Trading Places Was Based On The Rothschild Family Taking Over The Bank Of England.

ThrobbingHood

“I’m Sorry for 2025”
Joined
Nov 11, 2017
Messages
34,144
Reputation
17,499
Daps
240,765
So I’m sure most of you have seen this movie and while most of us understood on a surface level what happened at the end, here’s a deeper explanation of the actual ending.



Now here’s a post I saved from another board over ten years ago that shows how the Rothschild family did the exact same thing.






———————————————————-

Great movie.

It's funny how true things are hidden in movies. The concept of how the brothers were tricked is based on how the Rothschild family took over the Bank of England.

Napoleon Bonaparte had vowed to do away with privately owned banks and get France back to controlling it's money supply once he defeated England. The Rothschild family, having banker sons all over Europe, was able to fund the war from both sides, ensuring a profit.

As a result of this, Rothschild messengers were usually allowed past enemy lines to conduct business and relay messages. It was for this reason that Amshel Rothschild, the most powerful banker in England at the time, had knowledge of Wellington's impending victory at Waterloo WELL before all others did. (Napoleon's victory meant English stock was worthless, but Wellington's victory meant business as usual)

When their stock market opened the morning after said victory, Amshel walked to the podium, and with a sad face, began to sell all of his English stocks and properties. This caused a massive sell-off, as stockholders assumed Amshel knew something they all didn't. As stocks hit rock-bottom, Amshel had his operatives buy back all of the stock at pennies on the dollar.

Later that day, news of Wellington's victory brought cheers, until everyone realized that they were broke. Rothschild immediately demanded payment in full of all of his stock options! He now would own every business,small bank, and grainery in England.

When the King was forced to step in and make a deal by writing out promissory notes to cover the countries' losses, Amshel made the king a deal: allow him ownership of the Bank of England, and the right to print all of the nation's currency, or pay up NOW.

This was how the Bank of England became controlled by the Rothschild family. This model was followed in quite a few other countries.

The Federal Reserve, being privately owned by a select group of banks, functions in much the same way. The major difference is that there was no need for a banking 'coup de etat' in order for governmental control to be stripped and given to a select few.

That's quite another story.

————————————-

:francis:
 

ThrobbingHood

“I’m Sorry for 2025”
Joined
Nov 11, 2017
Messages
34,144
Reputation
17,499
Daps
240,765
I have another theory that the main plot of the movie was an allegory for affirmative action and the subliminal fear of black men displacing white supremacy on a level playing field. And how white men know how without the system propping them up, they can’t survive.
 

Mr. Negative

Conspiracy Weirdo
Supporter
Joined
Aug 10, 2012
Messages
28,944
Reputation
8,427
Daps
81,650
Reppin
A Mississippi Cotton Field
I have another theory that the main plot of the movie was an allegory for affirmative action and the subliminal fear of black men displacing white supremacy on a level playing field. And how white men know how without the system propping them up, they can’t survive.


tumblr_n6zdmspPiE1skh0gdo1_400.gif
 

419scam

The Super Duper
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
2,771
Reputation
348
Daps
8,969
I have a theory that the movie was about two smart guys getting that felling good/looking good money
 

3rdWorld

Veteran
Joined
Mar 24, 2014
Messages
47,545
Reputation
4,659
Daps
139,428
I have another theory that the main plot of the movie was an allegory for affirmative action and the subliminal fear of black men displacing white supremacy on a level playing field. And how white men know how without the system propping them up, they can’t survive.

This.
You can't miss this, even as a child watching you knew the deeper meaning.
 

UpAndComing

Veteran
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
70,022
Reputation
17,492
Daps
300,122
I have another theory that the main plot of the movie was an allegory for affirmative action and the subliminal fear of black men displacing white supremacy on a level playing field. And how white men know how without the system propping them up, they can’t survive.

The type of movies Eddie Murphy was doing in the 80s and 90s made him a top 5 actor of all time. 95% of his roles where always in a position of leadership, strength, and as the protagonist
 
Top