Venezuela invalidates 600K signatures for recall election, Maduro says no recall until 2017

Scoop

All Star
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
6,138
Reputation
-2,680
Daps
9,762
Venezuela: Nicolas Maduro says no referendum this year
  • 12 June 2016
  • From the sectionLatin America & Caribbean

  • _89950301_89950300.jpg
    Image copyrightAFP
Image captionMr Maduro was elected in 2013 for a six-year term
Venezuela's President Nicolas Maduro has said that a referendum the opposition is trying to call to oust him will not take place this year.

There was no time to organise the recall referendum, said Mr Maduro.

On Friday the National Electoral Council (CNE) declared more than 600,000 signatures on a petition for the referendum invalid.

The opposition says the electoral authorities are working alongside the government to derail the process.

Opposition leaders say their signatures on the petition have also been invalidated, revealing the electoral council's bias.

Former presidential candidate Henrique Capriles is among those who say their signatures have been ruled out for "failing to meet the requirements".

The Speaker of the National Assembly, Henry Ramos Allup, described the move as "shameful" and "a provocation".

Timing essential
President Maduro accused the opposition of fraud and said he would ask the Supreme Court on Monday to annul the process.

"If they meet the requirements, the recall referendum will take place next year, full stop" said Mr Maduro at a rally in Caracas.

"If they don't meet the requirements, there will be no recall referendum, full stop."

_89949954_89949953.jpg
Image copyrightREUTERS
Image captionMr Capriles lost the fiercely fought 2013 election to Mr Maduro
Timing is essential for both sides. If the referendum is held by 10 January 2017 and President Maduro loses, a new election will be called.

If it is held after that date and the vote goes against him, his vice-president takes over and remains in power until the end of the presidential term, in January 2019.

'Economic war'
The opposition handed over the petition on 2 May.

It said it had gathered the signatures of 1.85 million voters backing a recall referendum, many more than the 197,000 needed at this initial stage. The CNE said on Friday there were 1.97 million signatures on the list.

The voters whose signatures have not been struck off by the CNE - more than 1.3 million people - will need to turn up at regional electoral offices to confirm their identities later this month.

They will have five days from 20 June to have their signatures checked, CNE President Tibisay Lucena announced on Friday.

Mr Capriles urged voters to get ready to comply with the CNE demand and go to government offices to have their identities checked later this month.

_89949960_c47965df-d9de-4344-86d4-577c15c1c1ff.jpg
Image copyrightRONALD GRANT
Image captionThe chronic shortage of food and basic goods has led to clashes and skirmishes across Venezuela
Venezuela is in a serious economic crisis, which the opposition blames on mistaken left-wing policies of Mr Maduro and his predecessor, the late Hugo Chavez.

The inflation rate is one of the highest in the world and there are long queues outside shops.

Mr Maduro says the shortage of goods is the result of an economic war waged by the country's elite against his government.

_89950292_acd7fc3b-b96e-4f09-a7bf-0415c1a5b025.jpg
Image copyrightAP
Image captionFor the referendum to be successful, almost 7.6 million people will have to vote to oust Mr Maduro
  • 1% of voters on the electoral roll have to sign a petition within 30 days to kick-start the process
  • 20% of voters (almost four million) have to sign a second petition in order to trigger the referendum
  • For the referendum to be successful, an equal or greater number of voters than those who elected Mr Maduro would have to cast their vote in favour of the recall - he won the 2013 election with 7,587,579 votes
Venezuela: Nicolas Maduro says no referendum this year - BBC News
 

CHL

Superstar
Joined
Jul 6, 2014
Messages
13,456
Reputation
1,480
Daps
19,582
:sas2: who is better suited to write a critique of socialism..a man who bust his guns for socialism or some HL Starbucks socialists...jussayin
Are you going to take a look at the article? :jbhmm:

Or maybe look into Orwell's thoughts on Capitalism and Imperialism? :jbhmm:
 

ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ

Doctors without Labcoats
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,180
Reputation
-2,180
Daps
14,762
Reppin
Payments accepted Obamacare,paypal and livestock
It took you 3 minutes to see the post, read the article and reply?
:yeshrug: fast reader...its a gift

Brian Rubin quotes Llew Gardner of the Daily Worker: “When he wrote 1984, the anti-socialist work that shocked the nation on television, George Orwell was sick in mind and body, a fast dying man”
The anarchists tend to hold Orwell in high regard, appreciating his criticism of totalitarian regimes of both the right and left and his understanding of imperialism and capitalist values which can be seen in his earliest books, In 1933 he wrote:
Despite having strong words to say against authoritarianism, Orwell had an acute awareness of the dangers that could arise from the apparent renunciation of power and the nature of moral coercion and the force of public opinion. In 1946, in an essay entitled Politics vs. literature he wrote:

“In a society in which there is no law, and in theory no compulsion, the only arbiter of behaviour is public opinion. But public opinion, because of the tremendous urge to conformity in gregarious animals is less tolerant than any system of law. When human beings are governed by “thou shalt not”, the individual can practise a certain amount of eccentricity: when they are supposedly governed by “love” or “reason”, he is under continuous pressure to make him behave and think in exactly the same way as everyone else.”

:francis:
 

CHL

Superstar
Joined
Jul 6, 2014
Messages
13,456
Reputation
1,480
Daps
19,582
:yeshrug: fast reader...its a gift





:francis:
Throughout his novels, documentaries, essays and journalism Orwell relentlessly and uncompromisingly criticised imperialism, nationalism, capitalism, political dishonesty, power, totalitarianism, privilege and private education. He claimed to be a democratic socialist, joining the Independent Labour Party in June 1938

He also suggested that there should be “Limitation of incomes, on such a scale that the highest tax-free income in Britain does not exceed the lowest by more than ten to one"

Nevertheless in this, arguably his worst book, Orwell describes the inefficiency and contradictions of capitalism when he wrote of British capitalists selling war materials to Germany:

“Right at the end of August 1939 the British dealers were tumbling over one another in their eagerness to sell Germany tin, rubber, copper and shellac - and this in the clear, certain knowledge that war was going to break out in a week or two. It was about as sensible as selling somebody a razor to cut your throat with. But it was "good business".”

“ . . . among the parties on the Government side the Communists stood not upon the extreme Left, but upon the extreme Right . . . In particular, the USSR is in alliance with France, a capitalist-imperialist country. The alliance is of little use to Russia unless French capitalism is strong, therefore Communist policy in France has got to be anti-revolutionary.”

A common view held by the political right-wing is that Orwell exposed the horrors of "socialism" by predicting what would happen under a regime of the Stalinist model which the right-wing claims to be representative of all socialist ideals, conveniently ignoring the fact that he was writing about state capitalism represented as socialism and that the book was intended to be satire and not prediction. Also conveniently ignored are his other writings depicting the evils of imperialism, the inherent unfairness of privilege and the inefficiency and self-interest of capitalism.

:jbhmm:
 

ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ

Doctors without Labcoats
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,180
Reputation
-2,180
Daps
14,762
Reppin
Payments accepted Obamacare,paypal and livestock
I didnt read you little bytch fight, but don't subscribe it to socialism or capitalism. Their government failed them.

Nah..their govt fukked up the economy with chavez bolivarianism..socialism is to blame
chavismo policies include nationalization, social welfare programs, and opposition to neoliberalism (particularly the policies of the IMF and the World Bank). According to Hugo Chávez, Venezuelan socialism accepts private property,[13] but this socialism seeks to promote social property too.[14]Chavismo also support participatory democracy[15]and workplace democracy.[16] In January 2007, Chávez proposed to build the communal state, whose main idea is to build self-government institutions like communal councils,communes, and communal cities.[17]
 

CHL

Superstar
Joined
Jul 6, 2014
Messages
13,456
Reputation
1,480
Daps
19,582
Im starting to question your sanity..your socialist source itself tells you George Orwell criticized socialism DESPITE being a socialist himself so

dawg-wtf-you-saying.jpg
Q4hoxjH.png
Your comprehension skills are lacking.


Orwell was not a Socialist, though he called himself one. He was a Social Democrat and heavily critical of Capitalism and it's associated ideologies. You're confusing him attacking the State Capitalist USSR with attacking Socialism.


You're the guy who refuses to accept the existence of State Capitalism though right?
 
Top