Excellent read. Presents a powerful case that the basis of the poverty line established in the early 60s if applied today would mean the poverty line for a family of four isn’t $31,200 but more along the lines of $140,000.
the poverty line for a family of four isn’t $31,200 but more along the lines of $140,000.
i'm gonna go with somewhere between those two numbers. a couple with 2 kids pulling down 140k a year is not "impoverished" in 80% of the countryIdk man. It explains why the election went the way it did to me. Everybody is struggling more than we (as a society) realize.i'm gonna go with somewhere between those two numbers. a couple with 2 kids pulling down 140k a year is not "impoverished" in 80% of the country
i just can't get behind that number. outside of major cities, in the vast majority of the country, a family of 4 living on 140k a year is not "impoverished" unless they spend money like absolute dikkheadsIdk man. It explains why the election went the way it did to me. Everybody is struggling more than we (as a society) realize.

The breakdown used in the piece:i just can't get behind that number. outside of major cities, in the vast majority of the country, a family of 4 living on 140k a year is not "impoverished" unless they spend money like absolute dikkheads
that's like 8 thousand a month after taxes. even if you have a 3k mortgage; that 5k doesn't leave you in "poverty"
Using conservative, national-average data:
Childcare: $32,773
Housing: $23,267
Food: $14,717
Transportation: $14,828
Healthcare: $10,567
Other essentials: $21,857
Required net income: $118,009
Add federal, state, and FICA taxes of roughly $18,500, and you arrive at a required gross income of $136,500.

i guess i can understand "i can't afford a comfortable middle class lifestyle" being the poverty line. but you would have to come up with a new word for actual poverty![]()
I mean, he did. “What we think is the poverty line is actually starvation.”i guess i can understand "i can't afford a comfortable middle class lifestyle" being the poverty line. but you would have to come up with a new word for actual poverty![]()
For 1963, that floor made sense. Housing was relatively cheap. A family could rent a decent apartment or buy a home on a single income, as we’ve discussed. Healthcare was provided by employers and cost relatively little (Blue Cross coverage averaged $10/month). Childcare didn’t really exist as a market—mothers stayed home, family helped, or neighbors (who likely had someone home) watched each other’s kids. Cars were affordable, if prone to breakdowns. With few luxury frills, the neighborhood kids in vo-tech could fix most problems when they did. College tuition could be covered with a summer job. Retirement meant a pension income, not a pile of 401(k) assets you had to fund yourself.

Instagram has warped people’s minds about “poverty"
MOST people are doing fine. They may not be thriving, which is a different topic
My wife took a part time job at a retail store out of boredom and for the discount, and was stunned to find out how much debt everyone was in who worked there. They make much less than us and probably have quadruple the debt.Taking away all of the racial problems from that time and currently, our striving for shareholder value really fukked up this country. We fukked up the bag.
I talk to younger coworkers about this type of stuff all of the time. And my wife and I had a depressing convo recently while seeing our youngest’s math teacher working a second job at Bath and Body Works.
What’s hilarious is the writer of the article is clearly right leaning. At best he’s a staunch moderate.The voice of the GOP. Your lack of empathy is a defining characteristic.