what's going on here? : UAE and Kemit strikes on Libya stir US fears of an arab free-for-all

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,436
Daps
26,227
The U.S. was reportedly caught off guard last week by a mysterious set of airstrikes in Libya, which senior White House officials told The New York Times were carried out by the United Arab Emirates with support from Egypt. The report, denied by both countries, has sparked concerns that transnational military action without Washington’s endorsement by two of the region’s U.S.-armed powers portends a new era of free-for-all military intervention in the Middle East amid waning U.S. influence.

Since providing limited support to the air campaign that helped topple ex-dictator Muammar Gaddafi in 2011, Barack Obama’s administration has been reluctant to do its allies’ bidding in Libya — a messy conflict whose outcome is seen in Washington as of limited consequence for U.S. interests. But some U.S. allies are more deeply invested, seeing the power struggle among Libya’s rival militias as an extension of their regional effort to exterminate the Muslim Brotherhood and its backers.

http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/8/28/libya-air-strikeconcern.html

U.S., analysts caution that even if the strikes were carried out by the UAE, for now they appear to be an isolated event rather than part of a coherent campaign with a clearly defined goal. The very fact that nobody has claimed responsibility for the F-16 air raids underscores the trepidation of their authors about assuming a more assertive military stance in the region.
 

NZA

LOL
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
23,100
Reputation
4,753
Daps
59,315
Reppin
Gang violence...
this is more in line with obama's war strategy. let them actually do the heavy lifting in their own backyard. if they wont do it, then it just wont get done under obama, i prefer it that way. this is really the only good way to fight a group like ISIS without inadvertently creating a new one.
 

2Quik4UHoes

Why you had to go?
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
64,231
Reputation
19,242
Daps
240,736
Reppin
Norfeast groovin…

Ethiopia/Egypt rivalry over the Nile goes back to the Pharaohs. Nowadays they like to act as if the Brits favorably ruling over the Nile during the colonial era still applies. Egypt contributes roughly 10% of the Nile's water while Ethiopia provides 86% and has tremendous potential for hydroelectric power and scientists have already proven that it wouldn't affect Egypt's Nile water count.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
92,350
Reputation
3,851
Daps
164,829
Reppin
Brooklyn
Ethiopia/Egypt rivalry over the Nile goes back to the Pharaohs. Nowadays they like to act as if the Brits favorably ruling over the Nile during the colonial era still applies. Egypt contributes roughly 10% of the Nile's water while Ethiopia provides 86% and has tremendous potential for hydroelectric power and scientists have already proven that it wouldn't affect Egypt's Nile water count.

America is moving away from Hydro according to a report I heard last night, granted we're a single country.
 
Top