What sort of right-wing bullshyt attempt to win internet points is this?
If it must be told, I'm an independent contractor who has attained enough economic freedom in life that I can pick up or drop contracts whenever I feel like it. Technically I do have a "boss" because I'm on a contract, but I set my own duties and hours because they've agreed to my proffered services and I report maybe every few weeks. I have a number of employees, some of which come as part of the deal and some of which I pick up for the particular contract.
That's all you're gonna get out of that useless diversion, do you want to whip them out next?
If Obama was appointing Democratic Socialists to any prominent economic position then I'd be impressed as fukk! The fact that he NEVER did such a thing tells you how well your analogy works.
And no, my argument was not just "the Deputy UnderSecretary of Treasury said he was a neoliberal." It was that he said he was a straight shill for neoliberals and he described the entire movement of thought and governance he was a part of as neoliberals. He called the neoliberals he was a part of "Rubin Democrats" after the fukking Secretary of the Treasury. YES, I think the political position of the Secretary of the Treasury and those under him informs us quite strongly on a president's economic policy.
And on top of that, the part of the argument you're completely ignoring is that I also showed that Greenspan, Summers, and Bernanke were at the forefront of Clinton/Bush/Obama economic policy, and they treated Milton Friedman, the Godfather of neoliberalism, as if he were their best friend or greatest hero. You just want to sweep that under the rug and pretend like that shyt didn't happen. You just want to pretend that Obama putting a huge Friedman stan who was one of Bush's economic advisers at the front of his economic recovery didn't happen. You tried to claim that Clinton and Obama were so radically different in economic policy that they couldn't be mentioned under the same title even though they had all the same people on the top. The fact that you just ignored all of this to talk about "I'm a boss" and repeat multiple times how you were going to destroy me tells me exactly how strong your argument is.
You picked the neoliberals that you say are neoliberals as the “only leaders” for Obama, Clinton and Bush for their economic strategies.
there’s a vast difference between the leaders of bush’s presidency and Obama’s presidency. Just bc u found some overlap for what you define a neoliberal is doesn’t mean their administrations were run or even inflicted by neoliberalism as forefront idea.
It’s comical to think that, so you know who bush had?
ur comparing that to who Obama had? Bc they had 3-5 of the same ppl.
3-5 ppl don’t dictate an entire economic strategy. That’s fukking insane to think that.
stop being so sensitive about the employee comment, most ppl are employees and will remain so. I say that to everyone.