Same government that was protecting the fields just a few years ago. The uptick in heroin in the states coincided strongly with our war in Afghanistan. We gave protection to opium farmers who rape little boys just so they would side with us against ge taliban. Now we’re bombing our previous allies. Circle of war keeps rolling
We need the afghan people on our side
The afghan people rely on opium production
We don't want the Taliban profiting either
We blow up opium production in the hopes that Taliban is harmed
But at the same time everyone knows the Taliban will always be a part of any future afghan government
The market (US/Europe) for opium derived products will never die, so opium production will continue
So at the end of the day, the afghan people continue to be fukked
We need to have a face to face with the Taliban and come to some sort of "understanding." They're not any worse than the Saudis or some of the other fukkd up governments we deal with.
Such a clusterfukk
the majority of the opium goes east but whatever floats your boat
Our soldiers and tax dollars shouldn’t be used to guard opium warlords. My buddies in the military used to do protective details for opium farms. It was not spoken about.
Lol at it all going east. Afghan produces something like 97% of the entire supply. There’s zero chance it doesn’t end up in the states. Mexico doesn’t have the manufacturing capacity yet.
They're not interested.
Who?
The Taliban.
Same government that was protecting the fields just a few years ago. The uptick in heroin in the states coincided strongly with our war in Afghanistan. We gave protection to opium farmers who rape little boys just so they would side with us against ge taliban. Now we’re bombing our previous allies. Circle of war keeps rolling
The CIA extended the mantle of their alliance to these drug lords and in every case the drug lords used it to expand a small local trade in opium into a major source of supply for the world markets and the United States.
While they were allied with the United States these drug lords were absolutely immune to any kind of investigation. If you're involved in any kind of illicit commodity trade, organized crime activity like drug trafficking, there is only one requisite for success, immunity, and the CIA gave them that. As long as they were allied with the CIA, the local police and then the DEA stayed away from the drug lords.
Finally, if there were any allegations about the involvement of their allies in the drug trade, the CIA would use their good offices to quash those allegations.
This meant that these drug lords, connected with the CIA, and protected by the CIA, were able to release periodic heroin surges, and [in Latin America] periodic cocaine surges. You can trace very precisely during the 40 years of the cold war, the upsurge in narcotics supply in the United States with covert operations.
Who were the manufacturers? They were all either military factions connected with Pakistan intelligence, CIA allies, or Afghan resistance groups connected with the CIA and Pakistan intelligence. In May of 1990, ten years after this began, the Washington Post finally ran a front page story saying high U.S. officials admit that Gulbuddin Hekmatyar [leader of the Hezbi-i Islami guerilla group], and other leaders of the Afghan resistance are leading heroin manufacturers.
This had been known for years, reported in the Pakistan press, indeed in 1980 reported in McClean's magazine. In fact in 1980 a White House narcotics advisor, Dr. David Musto of Yale University, went on the record demanding that we not ally with Afghan guerilla groups that were involved in narcotics. His advice was ignored and he went public in an op-ed in the New York Times.