find a defect and quickly fix it. Also the line could stop because robots could go off-line causing a bottleneck. Also robots can't make suggestions or have lean 6Sigma type meetings to improve processes.

Lets keep it 100, Toyota realize it was having a lot of defects and using cost-cutting measures like total automation was costing them far more in total recalls and fixing defects for free. They also have to deal with a $1.2 Billion dollar fine that cost them a lot of profit and hurt them a ton in terms of branding. Also they have to consider they have a brand and reputation to protect. I drove a 99 Corolla, that thing survived me driving at 40 mph straight into a ditch with nothing more than a scratched bumper.

I have a Green Belt in Lean 6Sigma, so take my analysis with a grain of salt. Any black belts here?

I'm not a Green Belt Lean 6Sigma, but I'm working on my Kaizen Black Belt after 3 years of intensive study. As to this point about robots it's coming down to a cost analysts. The machines need to operated by someone or at least maintained and you want to make sure your human workforce is better than your robot one. Robots are great for repeating but horrible at instant corrections they are not programmed for. A human breaks down and we can send them to the hospital or give them a day off. Robots break down and you have to call in a small army to repair them. It's way easier to replace humans than replace big machinery.

But if we can bridge the gap between the two. Instead of one replacing the other you can have both working together to create what I like to call...Cyborg synergy.
 
Last edited:

Vandelay

Life is absurd. Lean into it.
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
27,364
Reputation
8,278
Daps
100,560
Reppin
Phi Chi Connection
Short term gain.

Ideally both compliment each other best.

Even as AI grows more complex, there will need to be human input because AI is providing a service for humans.

Problem is you have a segment that wants to remove human intervention altogether.

Sadly, the latter is going to win out because of the profit motive.
 

Mr. Somebody

Friend Of A Friend
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
28,262
Reputation
2,017
Daps
43,625
Reppin
Los Angeles
I'm not a Green Belt Lean 6Sigma, but I'm working on my Kaizen Black Belt after 3 years of intensive study. As to this point about robots it's coming down to a cost analysts. The machines need to operated by someone or at least maintained and you want to make sure your human workforce is better than your robot one. Robots are great for repeating but horrible at instant corrections they are not programmed for. A human breaks down and we can send them to the hospital or give them a day off. Robots break down and you have to call in a small army to repair them. It's way easier to replace humans than replace big machinery.

But if we can bridge the gap between the two. Instead of one replacing the other you can have both working together to create what I like to call...Cyborg synergy.
You might want to play portal 2 for a glimpse at the future.
 
Top