His post proves this as true. Amazing how you do not see that. We are always the first target, the main one harmed. We were never next, because we are always first.“We were already being targeted.”
“400 years.”
“Fear mongering.”
“Both sides.”
His post proves this as true. Amazing how you do not see that. We are always the first target, the main one harmed. We were never next, because we are always first.“We were already being targeted.”
“400 years.”
“Fear mongering.”
“Both sides.”
Highly presumptive. You do realize all labor boards have been functionally gutted at the federal level, right? If Kamala is President and they go ham doing this, we still have NLRB and other agencies that can intercede. Pretending the current worse case was an inevitability is wildly bold and presumably wrong.This would've happened regardless of who won. Part of the "white-lash" against Kamala winning would've been cac middle managers being even more racially biased against Black applicants. And Kamala probably would've expanded the H-1B visa program.
These dudes are dummies man. Trump has systematically reduced racial protections in the labor markets and they still on that smart dumb bullshytHighly presumptive. You do realize all labor boards have been functionally gutted at the federal level, right? If Kamala is President and they go ham doing this, we still have NLRB and other agencies that can intercede. Pretending the current worse case was an inevitability is wildly bold and presumably wrong.
Like with anything, when the enforcement arm is gone, bad actors act. AND we know Kamala wasn't going to gut the shyt out of specific regions where black federal employment was the lynchpin of the economy.
![]()
Source: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
Thats yall MAGA president though and Kamala woulda had weekly mandatory chicken tikka masala or whatever the fukk yall were upset about

You quoting this in this manner misses the point. Us being a target is one thing. What if we go from staffing 20% of the government to 10%, losing labor deals, having all federal grants for us frozen, etc.His post proves this as true. Amazing how you do not see that. We are always the first target, the main one harmed. We were never next, because we are always first.
My org had to sanitize a bunch of language, recently had layoffs (directly related to Trump), and is rolling back black and minority initiatives to try to make them more all-encompassing where they can.These dudes are dummies man. Trump has systematically reduced racial protections in the labor markets and they still on that smart dumb bullshyt
Dumb ppl are the reason we’re where we are. It’s reached a critical level

No, it actually proves that the bolded statement you threw into your list was asinine—because the very thread you're posting in confirms that it's true.You quoting this in this manner misses the point. Us being a target is one thing. What if we go from staffing 20% of the government to 10%, losing labor deals, having all federal grants for us frozen, etc.
Look at pre-2025 and compare it to now. Disingenuously swerving into the discourse when we see a pattern of escalation has gotten way too frequent of a move lately. We see a full-court press that was not present before this calendar year and trying to tamp it down with that old "Its already happening" refrain is insulting.
This would've happened regardless of who won. Part of the "white-lash" against Kamala winning would've been cac middle managers being even more racially biased against Black applicants. And Kamala probably would've expanded the H-1B visa program.
@At30wecashout
Going by your responses, dudes who backed Trump still have a hard time conceding that they were WRONG. You will eventually ignore list them.
I'm gonna be as concise as possible: this WHOLE post is some over-analyzing bullshyt, respectfully. Don't expect me to go responding like this in the future cause I enjoy your postingNo, it actually proves that the bolded statement you threw into your list was asinine—because the very thread you're posting in confirms that it's true.
What you tried to do was use those statements as a vehicle to attack other Black people. But one of the choices you listed is directly supported by the thread itself. Just because you want to treat that bolded statement as if it's a falsehood doesn't mean you're immune from correction. Misusing a statement that is demonstrably true doesn't make your attack valid—it just exposes your intent.
Many of you enjoy attacking each other more than you care about actually being accurate.