Billboard and chartdata confirmed the most songs you have, the biggest numbers you'll be able to move first week.I don't get what # of songs have to do with anything.
Personally, the more songs an album have the less likely I am to listen to it immediately. But if it's a good 30 minutes I might even play it twice
This opinion has been debunked by HDD, Chartdata and Billboard. They confirmed more songs = more sales and its why we're now seeing a lot of artists trying to release between 20 & 30 tracks.I don't get what # of songs have to do with anything.
Personally, the more songs an album have the less likely I am to listen to it immediately. But if it's a good 30 minutes I might even play it twice
You def don’t get no p*ssy typing like thatKendrick doing this with a small album, in an era where its been confirmed the most tracks = the most sales
fukk a King Kendrick
fukk a King Kunta
fukk a Cornrow Kenny
fukk a KungFu Kenny
Here's Super Kenny
![]()
How do they control for that?Billboard and chartdata confirmed the most songs you have, the biggest numbers you'll be able to move first week.
Longer albums (actually, albums with a high number of songs) have been confirmed to be a massive advantage in the dsp era. It's considered as a way to manipulate streaming charts. They're struggling to find a way to fight this.I don't get what # of songs have to do with anything.
Personally, the more songs an album have the less likely I am to listen to it immediately. But if it's a good 30 minutes I might even play it twice.
I also wouldn't list a collabo album as a Drake album, his latest solo did 400k