- Joined
- Feb 28, 2013
- Messages
- 32,437
- Reputation
- -10,667
- Daps
- 22,262
- Reppin
- The Original Rec Room Gang
I'm gonna say Battlefield 4
That singleplayer campaign from a whiles back was
The multiplayer looks nice. I really did enjoy the Beta on xbox even tho that is where my problems/worries begin.
If you haven't noticed, EA and probably most Dev's are skimping on the graphics. BF4 on X360 looked like shyt
Played nice, was mildly fun. But graphically it looked like an alpha build. Hopefully it was, but graphically it was close to horrid
They want you to notice the difference, and this tactic isn't cool, but it is smart. Madden comes to mind, and not skimping has made plenty of gamers vocal. And this is before they even seen the games for themselves.
So gamers being "dumb" forces EA's and other companies hand. Its business, not personal
Now Battlefield BC2 was deemed the shyt by BF heads. Its the reason we are even checking for BF4
Nobody gave a shyt about BF2, and BF3 I personally didn't really like that much. Other Battlefield heads would agree that BF3 was alright but couldn't touch BF:BC2
So those gamers are hoping BF4 can match that game. The question is does it? BF4 is supposed to be more destructable which is what they want. But all I've seen is a big gimmicky buidling falling which is cool, but isn't what BF:BC2 was about. Will those BFBC2 elements be in BF4?
I haven't seen a single BF4 fan go "BFBC2 physics are back
"
IF BF4 ends up being more of the same as BF3? This game is
on arrival but won't be universally agreed on til Titanfall hits 
(imo)
That singleplayer campaign from a whiles back was
The multiplayer looks nice. I really did enjoy the Beta on xbox even tho that is where my problems/worries begin.
If you haven't noticed, EA and probably most Dev's are skimping on the graphics. BF4 on X360 looked like shyt
Played nice, was mildly fun. But graphically it looked like an alpha build. Hopefully it was, but graphically it was close to horrid
They want you to notice the difference, and this tactic isn't cool, but it is smart. Madden comes to mind, and not skimping has made plenty of gamers vocal. And this is before they even seen the games for themselves.
So gamers being "dumb" forces EA's and other companies hand. Its business, not personal
Now Battlefield BC2 was deemed the shyt by BF heads. Its the reason we are even checking for BF4
Nobody gave a shyt about BF2, and BF3 I personally didn't really like that much. Other Battlefield heads would agree that BF3 was alright but couldn't touch BF:BC2
So those gamers are hoping BF4 can match that game. The question is does it? BF4 is supposed to be more destructable which is what they want. But all I've seen is a big gimmicky buidling falling which is cool, but isn't what BF:BC2 was about. Will those BFBC2 elements be in BF4?
I haven't seen a single BF4 fan go "BFBC2 physics are back
"IF BF4 ends up being more of the same as BF3? This game is
on arrival but won't be universally agreed on til Titanfall hits (imo)