King
The black man is always targeted.
They only shyt on unions because CAC corporatists shoved it down their throat.
What John Deere Employees Got From Going On Strike
- Thread starter Prince.Skeletor
- Start date
You anti-union because your local had some shytty members?
Scustin Bieburr
Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
It's not a coincidence that America was more secure and prosperous when union membership was higher
and a lot of people who are leaving their jobs are switching to union jobs.
and a lot of people who are leaving their jobs are switching to union jobs.
At CAT, they stay walkin workers out on 10 day suspensions
They got a lot of supplemental workers out there. Mostly forklift drivers. They are probably the easiest to replace. I'm a machinist, and a lot of those brehs miss work like it aint shyt because they know it is a little tougher to replace them. I dont fukk around though. I got zero call-ins since i been there lol
Silver Surfer
Veteran
Pay them brehs
Dont be surprised when they move to fully automated factories or damn near fully automated
Rembrandt
the artist
Same shyt they been doing anyways, even in places that actively discourage unions?
I’m as pro Union as they come, I’m in a union job right now just not teamster.
was just sharing my past experiences about the disadvantages of a Union workforce
This isn’t UPS or amazon moving boxes of cookware and toiletries. We talking machinist, industrial electricians, pipe fitters etc. Not everything can be automated.
Poverty is manufactured in the US. If Bezo paid all of his employees 6 fig, he would still be a billionaire. He elects to not pay everyone.
Secure Da Bag
Veteran
That's correlation not causation. I'm not saying unions didn't do the work. But they were a piece of the puzzle and not the majority of it.
America was more secure and prosperous because the "shareholder trumps all" mindset hadn't set in yet and the rest of the world were still recovering from WW2.
Secure Da Bag
Veteran
Bezos being a billionaire has to do with how much money people are putting into Amazon stocks, not how much revenue or profit Amazon makes.
Now if there's evidence that he's putting 50% of Amazon's profits into stock buyback, then I stand corrected.
He could certainly pay his employees more. The most generous, inflationed, minimum wage numbers is $26/hr. Amazon could certainly pay that and most likely still not take a major hit on profit.
But those are two different arguments.
Contract negotiations are about to start at my job. One of the long time workers here just said dont expect to get what John Deere got