What’s the Point of a Professor?

Street Knowledge

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
27,799
Reputation
2,728
Daps
67,126
Reppin
NYC
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/05/10/opinion/sunday/whats-the-point-of-a-professor.html?referrer=

ATLANTA — IN the coming weeks, two million Americans will earn a bachelor’s degree and either join the work force or head to graduate school. They will be joyous that day, and they will remember fondly the schools they attended. But as this unique chapter of life closes and they reflect on campus events, one primary part of higher education will fall low on the ladder of meaningful contacts: the professors.

That’s what students say. Oh, they’re quite content with their teachers; after all, most students receive sure approval. In 1960, only 15 percent of grades were in the “A” range, but now the rate is 43 percent, making “A” the most common grade by far.

Faculty members’ attitudes are kindly, too. In one national survey, 61 percent of students said that professors frequently treated them “like a colleague/peer,” while only 8 percent heard frequent “negative feedback about their academic work.” More than half leave the graduation ceremony believing that they are “well prepared” in speaking, writing, critical thinking and decision-making.

But while they’re content with teachers, students aren’t much interested in them as thinkers and mentors. They enroll in courses and complete assignments, but further engagement is minimal.

One measure of interest in what professors believe, what wisdom they possess apart from the content of the course, is interaction outside of class. It’s often during incidental conversations held after the bell rings and away from the demands of the syllabus that the transfer of insight begins and a student’s emulation grows. Students email teachers all the time — why walk across campus when you can fire a note from your room? — but those queries are too curt for genuine mentoring. We need face time.

Here, though, are the meager numbers. For a majority of undergraduates, beyond the two and a half hours per week in class, contact ranges from negligible to nonexistent. In their first year, 33 percent of students report that they never talk with professors outside of class, while 42 percent do so only sometimes. Seniors lower that disengagement rate only a bit, with 25 percent never talking to professors, and 40 percent sometimes.
 

Street Knowledge

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
27,799
Reputation
2,728
Daps
67,126
Reppin
NYC
It hasn’t always been this way. “I revered many of my teachers,” Todd Gitlin said when we met at the New York Public Library last month. He’s a respected professor of journalism and sociology at Columbia, but in the 1960s he was a fiery working-class kid at Harvard before becoming president of Students for a Democratic Society.

I asked if student unrest back then included disregard of the faculty. Not at all, he said. Nobody targeted professors. Militants attacked the administration for betraying what the best professors embodied, the free inquisitive space of the Ivory Tower.

I saw the same thing in my time at the University of California, Los Angeles, in the early 1980s, when you couldn’t walk down the row of faculty offices without stepping over the outstretched legs of English majors lining up for consultations. First-year classes could be as large as 400, but by junior year you settled into a field and got to know a few professors well enough to chat with them regularly, and at length. We knew, and they knew, that these moments were the heart of liberal education.

In our hunger for guidance, we were ordinary. The American Freshman Survey, which has followed students since 1966, proves the point. One prompt in the questionnaire asks entering freshmen about “objectives considered to be essential or very important.” In 1967, 86 percent of respondents checked “developing a meaningful philosophy of life,” more than double the number who said “being very well off financially.”

Naturally, students looked to professors for moral and worldly understanding. Since then, though, finding meaning and making money have traded places. The first has plummeted to 45 percent; the second has soared to 82 percent.
 

OfTheCross

Veteran
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
43,573
Reputation
5,084
Daps
99,080
Reppin
Keeping my overhead low, and my understand high
You get that connection at smaller schools typically.

But professors these days will work for UM, Miami-Dade, and FIU at the same damn time.

So someone going to the community college pretty much has the same faculty as someone paying for UM

But since they've got so much workload, those office hours are super scarce
 

TTT

All Star
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
2,249
Reputation
460
Daps
5,557
Reppin
NULL
It depends on the type of university. Research universities do not pay professors to be good teachers but to be excellent researchers. As long as they bring in grants from NIH,NSF and whatever other organizations they are fine. The most talented ones at some colleges even get to trade classes for each grant or paper they work on. Research productivity is what they look for and if the schools are like UCLA or Columbia as mentioned they are even under more pressure to do research. The extent may differ according to discipline but for most schools today the teaching load is to be carried by adjuncts , non tenure track lecturers and teaching assistants.
 

tmonster

Superstar
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
17,900
Reputation
3,205
Daps
31,793
what good is an educated person being made available to someone seeking to be educated?:dahell: role model?:lupe:
 
Top