Posted on Sat Mar 14 00:18:11 2026 UTC
A Substack investigation claims Florida's 2024 election results were manipulated, based on two main findings:
The Amendment 4 math — Florida's abortion rights amendment needed 60% to pass and fell just short at 57.2%. The writer argues the total "Yes" votes needed to hit exactly 60% matches the state's total early vote count for registered Republicans and Democrats to the exact digit — two figures that should have no relationship to each other.
"Burke County" — A county that doesn't exist appeared in election night reporting feeds at 7:31pm containing approximately 6.3 million votes. The article argues the vote totals within it match Florida's early ballot figures exactly, and that the maths shows Harris's certified state total can be derived entirely from that vote bank.
Before Election Day, Florida law requires all mail-in and early in-person votes to be entered into the Election Management System by 7pm on November 4th — the day before Election Day. This means the total early vote figure (6,371,645) was a known, fixed number sitting in the system before a single Election Day ballot was cast.
What the article alleges happened
Rather than real votes flowing in from Florida's 67 actual counties, the author argues that this pre-known total was loaded into a single fictional data entry — "Burke County" — and used as a pool to distribute votes between candidates in predetermined proportions.
Think of it like a spreadsheet: instead of 67 rows of real county data adding up to a total, someone allegedly created one master row containing the answer they wanted, then worked backwards to make the individual county figures fit.
Why "Burke County" matters
When the article's author adds up all the presidential candidate votes attributed to Burke County and accounts for minor candidates, the total comes to exactly 6,371,645 — the same early vote figure. The argument is that this is statistically impossible by coincidence, because those two numbers should have no relationship to each other whatsoever.
The author concludes the results were predetermined and calls on state legislators and attorneys general to investigate. The article also references similar "ghost county" anomalies in swing states and draws a comparison to alleged Republican vote routing in the 2004 Ohio election.
What do you think?