What’s really pushing politics to the right? Immigration.

[theworldismine13]

What’s really pushing politics to the right? Immigration.
What’s really pushing politics to the right? Immigration.

A joke among journalists is that we are taught to count: “one, two, trend.” But at this point, I think it’s fair to say that we are witnessing a populist trend around the world. The real question is, what is fueling its extraordinary rise?

Almost a month after Donald Trump’s election, Europeans went to the polls, with mixed results. Italians voted against everything — the establishment, the European Union and, by extension, their centrist, reform-minded prime minister, Matteo Renzi. Austrian voters, by contrast, rejected far-right candidate Norbert Hofer. But it was still startling that his Freedom Party — whose first leader was a former Nazi minister and SS member — received 46 percent of the national vote. Over the past few years, almost everywhere in Europe — including France, the Netherlands and Germany — right-wing populist parties have gained ground.

In most of the continent, populists still seem unlikely to take power because they cannot replicate Trump’s success in getting control of a mainstream political party. European parties are internally strong and have mechanisms to block such a hostile takeover. U.S. political parties, on the other hand, since the advent of primaries, have become nothing more than vessels for popular politicians. Once it was clear that Trump would win the Republican nomination, the party structure folded and became his executive arm.

Supporters of Trump and other populist movements often point to economics as the key to their success — the slow recovery, wage stagnation, the erosion of manufacturing jobs, rising inequality. These are clearly powerful contributing factors. But it is striking that we see right-wing populism in Sweden, which is doing well economically; in Germany, where manufacturing remains robust; and in France, where workers have many protections. Here in the United States, exit polls showed that the majority of voters who were most concerned about the economy cast their ballots for Hillary Clinton.

The one common factor present everywhere, however, is immigration. In fact, one statistical analysis of European Union countries found that more immigrants invariably means more populists. According to the study, if you extrapolate from current trends, “as the percentage of immigrants approaches approximately 22 percent, the percentage of right-wing populist voters exceeds 50 percent.” Hostility to immigration has been a core theme of every one of these populist parties.

Donald Trump is now at the forefront of a global, far-right movement
Play Video1:40
Many far-right parties in Europe are celebrating the presidential victory of Donald J. Trump. (Jason Aldag, Ishaan Tharoor/The Washington Post)
One way to test this theory is to note that countries without large-scale immigration, such as Japan, have not seen the same rise of right-wing populism. Another interesting case is Spain, a country that has taken in many immigrants, but mostly Spanish-speaking Latinos, who are easier to assimilate. While you see traditional left-wing economic populism in Spain, you do not see right-wing nationalist movements.

Opinions newsletter

Thought-provoking opinions and commentary, in your inbox daily.



The backlash against immigration is rooted in fact. As I pointed out in a Foreign Affairs essay (written in September, before Trump’s victory), we are living in an age of mass migration. In the past three or four decades, Western societies have seen large influxes of people from different lands and cultures. In 1970, foreign-born people made up less than 5 percent of the U.S. population; today they are about 14 percent. The rise is even sharper in most European countries, home to 76 million international migrants, recently coming mostly from Africa and the Middle East. Austria, for example, took in almost 100,000 immigrants last year — adding 1 percent to its population in 2015 alone.

This much change can be unsettling. For most of human history, people have lived, worked and died within a few miles of the place they were born. But in recent decades, hundreds of millions of people from poorer countries have moved to wealthier ones. This reflects an economic reality. Rich countries have declining birthrates and need labor; poor countries have millions who seek better lives. But this produces anxiety, unease and a cultural backlash that we are witnessing across the Western world.

What does this mean for the future? Western societies will have to better manage immigration. They should also place much greater emphasis on assimilation. Canada should be a role model. It has devised smart policies on both fronts, with high levels of (skilled) immigration, strong assimilation and no major recoil.

Eventually, Western societies will be able to adjust to this new feature of globalization. Look at young people in Europe and the United States, most of whom deeply value the benefits of diversity and seek to live in an open and connected world. That’s the future. We just have to ensure that we don’t wreck the world before we get there.

 

[YvrzTrvly]

Long live multiculturalism, multiculturalism never lived in the first place

 

[theworldismine13]

This article is on point, All the white working class stuff is BS, if democrats didn't have an extremist position on immigration Hillary would have won

A little immigration is good, a lot of immigration is bad, democrats refuse to understand this

 

[Scoop]

Tough to get blacks to turn out when the Dem's policies dilute blacks' share of the economy and voting pool.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

All it took was Obama being black.

 

[theworldismine13]

Tough to get blacks to turn out when the Dem's policies dilute blacks' share of the economy and voting pool.

Democrats are falling over themselves to declare cities sanctuary cities and giving money for illegal immigrants, while ignoring the poor black people in those same cities, Obama had to fall back because of an illegal executive order, he wants more Syrian refugees.....who are they doing this for?

Whites don't care, blacks don't care and a huge portion of hispanics don't care

This is typical

 

[Scoop]

ADevilYouKhow negged you for your post in the thread What’s really pushing politics to the right? Immigration.. With the following comment: Bigot

truth hurts

 

[southpawstyle]

All it took was Obama being black.

It's because the promises and potential of a global economy took a backseat to capitalist labor and land exploitation. Lol at European countries and America acting like they're the ones being fukked over when they created this system.

 

[Scoop]

VegasCAC negged you for your post in the thread What’s really pushing politics to the right? Immigration.. With the following comment: Hold another

Big man for hitting me with your internet points for telling the truth

 

[Red Shield]

It's because the promises and potential of a global economy took a backseat to capitalist labor and land exploitation. Lol at European countries and America acting like they're the ones being fukked over when they created this system.

tell me about it

 

[DonFrancisco]

Building a wall is meant to keep ideas and culture out as well as actual people. Also multiculturalism isn't a choice, it is an effect due to our world being so connected. Immigrants in the past were forced to adopt customs because they didn't have a choice. With the internet and the ease & volume of travel, immigrants are more incline to retain their native culture.

As a Latino it personally hurts to know people really don't want me here. At the same time there is nothing anyone can do about it now

 

[Trece]

This article is on point, All the white working class stuff is BS, if democrats didn't have an extremist position on immigration Hillary would have won

A little immigration is good, a lot of immigration is bad, democrats refuse to understand this

Controlled immigration is always good.. unrestricted immigration isnt good..

 

[theworldismine13]

Building a wall is meant to keep ideas and culture out as well as actual people. Also multiculturalism isn't a choice, it is an effect due to our world being so connected. Immigrants in the past were forced to adopt customs because they didn't have a choice. With the internet and the ease & volume of travel, immigrants are more incline to retain their native culture.

As a Latino it personally hurts to know people really don't want me here. At the same time there is nothing anyone can do about it now

The problem is that you continue this extremist and absurd notion that there is no difference between legal and illegal immigration and try to turn immigration into a social justice issue

If people personally choose to retain their culture in the privacy of their home that's fine, that is a right, I actually think you are wrong and the notion of keeping a native culture is silly and will ultimately fail over the long term because of the internet, and
Free markets will ultimately cause people to assimilate

multiculturalism in the negative sense is when government starts making laws and regulations to make sure that people keep their native culture or language or this notion that people have a right to their culture

So multiculturalism, in the sense that I'm using is definitely a choice and it's something the population can decide on, multiculturalism is a wasteful government effort to stop the forces of the free market and the forces of assimilation

Only native Americans and African Americans have a right to their culture, immigrants don't

 

[¯\_(ツ)_/¯]

This article is on point, All the white working class stuff is BS, if democrats didn't have an extremist position on immigration Hillary would have won

A little immigration is good, a lot of immigration is bad, democrats refuse to understand this

Sooooo explain these numbers to me:

In U.S., 65% Favor Path to Citizenship for Illegal Immigrants
More Republicans Favor Path to Citizenship Than Wall

Stay or deport? In a Pew Research Center survey conducted in May, a solid majority (72%) of Americans – including 80% of Democrats, 76% of independents and 56% of Republicans – say undocumented immigrants currently living in the U.S. should be allowed to stay in this country legally if they meet certain requirements. Last year, we asked a follow-up question of those who opposed granting legal status to undocumented immigrants: Should there be a “national law enforcement effort to deport” all immigrants here illegally? Just 17% of the public overall favored such an effort, including about a quarter (27%) of Republicans.

What Americans want to do about illegal immigration

These stats and details are in line with the Democratic platform on immigration.....

 

[#StarkSet]

Sooooo explain these numbers to me:

In U.S., 65% Favor Path to Citizenship for Illegal Immigrants
More Republicans Favor Path to Citizenship Than Wall




These stats and details are in line with the Democratic platform on immigration.....

I think we saw how useful polls were this election