I don't need the mission statement for auditors.
I understand the PCAOB
But the audit is not for them it's for the client and most the shyt you do for the client doesn't amount to much in the end other than billable hours
I don't see how anyone can be comfortable over an account balance (even cash) without performing the appropriate audit procedures.
People say that journal entry testing is just busy work. World com would have been prevented if someone did journal entry testing.
People say that SOX testing (including walkthroughs) doesn't add value. however, we perform our audits based on the foundation of the audit risk model. We have to be robust in how we support our assessment of control risk. That is the basis for the nature, extent and timing of our testing (at least 50%). After reading some of the workbooks of others, I absolutely understand the critiques coming from the PCOAB.
People in the past had this same attitude-- SOX is boring, SOX doesn't add value, SOX is just a documentation exercise. Plainly, people just don't really understand what they are doing, and they don't seem to get the big picture.
I have never done anything in audit that felt like it was just "busy" work.
That said, I have never worked on a huge team either. Every team I have been on has had a very tight margin and a very apparent and restrictive budget. We had no room to "run-up" billable hours because we wouldn't get paid for it. I am sure partners on huge clients do "run-up" hours.