Well Damn Marco Rubio attempts to start World War III

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,496
Reputation
-2,239
Daps
17,848
Wow. How brothers just spew out White noise :lolbron:, and really think they're intellectual Christopher Columbus'.


Yep. We have you all figured out. All you have to offer is disinfo and misdirections. Thats why we should trust the media to inform us of the "banking cartels" actions because they're not on the same team right?
:sas2:

Bread and circuses - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"This phrase originates from Rome in Satire X of the Roman satirical poet Juvenal (circa A.D. 100). In context, the Latinpanem et circenses (bread and circuses) identifies the only remaining cares of a Roman populace which no longer cares for its historical birthright of political involvement. Here Juvenal displays his contempt for the declining heroismof contemporary Romans.[5] Roman politicians passed laws in 140 B.C. to keep the votes of poorer citizens, by introducing a grain dole: giving out cheap food and entertainment, "bread and circuses", became the most effective way to rise to power."
:ohhh:

Learn something new everyday

While you may have learned something new, you can see that the "bread and circuses" we're faced with today, are not anything new. Brings new credence to the biblical phrase: "Theres nothing new under the sun". But brehs like sinnister and Domingo the banker want us to believe that the bankers who issue money to nations, finance wars (often both sides like US is most likely doing in Syria), do not care about what the media that is (supposed to be) in place to inform people reports lol. The hilarity...
 

MrSinnister

Delete account when possible.
Joined
Aug 1, 2015
Messages
5,323
Reputation
325
Daps
6,832
@King-Over-Kingz I'm 1000% sure you'd sell out. Yes, I would bet 10 for each of your 1 on it. It's always the yapping dogs that can't wait to bounce the most. I don't understand 10% of the shot you're talking about, because it is so off the wall, which is what started our discourse in the first place. You attacked me about trying to spread disinformation, when you don't even know what the fukk any of it means. This is just all of the conspiracies you've ever imagined, tied into a bow, and you believe in it, like a religion, even if you have ZERO proof of any connection you've made. A lot of us waste out time on shot like this, probably to justify how useless we actually are in the big picture.

Like every industry, banks have investments in the media. When you see the credits of movies, you'd usually see thanks to some banks. But instead of just sticking to that point that maybe they influence the content of SOME movies to be presented in a better light (yeah, like they LOVE to encourage people ROBBING them because they're insured :mjlol:), you gotta have these fukkers tapped in like Elliot Carver and Blofeld put together :comeon:, in that they control the minds of celebrities, and news centers, and people's careers and marriages that they have ZERO investment in :merchant:. Again, if you simply didn't pretend you knew shut because you were a Pacific stand and came to me with some respect, I wouldn't have to be so harsh about it. But YOU are the disinformation agent, and I urge you to really go to college, so you can have textbooks, and see how much information you'd have to KNOW to pull of shut on the scale you're talking, to get the effect wanted.

Again, all industries have a large hand in current news media. News media is SEPARATE from entertainment media. It's why Fox Entertainment can have Black exploitation shows like Empire, while Fox News, a subsidiary can call everything Black related akin to terrorism :snoop:. They have their hands in the news departments to keep negative news from being put into the public discourse.

If everything was as you say, there would be not big bank closing. Banks were forced to merge to keep that very thing from happening, lest be put out of business. No one forced us to bail them out, but corrupt officials who didn't want to take the heat of Glass-Steagall being removed that would've wiped out a lot of accounts in 2008. An Illuminati-led world wouldn't have allowed such a colossal failure in its most important industry. So if these enlightened people couldn't forsee or prevent a banks collapse or the Libor scandal, how the duck are they going to get Kim Kardashian to show her as every year:pachaha:, when they obviously have so many fires to put out? How the fukk are they gonna let gas get to less than 40 bucks a barrel, when it's their biggest, and longest cash crop? How the fukk are they gonna allow Paris massacres, so close to where they're supposed to originate, when they play both sides to nearly every war? Nah, that's the defense contractors, another cartel with deep hands in the media.

Again, all the shot you're thinking is a conspiracy is happening right in front of you, in broad daylight. Eric Holder could've destroyed both the banking cartels and defense contractor cartels (he actually has Illuminati power), but went right back to work for those banks throw his old firm. Right in front of you. Remember that line, and stop making everything seem so foreign and mythical.

Like Hillary after him, you all are too emotionally invested in people that blatantly lie to you, and show you their real agenda. The TPP was debated, and passed, in complete prvacy, by a president who promised to be the "most transparent ever". Ya'll bought his bullshyt, because he appropriates Black things every now and then, and you've made him a mythical creature. "It's either him or the insane Republican", yaw keep saying, never auditing where they're getting their campaign money from. It's THOSE people who run your country and world affairs, not some fukking old ass bedtime story to explain why brothers who get rich always seem to sell out, which is what most Illuminati bullshyt, when you listen to brothers speak it, boils down to. Just a witch hunt on those who made it, because they don't seem as "Black" to you anymore. So save the RR Martin version of it. All of you have a different story about it, and it's not that good at all.
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,496
Reputation
-2,239
Daps
17,848
@King-Over-Kingz I'm 1000% sure you'd sell out. Yes, I would bet 10 for each of your 1 on it. It's always the yapping dogs that can't wait to bounce the most.

Yep I expect these words from you. They sound exactly like an aint shyt nikka. Just cuz YOU arent shyt it now means everyone else is around you is as well. Nope. Its you bud. YOU would sell out. Not EVERYONE else.

I don't understand 10% of the shot you're talking about, because it is so off the wall, which is what started our discourse in the first place.

You dont understand what Im saying because you still on level 1 of this shyt. All you know is that "something exists". Thats level 1 of understanding exactly what they're trying to do. Theres levels to this shyt and its clear you dont understand that which is why you thought they left entertainment/the media alone while they just went and did whatever they wanted. When the media distracting people is EXACTLY what allows them to do what they want whenever they want. Because the media (who is supposed to be informing its constituents) is ignoring their actions because they know who pays whose bills.

You attacked me about trying to spread disinformation, when you don't even know what the fukk any of it means. This is just all of the conspiracies you've ever imagined, tied into a bow, and you believe in it, like a religion, even if you have ZERO proof of any connection you've made. A lot of us waste out time on shot like this, probably to justify how useless we actually are in the big picture.

More baseless attacks :mjlol:

Breh I called you out for your BS and you got your panties in a bunch. Thats AFTER you disrespected people first by calling those who believe SIMILARLY to you weak minded people who are looking to compensate for their failures. So how can your FIRST post be disrespectful (doesnt matter that it did not apply to me, it was still disrespectful to those it did apply to) then complain about yourself being met with that same disrespect? And thats without even considering that in all reality, what you're saying isnt far from what those illumanti conspiracists say. The difference is that you leave out the influence they have over entertainment/media while the conspiracists usually leave out the economic policies/laws that are passed to focus on the entertainment.

Like every industry, banks have investments in the media. When you see the credits of movies, you'd usually see thanks to some banks. But instead of just sticking to that point that maybe they influence the content of SOME movies to be presented in a better light (yeah, like they LOVE to encourage people ROBBING them because they're insured :mjlol:), you gotta have these fukkers tapped in like Elliot Carver and Blofeld put together :comeon:, in that they control the minds of celebrities, and news centers, and people's careers and marriages that they have ZERO investment in :merchant:.

Oh first it was "they dont care" now its "bu..bu.... but... They have investments :sadcam:"

Any more backpedaling you wanna do? I already explained why they chose to control the media, news centers and celebrities. I'll do it one more time and lets see if you have anything concrete to offer other than your backhanded insults and whinings.

Media/News Centers- If they did not control this avenue, then we would see this industry commenting on their actions. Notice I said commenting. I didnt even mention condemning it which they should be doing. Yet the media/news centers are mum about their actions. Let me get shot by a cop and they'll plaster tthat over every news station. Now answer me, how does one black guy getting killed by a cop affect me moreso than a group of people steering this nation to the left or wright based on their own whims and opinions and not the whims and opinions of the constituents that make things happen?

Again, if you simply didn't pretend you knew shut because you were a Pacific stand and came to me with some respect, I wouldn't have to be so harsh about it. But YOU are the disinformation agent, and I urge you to really go to college, so you can have textbooks, and see how much information you'd have to KNOW to pull of shut on the scale you're talking, to get the effect wanted.

Now you're suggesting for me to go to college as if they're going to tell me the truth about what those in power are currently doing or even have done in the past. You think Nazi Germany was teaching their students the truth of reality or a biased version of it so that those that were learning would learn and eventually do in a way that benefits Nazi Germany? Where did those Nazi's run off to after the war again?

Dont remember? Look up operation paperclip :sas2:

Again, all industries have a large hand in current news media. News media is SEPARATE from entertainment media. It's why Fox Entertainment can have Black exploitation shows like Empire, while Fox News, a subsidiary can call everything Black related akin to terrorism :snoop:. They have their hands in the news departments to keep negative news from being put into the public discourse.

You're so off base with what you're trying to say that you're proving my point. The same entity owns Empire as well as Fox news. So what does that tell you if they're giving blacks entertainment at one end, while clowning them on the other? That they're playing both sides?

If everything was as you say, there would be not big bank closing. Banks were forced to merge to keep that very thing from happening, lest be put out of business. No one forced us to bail them out, but corrupt officials who didn't want to take the heat of Glass-Steagall being removed that would've wiped out a lot of accounts in 2008. An Illuminati-led world wouldn't have allowed such a colossal failure in its most important industry. So if these enlightened people couldn't forsee or prevent a banks collapse or the Libor scandal, how the duck are they going to get Kim Kardashian to show her as every year:pachaha:, when they obviously have so many fires to put out? How the fukk are they gonna let gas get to less than 40 bucks a barrel, when it's their biggest, and longest cash crop? How the fukk are they gonna allow Paris massacres, so close to where they're supposed to originate, when they play both sides to nearly every war? Nah, that's the defense contractors, another cartel with deep hands in the media.

Breh, it doesnt matter if the banks fail in the manner you're discussing. Events like the one in 2008 show you that it doesnt matter. When they failed, what happened? They were bailed out. And you think the politicians bailed them out because thats what they (as in the politicians) wanted to do? Bahahahaha!!! They're puppets who do what they're told. Last one to not do what they were told, was killed (JFK). Everyone since has been in line. So what are you actually saying? They control the economy and control prices. They can make them go up, or go down, or remain stagnant. In fact, go to that Napoleon war and look how they manipulated the economy at that time. That is ONE family who did that who is STILL around. The rich ass bankers manipulated the economy into leaving them (the bankers) with everything. All you have to do is research.

And you're still playing dumb lol. Go on twitter and see how many followers Kim K has. Now tell me what would happen if Kim K was a female Malcolm X and the MILLIONS of people that follow her every move, word, tweet instagram post etc... were getting Malcolm X type/revolutionary words of encouragement each time they saw her instead of brainless shyt they usually get. Can you tell me how those in power would consider her? That would be a THREAT to them. So to make sure those things do not happen, they make sure they have control over who gets fame and who doesnt. If they let someone in who is not with them (lets say like a Katt Williams or Tupac) what happens? They're warned before they're ostracized, mistreated, and lastly for some, killed. Its not that hard of a concept if one isnt a disinfo agent trying to mislead people. Or if one isnt just as much of a weakminded and a sheeplike person as the people he (as in you) was mocking before. Yep. Easy to understand.


Again, all the shot you're thinking is a conspiracy is happening right in front of you, in broad daylight. Eric Holder could've destroyed both the banking cartels and defense contractor cartels (he actually has Illuminati power), but went right back to work for those banks throw his old firm. Right in front of you. Remember that line, and stop making everything seem so foreign and mythical.

There isnt anything mythical that I've said in this thread. I havent connected anything from the bible, or aliens/demons or about how your leaders worship an owl at the bohemian grove. I havent said anyting about how they want to do away with ALL religions and insert a new one where they or their spiritual leader is worshiped as god/gods Nope. I've said nothing about these things which you could call mythical. I've kept it strictly to what one can research and observe. So what you said is irrelevant because in this very thread I said they put things in PLAIN SIGHT or i.e.. RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU.

Like Hillary after him, you all are too emotionally invested in people that blatantly lie to you, and show you their real agenda. The TPP was debated, and passed, in complete prvacy, by a president who promised to be the "most transparent ever". Ya'll bought his bullshyt, because he appropriates Black things every now and then, and you've made him a mythical creature. "It's either him or the insane Republican", yaw keep saying, never auditing where they're getting their campaign money from. It's THOSE people who run your country and world affairs, not some fukking old ass bedtime story to explain why brothers who get rich always seem to sell out, which is what most Illuminati bullshyt, when you listen to brothers speak it, boils down to. Just a witch hunt on those who made it, because they don't seem as "Black" to you anymore. So save the RR Martin version of it. All of you have a different story about it, and it's not that good at all.

Aint no "ya'll bought this BS" when I knew from the jump Obama was a puppet like those before him. And Im in high school at the time telling brehs what the deal was. Didnt know shyt about what Im saying now but still knew that he would get elected and would do just as those before him. And those before him answered to those with money out the ass. Obama does the same. And his puppetry was proven even more when it came out that he is related to Bush, dikk Cheney and 40 or so other presidents as well. The fact that your words insinuate that any president or presidential candidate should be taken seriously exemplifies how you dont know shyt. Which I could tell from the jump which is why I called you out on your BS. Now just let this thread die. I dont want to embarrass you anymore in front of people who actually know whats going on and not your coli friends who get the news from Fox/CNN or even your banker friends like Domingo

:camby:
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,496
Reputation
-2,239
Daps
17,848
Whoa. Thats a long post lol. Tldr version:

1. The media is where the majority of people go to to be informed. THAT is why those in power sought to control it. So that the media/news centers would not call them (as in those in REAL power not politicians) out on their BS. Simple and plain.

2. The "banking cartels" care about controlling celebrities because thats who the majority of people look up to and idolize. if you had a bunch of revolutionary Tupac's, Malcolm X's, Bob Marley's and Marcus Garvey celebrities going around, how do you think that would influence the people? Dont you think it would make them MORE socially aware thus putting those in power in danger of being figured out? Of course! So thats why they make sure celebrities dumb people down by having the people focus on things that are trivial while ignoring things that matter. You dont understand this because you're still on level 1 when there is many levels to this shyt. Simple and plain

3. You cant talk about disrespect when your first post was disrespectful. Not to me, but thats irrelevant. You called those that believed as you do "weak minded" and added in how they're looking to "compensate for their failures." This is despite you believing similarly to them except you ignore the entertainment aspect of their control while the conspiracists ignore the economic aspect of their control. Yet now you're whining about how you werent met with respect? Why couldnt you take the words you're giving me about how I could have started this convo more respectfully and done that with your first post? As in why couldnt you make your point about how "the illumaniti" is made up without disrespecting anyone? I only bring this up because you''ve been whining about "disrespect" when you did the same thing in your first post.

4. I cant take you serious if you take the presidential candidates serious. I cant take you serious if you take politics serious. I cant take you serious if you take republicans or democrats serious. To me it shows you have no understanding. Which I knew from the jump which is why I called out your first post. Because I knew you were on the BS and I had time today cuh to show you how.....

If you come back with a response, lets see some answers to these. Let the other post be read by others but lets see if you have an answer for this shorter version of that other post. I left out how you never gave us a solution yet wagged your finger at those that said you cant beat them. I also left out how white boys such as John Todd and William cooper were talking about them before anybody black was while you say that blacks appropriated it lol. No, we'll pretend as if I didnt say that or you already answered those things. If you're really about the truth like you're trying to lead us on to believe, then you'll have an answer for the 4 points above.
 
Top