What can Democrats do about their poor social media presence?

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
26,390
Reputation
4,597
Daps
120,601
Reppin
Detroit
Not sure if it's a popular opinion or not, but IMO one of the biggest reasons Democrats struggle is that it come to social media, the right absolutely dominates. You go on almost any platform (Facebook, Reddit, wherever) and it's dominated by racist memes, anti-SJW complaining, etc.

I'm not too sure why this is considering Dem voters are younger on average. Zuckerberg? Not enough focus on social media in general from party leadership? Lack of younger people put in positions to help?


But in any case...does HL agree that this is an issue? And if so what can be done?
 

BillBanneker

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
9,009
Reputation
696
Daps
20,137
Reppin
NULL
Not sure if it's a popular opinion or not, but IMO one of the biggest reasons Democrats struggle is that it come to social media, the right absolutely dominates. You go on almost any platform (Facebook, Reddit, wherever) and it's dominated by racist memes, anti-SJW complaining, etc.

I'm not too sure why this is considering Dem voters are younger on average. Zuckerberg? Not enough focus on social media in general from party leadership? Lack of younger people put in positions to help?


But in any case...does HL agree that this is an issue? And if so what can be done?

I think the right wing (not necessarily the gop), is just better funded and understands the power of it (they also have a much clearer narrative to push). Dem and dem donors seem more-so attached to individuals and specific races than spreading general ideas and dogma that the right likes to.
 

Adeptus Astartes

Loyal servant of the God-Brehmperor
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Messages
12,959
Reputation
3,347
Daps
78,425
Reppin
Imperium of Man
It's crazy because Dean and Obama pioneered internet politicking. How did they give up the game? The dems are just soft in general and loath to attack their opponents.

I also believe the hate filled insurgent narrative of the right makes them seem bigger than they are.
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
33,587
Reputation
3,958
Daps
78,478
Reppin
New York
It's crazy because Dean and Obama pioneered internet politicking. How did they give up the game? The dems are just soft in general and loath to attack their opponents.

I also believe the hate filled insurgent narrative of the right makes them seem bigger than they are.
They were doing Cambridge Analytica type stuff which has fallen out of vogue and demonized by the Dems.
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
66,683
Reputation
17,225
Daps
275,018
Reppin
Oakland
i don't know why yall think that's the answer. the dem tent with it's various ID groups and constituents who lean more toward independent thinking or outright contrarianism aren't going to be as easily swayed by a few popular talking heads. you got too many different types of people to reach as opposed to brainwashing the racist and dumb on the right (the old guard, fiscal conservative GOPers don't need media to get on code, they use it to keep their poor constituents in their camp)
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
33,587
Reputation
3,958
Daps
78,478
Reppin
New York
i don't know why yall think that's the answer. the dem tent with it's various ID groups and constituents who lean more toward independent thinking or outright contrarianism aren't going to be as easily swayed by a few popular talking heads. you got too many different types of people to reach as opposed to brainwashing the racist and dumb on the right (the old guard, fiscal conservative GOPers don't need media to get on code, they use it to keep their poor constituents in their camp)
That was Obama's bread and butter and it worked.
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
33,587
Reputation
3,958
Daps
78,478
Reppin
New York
1. we've established that people need to stop benchmarking obama as the norm
2. that was in the early days of SM, before it became the fragmented vortex that it is
We? I don't think I was included in that agreement.
You said it had to do with, "ID groups and constituents who lean more toward independent thinking or outright contrarianism". Were only one type of Dem using social media in the beginning or are you changing your argument?
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
66,683
Reputation
17,225
Daps
275,018
Reppin
Oakland
We? I don't think I was included in that agreement.
You said it had to do with, "ID groups and constituents who lean more toward independent thinking or outright contrarianism". Were only one type of Dem using social media in the beginning or are you changing your argument?
you're really being obtuse here :aicmon:

the number of people on twitter in 08 - 6M, 2020 - 330M monthly active users (WW #'s, not just US)
percent of US adults using FB in 08 - 21%, 2019 - 79%

so a once in a lifetime candidate using a nascent SM to engage a much smaller number of people is easily repeatable? the same SM most people bemoan for how toxic it's become, how many echo chambers and enclaves of radicalization it creates, how it normalizes niche behaviors through specialized communities - this is the same medium in which you're supposed to push a mass message to groups who are more resistant to mass messaging? ok...
 

Baka's Weird Case

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2015
Messages
16,926
Reputation
8,193
Daps
83,495
Reppin
Goon Squad - Catset
create a bunch of fake accounts pretending to be republican constituents turning on the party.

"i'm a straight white guy and i can honestly say obama did more for me than trump"
"i voted republican all my life. not anymore until they pass a stimulus and start giving white working class voters tangibles!"
 

Baka's Weird Case

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2015
Messages
16,926
Reputation
8,193
Daps
83,495
Reppin
Goon Squad - Catset
you're really being obtuse here :aicmon:

the number of people on twitter in 08 - 6M, 2020 - 330M monthly active users (WW #'s, not just US)
percent of US adults using FB in 08 - 21%, 2019 - 79%

so a once in a lifetime candidate using a nascent SM to engage a much smaller number of people is easily repeatable? the same SM most people bemoan for how toxic it's become, how many echo chambers and enclaves of radicalization it creates, how it normalizes niche behaviors through specialized communities - this is the same medium in which you're supposed to push a mass message to groups who are more resistant to mass messaging? ok...
obamas campaign was successful online in general, not just on social media. in fact i think they called obama the "internet president" and trump the "social media" president. back then you didn't really need a specific social media strategy because social media reflected the internet pretty closely, and the internet was really liberal back then

republicans learned from the obama campaign and just started outsourcing all that shyt to other groups like cambridge analytica.
 
Top