Trump judicial nominee won't say if she agrees with ruling that ended racial segregation in schools

[88m3]

The Hill
6 hrs ·
Wendy Vitter, who was nominated by President Trump to serve as a federal judge, refused to tell lawmakers whether or not she believes the Supreme Court ruling in Brown v. Board of Education, which ended racial segregation in schools, was “correctly decided.”


THEHILL.COM

Trump judicial nominee won't say if she agrees with ruling that ended racial segregation in schools
Wendy Vitter previously made headlines over her appearance at anti-abortion events.


thoughts?

 

[88m3]

@BarNone @ogc163 thoughts?

 

[Rout3r2035]

Kid's face in the OP needs to be smilied and sums up my response to this article and most things these days

 

[No1]

@BarNone @ogc163 thoughts?

She is racist. Point blank.

 

[GnauzBookOfRhymes]

her husband was the one who liked to wear diapers when patronizing prostitutes

 

[88m3]

her husband was the one who liked to wear diapers when patronizing prostitutes

Thanks, I could tell the photo was dated and dikk Cheney is next to her so I was trying to put it all together

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

the common argument from conservatives is HOW it was done...which is...interesting.

Of course she's racist...but the legal arguments are always so tenuous.

 

[DEAD7]

Is the argument being made in this thread that there is absolutely no grounds for objection/disagreement with the ruling outside of being a racist?

 

[DirtyD]

Is the argument being made in this thread that there is absolutely no grounds for objection/disagreement with the ruling outside of being a racist?

 

[Sohh_lifted]

Is the argument being made in this thread that there is absolutely no grounds for objection/disagreement with the ruling outside of being a racist?

.....wtf?

 

[DEAD7]

.....wtf?

That’s a yes... got it.

 

[mastermind]

The free markets

 

[Secure Da Bag]

Is the argument being made in this thread that there is absolutely no grounds for objection/disagreement with the ruling outside of being a racist?

The argument being made is that if you can't say what are the grounds for objecting Brown vs BoE, then grounds are probably racist (to some degree).

 

[88m3]

The argument being made is that if you can't say what are the grounds for objecting Brown vs BoE, then grounds are probably racist (to some degree).

Do you disprove of the premise?

 

[Secure Da Bag]

Do you disprove of the premise?

Her premise that answering that question turns the questioning into a slippery slope and is pretty much a gotcha question.

Or the premise that her dodging the question is high indication that she has racist tendencies.

I think both premises are true.