This may be a dumb question but what is the point of inflation if everything else like pay and wages go up as well?

Can you explain how the cost of goods going up is a good thing when wages haven’t risen to meet those costs?Inflation, at least with regards to the U.S. economy, is a buzzword thrown about by fear mongering free market capitalists who like to feign disgust at running deficits whenever the money is allocated for purposes beyond enriching wealthy white people. Whenever you hear someone decrying the onset of inflation,![]()
Can you explain how the cost of goods going up is a good thing when wages haven’t risen to meet those costs?
If inflation increases and your wage hasn’t, that means your standard of living has dropped.

Inflation benefits the rich because they own high value assets so I don’t quite understand the point you’re making. When inflation rises so does the price of their properties, stocks etc. Far more so than the hit they take paying for things so it’s in their interest for inflation to go up.Who makes the decisions about whose wages increases and whose doesn't? Executives aren't seeing their wages plateau. And the "cost of goods" is another arbitrary metric that is subject to the whims of those with money. Most goods that are sold in this country cost pennies on the dollar to make, manufactured by peasants in third world countries before being shipped to markets around the globe to be sold at astronomical markups. Again, "inflation" is an imaginary tactic employed by the elites to buttress their wealth from the prying hands of the lowly riffraff in the streets.![]()
Inflation affects middle and poor people because it's basically a transfer of wealth to the rich. Most people have fixed and inflexible incomes so when inflation happens, salaries do not go up the same rate as goods and services. Those that provide the goods and services are usually those with flexible and higher incomes.

San Francisco is a perfect example of this.This is patently false. History shows, during times of inflation, that corporate profits increase right along with executive salaries. And this isn't because of inflation; rather, it's because profits are still being raked in. The only class of people who don't benefit during inflation are the middle class and working poor, whose wages stagnate while the price of goods rises. If there were caps of executive salaries during "inflationary" periods, including a freeze on stock purchases and bonuses, wages of workers could rise and an equilibrium between that and cost of living would be met.![]()
That would devalue a carrot if the price stayed the same. The price of it has to correspond with people’s spending/wages.
That comes into it too. The more money/disposable income people have, the more likely they are to spend. So if the costs of products don’t go up with wages, then naturally there would be more demand than supply... but as we know, there are other external factors that can affect supply/demand:Sorry, I didn't pay attention in economics class....I thought the price of a product corresponds with supply and demand?
