What does "no games" really mean to you?

[The Intergalactic Koala]

I have noticed this trend with the gaming community where folks talking about "where the games at" for every console.

Despite the fact that there's AA releases, indies, and revamped classics to keep the gamers fed.

Now the question is what is the true definition of "no games"

• Something on the level of 2007 with blockbusters out the ass
• A epic new IP that will sell like gangbusters
• GTA6

I just wanna know

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Stan shyt

In realty no matter where you are there’s lots of games to play.

 

[The Intergalactic Koala]

Stan shyt

In realty no matter where you are there’s lots of games to play.

Yeah I'm not understanding the arguments this year alone when we just got a AA game that shytted on a AAA game for 40 bones.

Also a remake of a janky GOATed game and other games.

Hell, we also got a better The Sims at home, while The Sims can't even fix their own home. Make it make sense.

 

[Gizmo_Duck]

For a lot of years xbox literally had no first party games releasing (and didn’t get a lot of 3rd party games) so now the idiots can‘t stop repeating it verbatim

 

[daze23]

you see none of those games you're enjoying 'count', because they're not Console Exclusives™

 

[MeachTheMonster]

you see none of those games you're enjoying 'count', because they're not Console Exclusives™

For a lot of years xbox literally had no first party games releasing (and didn’t get a lot of 3rd party games) so now the idiots can‘t stop repeating it verbatim

 

[OneDeep]

Console Exclusive Games that make you want that system

PlayStation & Nintendo have significantly more games (Series) that are made for those consoles than Xbox has right now

 

[Buckeye Fever]

I've always wondered the same thing.

I see ppl say "no games", but I would go in damn wal mart and see a bunch of games for the console.

They must be talking about exclusives or something

 

[gurf]

In the current landscape it means exclusive/big budget games

 

[The Intergalactic Koala]

I dig it as far as exclusives, but sadly them days are over once crossplay became a thing, and Microsoft decided to be on their Sega 3rd party shyt.

It's like companies including the big three, just trying to make ends meet on all accords, because the days of copping a Super Nintendo just to get a better version of Street fighter are over.

The gamers themselves need to get to grip that the reason why those days existed because of exclusive tech and bells and whistles.

When Sony tried that shyt with the PS3, the average gamer just saw price, while the Devs were spooked about the Cell. The shyt was too advance that the first party had to make people believe that the PS3>>>>360.

Now in this era of Forza being on PS5 and Helldivers being on PC, it's no point.

We all won in the end.

 

[Kingshango]

No games=Not enough console exclusive titles worth dropping x amount of dollars for the console.

 

[Fatboi1]

Ignore the strawman joke posts from the other clowns, they know exactly what was meant when people said "Xbox has no games."
In that context, it had no immediate "games" that were only on Xbox that warranted copping the system day 1 for that game.

They play dumb, they know people are interested in the Switch 2 for what, those exclusive games. Nobody buying a Switch 2 because they only want Street Fighter 6 or Cyberpunk, they want Mario Kart World or Donkey Kong breh. That's like someone saying why you going to get some Jamaican food, they sell fried plantains at trader joes. You know damn well we want the rice and peas, oxtail and all that shyt, the exclusives not no multiplats(cabbage, fried plantains.)


On PS5, games like Astro Bot, Demons Souls, GT7, Spider-Man 2, FFVII Rebirth etc were games that if you wanted to play them, you needed to have a PS5.
On Xbox you can't say the same, 99% of their exclusives are dropping even now on PS5 day one. Like, Gears of fukking War is coming to PS5 this summer, what else is there to argue about?

 

[blackestofpanthers]

Anyone that thinks this gen is great or there’s a plethora of great games to play is in the minority. When people say there aren’t many games, they’re talking about games that can define a generation, stuff you can name off the top of your head, that’s lost now. There used to be much much more than just a handful for an entire generation , now you might get 3 or 4. nikkas naming games 99% of the population has no clue and thinking that makes a difference smh

 

[gurf]

Anyone that thinks this gen is great or there’s a plethora of great games to play is in the minority. When people say there aren’t many games, they’re talking about games that can define a generation, stuff you can name off the top of your head, that’s lost now. There used to be much much more than just a handful for an entire generation , now you might get 3 or 4. nikkas naming games 99% of the population has no clue and thinking that makes a difference smh

Only people that say this are AAA Graphics Only guys.

Not that there is anything wrong with that.

 

[blackestofpanthers]

Only people that say this are AAA Graphics Only guys.

Not that there is anything wrong with that.

Can’t argue with the majority, so make up some false stance
nikkas on here gladly playing remakes and remasters of 360/ps3 era games but talking about its us that think this gen sucks that are concerned about graphics