I never said it wasn't written in antiquity. Arguably it wasn't because there are many Bibles to speak of but I never mentioned this. You arguing about shyt was never said.
I was talking about the facts of the Bible, which has few. . I didn't write much, just gave a brief run down on Ancient Rome's politics, role of religion and how they treated Jews. Things easily found with a simple search, Romans even wrote down most of this shyt. I could even go on about how the Jews treated other Jewish miracleworker/ messiahs of Christ's period too. There's Roman and Islamic commentary on that too.
You still haven't attempted to refute anything I wrote. Sounds like this argument is done.
There is nothing to refute because you’re moving goal posts. You wrong I’m right, along with VERIFIED history. Sounds like you got finessed with your education because your objective facts are lacking!
The science of textual criticism literally reveals to us the oldest manuscripts of the Bible and those that are forged.
Bruh you’re not on my level with this and your knowledge of all the research and information is lacking.


when the hell did I question the Bible's origin, its age or authenticity. Its simply not a book of history, a book that provides a reliable chronicle of History. What aren't you getting?

